|
October 16, 2008
Which
Candidate Would Make the Better Pirate?
by Edward Chupack
Author
of Silver
America, in a ritual that it undertakes every
four years, is about to elect a president. Our
choices for the highest office in the land are a
man who has done absolutely nothing in two years in
the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama, and a man that has
done too much for too long in the U.S. Senate, John
McCain.
How are we to judge a candidate that has not
enacted any legislation and must find it bothersome
to roll out of bed and vote, since he does so
little of it? How can we assess a candidate that
has voted in so many contrary ways for so long that
he would, if he could, vote against his own
legislation? We need a sure fire test to evaluate
these candidates.
We are not looking for a saint to be our next
president. A saint won't get us out of the economic
doldrums or blow up all the bad guys that need
blowing up in the next four years. Saints aren't
good at math (with the exception of keeping track
of sheep and lambs) or physical exertion (with the
exception of hurling heretics onto pikes). You
would never want to cheat off a saint during a
calculus test or pick a saint to be on your
softball team. We are also looking for someone
without many scruples. Someone with an oversized
sense of morality won't get the job done.
We need a pirate as president.
Pirates are quite good with numbers. They must
calculate costs and benefits on a regular basis.
They must, for instance, know how many hostages to
take and what the pay out will be for the hostages.
This, by the way, is not an easy calculation as
pirates must be on top of the value of different
currencies as well as the going rate for different
nationalities. A Euro or Yen is worth just so many
American dollars. A Somali or Nigerian is worth
just so many Peruvians.
Pirates are simply wonderful at murder. They can
cut, chop, hew and slice better than your local
butcher. They can explode, blast, burst and
detonate just about anything in so many imaginative
ways. The most our current candidates can probably
do is shake up a bottle of soda and spray the
contents over one of the demagogues or terrorist
chieftains roaming our planet.
Neither candidate has what it takes. Obama is
the equivalent of a certain type of sports fan, the
sort of fan that is known -- not so politely -- as
a "jock-sniffer". Obama is a jock-sniffer of
leftist radicals, a connoisseur of the sulphuric
set. McCain, for all his grit, has a rusty trigger
finger. He has not fired a weapon of any caliber in
anger in a long time and so we must wonder if he
has what it takes to annihilate a multitude of any
magnitude. Can he even assassinate his opponent's
character? He has had his chances.
These candidates are our only choices, and so
despite their shortcomings, we must decide which of
them would make the better pirate and therefore the
better president.
Could Obama walk bow-legged across a rolling
deck? I think not. He could not even stroll across
a patio pigeon-toed after a few beers. That man is
just too cool. McCain has a jaunty walk, and with
work he could at least develop a saunter.
Advantage: McCain.
Which candidate could drink more rum? Obama
seems like a Chardonnay man through and through,
maybe even a wine spritzer sort of fellow. He would
turn up his nose at rum unless he needed the Puerto
Rican vote, in which case he would have his
advisors swig rum like it was going out of style.
His advisors do everything for him anyway. McCain's
wife is a beer baroneess, and my guess is that
McCain could go for several tumblers of rum without
much prodding, or any other drink in sight. He did
serve in the Navy after all. Advantage: McCain.
Would Obama or McCain look better climbing the
rigging? Obama would not climb it. Again, he has
those advisors. They would climb for him. McCain
would be up the rigging in a jiffy, as soon as
someone told him that he could see down Sarah
Palin's blouse from up there. Advantage:
McCain.
Is Obama or McCain more practiced in deception?
McCain may have no idea what he is saying, but he
means it when he says it. Obama will say anything
to get elected, and has changed his positions a
number of times. I've got to go with Obama on this
one. Obama appears to be the better liar.
Advantage: Obama.
We now come to style. Which candidate would wear
a bandana and white gauze shirt open to the navel
with the panache that is so important to a pirate?
Is there an option here? Obama is the essence of
style. Granted his bandana would be Gucci and his
shirt Gaultier, but he seems more comfortable with
just about anything European than American anyway.
It is unfortunate that he can't run for president
of the European Union. McCain can pull an old
undershirt out of his closet and rip it for his
bandana, and maybe pop a few buttons on one of his
Brooks Brothers shirts, but "C'est la vie".
Advantage: Obama.
Which candidate would parley better with our
enemies? I don't understand McCain. He speaks in
short and choppy sentences, and I have difficulty
following his train of thought. I imagine that he
would only confuse our adversaries. Obama, however,
does have a silver tongue and might lull our foes
into forgetting that they hate us -- especially if
he promised them a tax cut or universal healthcare,
or any of the other policies that he has promised
but will never deliver because he'll be too busy
bailing out the banks.
We have a tie based on these criteria but
frankly, as I opined earlier, neither candidate
would really make a good pirate.
The American people need and deserve someone
without principles, a real rogue, a dastardly
individual that we can envision walking around the
oval office with a parrot. A scoundrel's scoundrel.
We had such a president once, and he would have
made a splendid pirate, and we treated him poorly.
We punished him for his aptitude for evil. We threw
him out of office and have not been the same nation
since we did so. Yes, he would have made an
excellent pirate, and now he is gone. He is
gone.
Whom else but he could help us in this grim
season, in our time of such need?
If only we could bring him back.
Richard Nixon.
©2008
Edward Chupack. All Rights Reserved. Published with
permission.
Edward
Chupack is an attorney for a major law firm. He
lives near Chicago. His first novel, Silver,
is available now from Thomas Dunne Books. To learn
more about Long John Silver, please visit
www.silverpirate.com.
|
"At
the start of Chupack's swashbuckling
debut, Long John Silver, yes, that Long
John Silver, faces hanging back in England
after a life of piracy on the seven seas.
But before he swings, the aging,
fever-ridden pirate is determined to tell
his fabulous story, so settle back, me
hearties, it's one hell of a tale. Some of
the old Treasure Island gang -- Ben Gunn,
Pew, Jim Hawkins -- return, but this is no
retelling of the original. Chupack is
particularly good at pirate dialogue
Murder, a map, ciphers and codes, and even
a bit of romance figure in Silver's rivet
ing narrative as well." -- Publisher's
Weekly
|
Order
at Amazon.com
Order
at Powell's Books
|
Article
& Essay Index
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|