|
September 13, 2006
The
Creed of Greed
Materialism
on the Edge of Extinction
A
Big Picture Overview and Critique of a World
Attempting to Shoot Itself in the
Heart
by Donald Croft Brickner
Let's just get down to it:
There is only one way to throttle human
aggression, which has zero interest in reasonable
debate: by delivering a figurative bloodied nose to
its practitioners.
While that sounds like a declaration of
counter-aggression, it's not intended to be.
America's presence in Iraq proves that out bullying
the bully is a tactic that's long-since seen it's
day. "Shock and awe" doesn't work, because now so
many of America's enemies don't care if they
survive or not, even under an umbrella of deadly
bombs, fireworks, human gore, and thundering,
screaming sound effects.
Dirty Harry's day is over, and it's now time to
face that. So are his scripted punch lines, which
were always blindly self-righteous and delusional.
In any case, about the only way for aggressives to
have their noses bloodied now is by their own
hands, it seems clear.
That day, I believe, may be just around the
corner. The meek are conceivably on the threshold
of inheriting this beat-up Earth from their
emotionally ill aggressive counterparts, who
not-so-surprisingly claim no particular
nationality.
Aggression is now a global psychological
illness.
* * * * *
It must first be determined that greed and
materialism (and their fleet-afoot chariot, human
aggression) are unattractive contributors to a
world spiraling into apparent collapse
across-the-boards -- at least from an
incontrovertible human rights, safety and survival
standpoint. That shouldn't be difficult to
verify.
Unattractive means such behaviors are just that:
these are ugly political and big business character
defects, with what's now only a negligible positive
application. Greed and materialism (a positivistic
stranglehold on the material world as a be-all and
end-all of existence) are undeniably on shaky
big-picture footing philosophically, unless you
argue for a strictly random, pointless physical
universe -- which is a lot harder to defend than
one might imagine. Discoveries in quantum physics
alone have dispelled such a notion as outdated.
As for aggression -- if you've been on the
receiving end of it (and who hasn't?), you don't
like it, no matter how it manifests. Conceptually,
as well, because of its self-destructive nature
(it's "I'm not okay, you're not okay," in
transactional analysis terms), it is untenable in a
caring world
and let's be clear about this:
almost all of us care -- even the cynics and
murderers among us. Those few who don't are
sociopaths, and the majority of those individuals
are just characters in our movies.
Yes, yes. There have been remarkable advances in
the arena of material goods and services over the
last century, even if some of those advances have
proven ill-considered, like pillaging Earth's
limits in fossil fuels.
But does the life, liberty and happiness of
people matter anymore? As a package it doesn't
appear to. In the new Creed of Greed established by
global economic practitioners today (including
their enabling governments), people are just plain
expendable in favor of what's become an almost
mindless materialistic and relentless pursuit to
"obtain" -- while what is obtained doesn't even
seem to much matter any longer. Psychologically,
thus, such pursuit has arguably devolved into
addiction.
That old saw about He Who Has All the Toys Wins
has become a single-minded blind obsession. Too
much secular life now is about winners and losers.
Both inside and outside houses of religion, the
global economic game plan regularly slithers into
little more than a rendition of a Parker Brothers'
game of Monopoly, motivationally -- not an
enormously mature turn of events since, say, the
1970s.
It doesn't matter (yet) that there are so many
well-meaning and capable people in world
governments at this point. Too many political
leaders are now often little more than naughty,
self-serving adult children practicing sociological
delusions and ugly one-note determinations to end
up the winner of this Monopoly game.
Such aspirants face this: how does the last
political (or corporate) winner "collect rent," so
to speak, once everyone else has been removed from
the (figurative) playing board? Answer: they can't.
The "game" ends in a dead-end stalemate.
* * * * *
Such undeclared, materialistic beliefs seem to
have become a widely embraced (if unspoken and
uniformly unexamined) philosophy of sorts, too. And
if they're the real enemy -- aberrant
beliefs in play, as opposed to alternative
cultures -- we simply have no other alternative but
to examine them.
Broad strokes will do for now.
First, let's dispense with manipulative
capitalism vs. manipulative socialism as an issue,
because neither is at play here, and they're
unlikely to factor into a future solution. Neither
political philosophy understands the nature of the
world we now live in which, once again, is neither
random (completely) nor pointless -- perhaps the
chief argument to be formulated here, which at its
core clarifies our entire global structure along
with the probable purposes of physical existence.
Earth's inhabitants no longer appear to be in any
mood, it should appear obvious, to be pushed around
any longer by those who have now become, however
blindly (on both the political and corporate
levels), mere crass, garden-variety
manipulators.
Only denial blinds one to such a clear-cut
deduction -- although there's plenty of that still
going around.
* * * * *
What will be proposed next will be theory, but
it will be tenable theory -- and that's a notion
whose day has hopefully arrived.
Why do masses of people murder other masses of
people these days? Are we as blind, ignorant and
stupid as our predecessors in history -- or are we
simply angry and frightened robots whose behaviors
are the result of genetics? One thinks not, on both
counts. Something else is going on here. And that
something else is both psychological/emotional, and
silently philosophical, in nature.
Studying the world's political issues can all be
clarified by digging ever deeper, deeper, and
deeper again (as may any symptomatic behaviors), to
arrive at a far-closer-to-the-truth reason for why
our physical world has become an increasingly
unhappy and violent place. There are no known think
tanks that look at the planet and its inhabitants'
ills in quite this fashion, either, one should
note.
* * * * *
How deep must we dig, in order to get a true
sense of the primary issues at play?
Very, very deep -- beneath the layers of
physical reality that have blinded us as a
species.
* * * * *
Our chief determination goes like this: at the
subatomic level (or faster than the speed of
light), the rules of physics, well, shift -- not
change, really, because that would make the
subatomic and physical worlds separate and
unrelated, which simply can't be true. Subatomic
matter forms the building blocks for the
physical.
In any event, the statistical analyses in each
realm, let's call them, are consistent, but
different. Why that's so hasn't yet been made clear
to scientists. Regardless, these seemingly
disparate circumstances and rules suggest --
strongly suggest -- that the subatomic and physical
realms are, in fact, different realities,
intimately related though they may be.
* * * * *
Consequently: If there are (at the very, very
least) two related realities that are to all
appearances different -- which rules, of which
reality, best reflect the nature of our greater
reality in general?
Which reality is most "real," in other
words?
It logically must be the subatomic realm, for it
is that which undeniably provides the foundation
for our physical universe.
Given that, then: our physical world must
be a construct of the subatomic realm.
* * * * *
As a construct, then, too, it's not a primary
reality (think about it) -- but rather, again at
best, a secondary one. The subatomic reality,
therefore, necessarily reflects the nature of how
things really "work," only we can't readily see it,
touch it, smell it or what-have-you while living in
this illusory physical universe.
Illusory physical universe -- as in an illusion.
Our physical universe, therefore, is a phantom.
It's there, only it doesn't really "look" the way
we think it does.
Is that an apple you're eating? Yes, in the
physical realm. But neither your mouth nor the
apple are anything more than constructs of
subatomic bits of this and that -- in a reality
which is more reflective of the subatomic
nature of mouths and apples, where neither look
like anything the least bit distinguishable to us
here in the physical world. Mouths and apples are
really sub-microscopic multistructures that bounce
around inside what appears to be mostly empty
space.
There's just no getting around that, according
to repeatable studies in physics.
So what's that got to do with our global
politics, and the Creed of Greed? Plenty.
* * * * *
As physical "people," we're as illusory as our
physical universe -- only not one substantial
culture here on Earth acknowledges that yet.
But once we do absorb that, and let it sink in
-- if we do -- our behaviors will change.
How could they not?
Our personalities at our deaths do not wisp away
with the illusory "dust" of our illusory
empty-shell bodies. Why? Because we're not
biological robots. Positivist science insists that
we are, but that's a bias, it makes no sense -- and
there's plenty of anecdotal evidence and even some
empirical evidence (The Afterlife
Experiments, Gary E.R. Schwartz, the University
of Arizona) to support life after death.
The idea that we're randomly-conceived robots
makes little sense because all indications insist
that we are not only consciousnesses, but
constructs of some intelligent design -- just like
our illusory, if outrageously grand, universe.
* * * * *
Returning to our physical world, here is just a
handful of what all of that implies:
- Skin color is irrelevant. Regardless of
pigments (themselves an illusion), our bodies
are illusory.
- In a random, meaningless universe, naked
greed and aggression, though still untenable
philosophically, might still make a smattering
of sense to the severely unhappy (read that,
emotionally ill), who are outraged about life's
meaninglessness and so "not okay" about it. But
in a nonrandom, illusory universe, as promoted
here, such misery and outrage could far more
easily be dispelled -- because the Earth and
universe would prove not to be meaningless,
after all.
- A physical life built around greed and, in
particular, materialism -- even going so far as
to structure a philosophy around either or both
of them -- could be dismissed far more easily in
a caring universe, as materialism would make no
sense, given its lack of purposeful intention,
much less a lack of foundation in empirical
research. One may believe what one will, but
folks need to be on their toes if they're to
buck scientific discovery. Otherwise, delusion
and unfounded bias are in all-too-prominent
play.
- We would likely strive to be far more in
touch with our emotional natures (or, at the
very least, less out of touch with them),
because our robot-like brains, with all of their
(construct) synapses, would be determined to be
illusions.
- Once we come to realize death is nothing to
be afraid of, we'll all relax a lot more -- and
death and violence will resultantly prove to be
less sexy.
* * * * *
Point of order: by labeling the physical world
and its people as illusions is not to make light of
either, or to marginalize our meanings in
experiencing physical life. We can go on and on
with this -- but if the universe is purposeful, we
would better spend our time trying to identify that
purpose, ever keeping it in line with our latest
scientific discoveries and substantial anecdotal
evidences -- which almost no one in even this
contemporary world's (far-too-inflexible) religions
tend to do.
You can't have your reality both ways: religious
tenets, in conflict with science's. And the nature
of our world, and our purpose (or lack of it) in
"living" here won't ever be settled by popular
vote.
Anger won't just up and go away, we should add,
because in this physical world, our emotions are
arguably far more reflective of our conscious and
unconscious natures (which survive physical death),
and so anger will likely remain active for some
as-yet undetermined purpose -- with us left with
how best to acknowledge and deal with what's always
been a very awkward and disruptive emotion.
We might even fight wars. It would be stupid,
under the circumstances -- i.e., we not only all
survive death, but the grounds, atmospheres and
waters of every global nation aren't really what
they appear to be, after all. Yes, it's all
illusion -- but a meaningful one, which is another
topic for discussion further down the road.
There's very good reason why murdering others
(or even committing suicide) in this construct
reality is all "wrong." To date, our emotions
understand that better than our egocentric
intellects, unfortunately -- while too many of our
philosophies unduly have planted our intellects on
pedestals.
Aggressive behavior, by the way, is not as
"strong" as its proponents currently believe.
Aggression is a sure symptom of emotional problems,
left unaddressed. There are few addicts in any
serious 12-stop programs who don't understand that
-- as at least half of them "bottomed out," all on
their own, due to no longer finding themselves able
to continue to act out their aggressions.
Left unchecked, our aggressive natures either
always run out of gas or transform. History is
riddled with examples of that -- which in another
orientation would be correctly labeled a spiritual
awakening -- which is what the inhabitants of
planet Earth appear to desperately need at this
stage of their development.
* * * * *
Returning to the present, and the "real
world:"
While all of what has been stated here surely
has tenable merit, history has shown that change --
real change -- comes pretty slowly.
So what might the near future hold for us?
Global warming events, and all of the nature
issues related to them, seem likely. (A suspicion
here is that our planet is far more capable of
healing itself than we are apt to give it credit
for, however, once we stop beating it up -- a
notion that finally appears to be catching on.)
Prejudice appears to be a certainty, too, with
its wars, along with all of its ever-increasing
fears and rages -- all of which are tied to
prejudice's apron strings. There is no prominent
religious or philosophical practice on Earth that
appears up to the task of heading ongoing
prejudicial events off at the pass. That must
change, along with the limited (and limiting) world
views behind them.
As to the topic of global economics, more and
more people will become homeless or starve, while
the rich will get richer -- at least until our faux
"healthy economies" collapse, highlighted by the
probable bankruptcy of the United States federal
government -- an event that's sure to only become
obvious in retrospect.
* * * * *
Once these threatening events finally become
observable on a global consensus level, however (if
they do), no one will be left to continue to
pretend that their set beliefs were correct. Denial
will fall away, and humility will finally work its
way in.
Figuratively speaking, noses that needed to be
bloodied, will have been -- and it will happen the
very moment the bubbles of denial begin to pop.
Ultimately, greed and materialism, too, will
likely mostly die off -- maybe not for the reasons
stated above alone, but because they, too, result
from aberrant emotions whose immediate foundation
is insecurity. Behind that foundation lies only
fear. The philosophical roots behind greed and
materialism will one day prove to be as illusory as
our reality.
Emotionally, it might even be said, our greatest
single deterrent to the pursuit of life, liberty
and happiness is fear. Are the inhabitants of Earth
courageous? Yes, but only a minor fraction of us,
and for only a minor fraction of the time.
We're not nearly as tough, bulletproof or aloof
as our figurative, bravado-laden press releases to
one another -- particularly as voiced via our
global governments -- would lead us to believe.
Mostly, our entire planet's inhabitants -- the lot
of us -- tend to be scared-to-death behind our
poker face masks and/or our severely entrenched
denials and prejudices.
A good cry would do us all good, probably, one
suspects, to help wash those deeply-buried fears
away.
And, honestly -- that release will probably be
our first real cause for genuine hope for our
collective material future: in this camouflaged,
though highly purposeful, illusion.
That is, of course, if the global consensus is
determined to even have a future.
Destroy our planet, and it's still gone --
illusion or no illusion.
That we'll all survive our collective physical
deaths then will matter not one whit.
Brickner
Archive
Donald
Croft Brickner has lived in roughly half of the
states in America, working countless jobs in a
variety of occupations. Prior to serving as an
enlisted journalist in the U.S. Navy during the
Vietnam era, he majored in music theory in college
and later received an associate's degree in music
education.
After
his military tour, for which he received an
honorable discharge, he pursued his lifelong
interest in the study of metaphysics/ontology, and
finally received his bachelor's degree in
philosophy from the University of Maine-Orono in
1992.
He
later attended graduate studies at the Earlham
School of Religion in Richmond, Indiana and in the
M.F.A. creative writing program at Chapman
University in Orange, California. He has written an
unproduced 3-act play, "Revelations at Mount
Rushmore," which remains on file at the Laguna
Playhouse in Laguna Beach, California. He is also
more than halfway through completing his first
novel.
Visit
his MySpace page at http://www.myspace.com/donaldcroftbrickner
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
|