|
December 16, 2008
Television
is an Hallucination
by Frank Martin DiMeglio
Television is only possible because this
disintegration, reconfiguration, contraction (i.e.,
compression), and extension of visual sensory
experience occurs during dreams. Accordingly, both
television viewing and dreams may be said to
include (or involve) reduced ability to think,
anxiety, and increased distractibility. Television
thus compels attention, as it is compelled in the
dream; but it is an unnatural and hallucinatory
experience. Hence, television is addictive. Similar
to the visual experience while dreaming, television
compels attention to the relative exclusion of
other experience. Television reduces consciousness
and results in a flattening of the visual
experience as a result of combining waking visual
experience with relatively unconscious visual
experience. Television involves the experience of
what is less animate, for it involves a significant
reduction in (or loss of) visual experience. This
disintegration of the visual experience (as in the
dream) also results in an emotional disintegration
(i.e., anxiety). That television may be so
described (and even possible) is hard to imagine;
but this is consistent with the fact that it took
so very many different minds (and thoughts) of
genius in order to make the relatively unconscious
visual experience of the dream conscious. Since the
thinking that is involved in making the experience
of television possible is so enormously difficult,
it becomes difficult to think while partaking of
that experience. Television may be seen as an
accelerated form or experience of art, thereby
making someone less wary (or less anxious)
initially, but less creative and more anxious (as
time passes) as the advance of the self becomes
unsustainable. The experience (or effects) of
television demonstrates the interactive nature of
being and experience; for, in the dream, there is
also a reduction in the totality (or extensiveness)
of experience.
Thought involves a relative reduction in the
range and extensiveness of feeling. In keeping with
this, dreams make thought more like sensory
experience in general. Accordingly, both thought
and also the range and extensiveness of feeling are
proportionately reduced in the dream. (This
reduction in the range and extensiveness of feeling
during dreams is consistent with the fact that the
experience of smell very rarely occurs therein.)
Since there is a proportionate reduction of both
thought and feeling during dreams, the experience
of the body is generally (or significantly)
lacking; for thought is fundamentally rendered more
like sensory experience in general. Thoughts and
emotions are differentiated feelings. By involving
the mid-range of feeling between thought and sense,
dreams make thought more like sensory experience in
general. The reduction in the range and
extensiveness of feeling during dreams is why there
is less memory and thought therein.
Dream vision is generally closer (or flattened),
thereby resulting in a loss/reduction of peripheral
vision as well. Comparatively, television further
flattens vision; and it also involves a reduction
in peripheral vision.
In the dream, vision and thought are
semi-detached from touch (and feeling). One may or
may not be able to touch what is seen in the dream.
In the visual experience that is television, the
visual images may not be (and are not) touched at
all. In the case of waking vision, one can
[generally] touch what one sees.
It is not only in the dream that the vision of
each individual person is necessarily different.
That is obvious. Importantly, the experience of
television is uniquely that of the individual.
Television may be understood as a creation of
generalized thought. The ability of thought to
describe or reconfigure sense is ultimately
dependent upon the extent to which thought is
similar to sense.
Television makes thought even more like vision
than in the dream, thereby reducing thought and
vision. Thoughts are relatively shifting and
variable. Likewise, dream vision is relatively
shifting and variable. In the case (and form) of
television, the visual images become more shifting
and variable than that of the dream; and this is in
keeping with attention being compelled and
sustained in conjunction with these images being
even more like (or consistent with) thought. People
tend to believe what they see (and hear) during
television.
Ordinary (and natural) vision is removed and
replaced in the case of television. Unlike art,
which can be the interactive creation of any one
person, television is impossible for any one person
to possibly create or otherwise experience.
Television is an hallucination. Hallucinations
are already known to be connected with/associated
with/"caused by" all sorts of very serious
mental/physical/emotional conditions or disorders.
It is undeniable that this is a very important and
serious matter.
DiMeglio
Archive
Frank
Martin DiMeglio was born in Newport, Rhode Island.
He has had considerable success in managing,
understanding, and overcoming both depression and
anxiety, and he has been very actively engaged in
studying philosophy and psychology for the past 8
years. Mr. DiMeglio has a Bachelor of Science
degree (cum laude) in Geography and Environmental
Planning from Towson University (1987). He
currently lives in Middle River, Maryland, and he
is working on his second book.
Philosophy
Resource Center Articles & Essays
Index
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|