What is
the Simple Answer to the
Stem Cell Research Dilemma?
by Camille De Blasi
Director, Center for Life
Principles
Stem cells are undifferentiated master cells
(cells that don't have an assigned job, yet). They
will specialize into certain cell types when
directed to do so by the body. For example, in the
human embryo, some stem cells will be directed to
transform into brain cells, others into bones,
muscles, and organs. Scientists are eager to
research on stem cells because they believe it may
be possible to force stem cells into becoming
whatever we want them to become, in order to cure
illnesses and diseases. For example, scientists
hope that they might be able to repair a damaged
heart by injecting stem cells into it. They are
researching how we can manipulate the cells to
transform themselves into healthy heart cells and
rebuild the damaged heart.
Stem cells can be safely obtained from umbilical
cords and placentas left over after birth, and from
adult sources like bone marrow and fat tissue,
without jeopardizing human life. However, some
scientists prefer to use stem cells from the human
embryo because they believe those cells are more
"pliable," or more easily prodded into becoming
what we want them to become.
Since the only way to procure embryonic stem
cells is to cause the death of the unborn child
from which you are extracting them, such procedures
are objectively wrong. Even in a state of cellular
undifferentiation, the embryonic human being
already contains the guiding force that will direct
his cells into human orientation and growth. It is
the same guiding force that continues to direct our
growth and development throughout adulthood. As
Patrick Lee and Robert George recently noted in
Reason, Science, and Stem Cells: Why killing
embryonic human beings is wrong, "[the
human embryo] already has the potential to
actively develop himself or herself to the further
stages of maturity of the same kind of organism he
or she already is."
Although President Bush's decision not to
provide government funding for the destruction of
human beings for this kind of experimentation was
very good, it was unfortunate that he compromised
this position. He allowed funds to do research on
the stem cell lines that have already been taken
from babies who have already been killed. Respect
for human dignity would dictate that we lack proper
informed consent to perform research and
experimentation on people we have deliberately and
unjustly killed. It is like gold-digging through
the teeth of concentration camp victims, and
justifying it by saying, "They have died anyway.
And now some good can come from it."
This essay is courtesy of the Center for Life
Principles, 2601 - 151st Place NE, Redmond, WA
98052. Telephone 1-877-345-LIFE. E-Mail: mail@lifeprinciples.net.
Find them on the web at www.lifeprinciples.net.
You may respond to this brief in The
Radical Academy Forum
|