|
November 1, 2005
The New
Breed of Bioterrorism?
by David A. Yeagley, Ph.D.
Last
week, October
26, 2005, Behrouz Nahidmobarekeh was tried for
tampering with consumer products. He was convicted
the next day. He was caught on tape sprinkling
dried feces on donuts and pastries in a Dallas
grocery. Is this a new form of
bioterrorism?
It would be the most cost-efficient, using the
most easily attainable substance. Everyone knows
feces can carry Hepatitis
B, C, and D, as well as a host of other
infectious diseases like Shigella
and E. Coli. Yet Nahidmobarekeh's attorney
Clark
Birsall said there was no way to prove that
Nahidmobarekeh's actions would have harmed
anyone.
There are no DNA tests reported yet that even
prove the dried feces were Nahidmobarekeh's own,
though he apparently prepared them in his
apartment. The FBI
determined it was not a matter of national
security, so they turned Nahidmobarekeh over to
local authorities after they had arrested him.
Why, this was just the personal revenge of a
Middle Eastern sociopathic cab driver, who had "a
beef" with the store owners. Nahidmobarekeh said he
wanted to "teach them a lesson."
Not to worry?
Consider Iyad Abu El Hawa, of Baytown, Texas. He
is currently in jail for issuing more than 1,000
fake flue vaccinations to Exxon employees at a
company health fair. El Hawa's Houston-based
company, Comfort and Caring Home Health, contracted
to provide the vaccinations. The
first report (Baytown Sun, October 28,
2005) said they didn't know what was in the
fraudulent vaccinations. The
second report says it appeared to be "purified
water," but tests are not complete. Again the FBI
identified no risk to national security.
But there is no comfort in these reports. Rather
there is a new prospect of terrorism looming.
Remember, on October
31, 1999, when commercial pilot Gamil
Al-Batouti's EgyptianAir Flight 990 crashed without
cause near the island of Nantuckett? No one was
willing to imagine that less than two years later,
September 11, 2001, nineteen
Middle Eastern Islamic radicals would fly U.S.
passenger jets into the World Trade Center.
Shouldn't we reconsider these bioterrorism
stories?
Think of what has happened to the airline
industry here in America, and all over the world,
and the nearly intolerable inconvenience and
invasion of privacy which has resulted from the
radical, murderous inventions of few Islamacists.
The U.S. government is not willing to profile
Middle Easterners, but instead has made the
American public pay the price of "safety" by
surrendering freedoms.
Now think of all the people working in food
services and in the health industry. There are many
Islamic Middle Easterners in these professions. Are
we going to have to start 'checking bags' of all
health facilities employees as they show up to work
now? Are we going to start screening all employees
in food services before they start work? Are we
going to retard and denigrate our food and health
services now because of a new avenue of
bioterrorism?
Remember, no one imagined Egyptian pilot Gamil
Al-Batouti's isolated act was a precursor to 9/11.
Al-Batouti was considered "depressed," or mentally
ill. But look what followed. Were the 9/11 hijacker
mass murders "mentally ill"?
Remember, too, Joel
Hinrichs, the University of Oklahoma student
who blew himself up in an obviously
"terrorist-style" death. OU President David Boren
has insisted that Hinrichs was "emotionally
disturbed" from the hour the incident happened.
No risk to national security. (The FBI blew up
remaining evidence in Hinrichs' apartment the same
night of the bombing.)
But there is hardly an effective way to curb
public apprehension anymore. The facts of immediate
history outweigh any authoritarian attempt to
dismiss violent acts that clearly occur in the
shape of intentional public havoc. Death stalks the
country.
It may seem appropriate to associate
sociopathological and psychopathological behavior
with professional theory. Adlerian psychologist
Donald Lombardi says deviance is an effort to
achieve significance which, in the mind of the
perpetrator, is otherwise impossible. Lombardi's
Search for Significance (1975) was
considered ground-breaking.
But considering the terrorist ground-breaking at
Ground Zero in New York City, it simply doesn't
matter whether the perpetrator is mentally ill or
not. The patterns of destruction are all apparent
for anyone to grasp. And any person, be it a crazed
Islamicist, or a simply crazed individual, can
freely invent and indulge.
Our concern must be to secure our own freedoms.
How far will our society bend, and how much of our
freedom will we surrender, in order to provide
"freedom for all" -- including our mortal
enemies?
Yeagley
Archive
Dr. David A. Yeagley is a published scholar,
professionally recorded composer, and an adjunct
professor at the University of Oklahoma College of
Liberal Studies. He's on the speakers list of
Young America's
Foundation. E-mail him at badeagle2000@yahoo.com.
View his website at http://www.badeagle.com.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Feel free to respond to this article in
The
Radical Academy
Forum.
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|