|
April 1, 2007
Useful
Idiots: Back in style!
by Mark Alexander
From The Patriot Post
In addition to last week's anti-American marches
marking the fourth year of Operation
Iraqi Freedom, a gaggle of Hollywonk Glitterati
have proven, once again, that idiocy has no
limits.
I am referring, of course, to the loudest of the
"useful
idiots", AKA Sean Penn, Rosie O'Donnell and
Charlie Sheen.
While the motives of this trio of limousine-lib
national-security experts comport with those of
certain Demo-gogue
traitors on Capitol Hill, their rants are even
more incoherent than those of Barbra Streisand, Ted
Turner and Hanoi
Jane Fonda.
First up, Sean Penn, whose last major excursion
into public-policy matters was his comedic Katrina
recovery effort when his "rescue
boat" had to be rescued because it was taking
on water. Penn has now teamed up with ultra-Left
politicos like Reps. Dennis Kucinich, Barbara Lee,
Lynn Woolsey and Maxine Waters -- members of the
"Out of Iraq Caucus."
At a rally last week, Penn told a group of
disheveled protestors, "You [President
Bush]... and the smarmy pundits you have in
your pocket can take your war and shove it! Let's
unite not only in stopping this war, but in holding
this administration accountable."
Barbara Lee -- she of the solitary "no" vote
against removing the Taliban from power in
Afghanistan -- spoke on behalf of her cadre who
voted against additional funding for American
troops in Iraq, saying, "We can't afford to spend
one more dime or lose one more American or Iraqi
life on this illegal and un-winnable war."
Penn added, "The money that's spent on this war
would be better spent on building levees in New
Orleans and healthcare in Africa. Iraq is not our
toilet. It's a country of human beings whose lives
that were once oppressed by Saddam are now in
Dante's Inferno."
"Dante's Inferno"? Perhaps Penn has read Dante
Alighieri's 14th-century poem, Divine Comedy, but
missed Professor Miguel Asin Palacios's scholarly
20th-century analysis, "Islamic Eschatology and the
Divine Comedy." It may be more accurate to equate
Saddam's reign of terror (or "oppression" according
to Penn) with Dante's Inferno. But I digress.
Penn's patent accusation is that America's Armed
Forces have condemned the Iraqi people to a life of
torture and misery -- but he "supports the
troops."
Speaking of torture and misery, ABC talkinghead
Rosie O'Donnell took Penn's assertions even deeper
into fantasyland this week. O'Donnell, who
apparently moonlights as a mouthpiece for the mad
mullahs of Iran, told her ever-shrinking TV
audience, "I have one thing to say [about the
15 British sailors and marines being held hostage
by Iran's outlaw regime]. Gulf of Tonkin."
(Many historians believe that the reported attack
on a U.S. Naval vessel in the Gulf of Tonkin in
1964 was staged so that Lyndon Johnson could
justify increased military action against
Communists in North Vietnam.)
Apparently, O'Donnell has divined that the 15
Brits are sacrificial pawns in a staged event
intended to justify an attack on Iran.
O'Donnell, who has been a vociferous opponent of
OIF,
believes there is a much deeper conspiracy
originating with 9/11 -- this from her blog: "At
5:30 p.m. on 9/11/2001 WTC7 collapsed. Fire brought
down a steel building, and reduced it to rubble.
The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so
a perfect collapse was impossible... [WTC
7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of
Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of
corporate tax fraud, including Enron's), US Secret
Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with
more stock fraud records)..."
O'Donnell insists that 9/11 was part of a grand
conspiracy by the Bush administration and "Big Oil"
to wage war in the Middle East, with the objective
of controlling and profiting from oil. "Big Rosie"
supports her claim by insisting that those "steel
buildings" could only have imploded if secondary
explosives were used -- as if Operation Enduring
Freedom against al-Qa'ida
jihadis wouldn't have been justified had the
Twin Towers somehow withstood the barbaric
attack.
The principal peddler of the conspiracy theory
that the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11
attacks is actor/activist Charlie Sheen, who has
been arrested more than 50 times for theatrical
protests. His theoretical assumptions make Oliver
Stone's "JFK" look like a straight-news
documentary.
Sheen insists that the 9/11 hijackers could not
have succeeded without the Bush administration's
complicity: "It seems to me like 19 amateurs with
box cutters taking over four commercial airliners
and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels
like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of
questions."
Sheen plans to narrate a 9/11 propaganda film
called "Loose Change," which may be distributed
with help from billionaire Dallas Mavericks owner
Mark Cuban. This film is a moron-friendly version
of Michael Moore's infamous Fahrenheit
9/11. "It's a story that needs to be told,"
insists Sheen. "It's a story about the truth, and
the truth needs to be exposed. It's not just me,
not just the Hollywood community [that] is
standing up saying what you have given us doesn't
make sense."
What doesn't make sense is Penn, O'Donnell,
Sheen and the "true believers" they have amassed --
at least on first pass. But the explanation for
their break with reality is wrapped up in the
collective Pathology
of the Left.
In effect, adherents to conspiracy theories are
so insecure in their person that they can't handle
the truth. Thus, they become fanatical devotees of
"alternate realities," about which they believe
they possess special knowledge and insight, which,
in turn, creates a comfort zone for them.
Consider a widely circulated 9/11 conspiracy
diatribe entitled "9-11: Can You Handle The Truth?"
As with the aforementioned video, "Loose Change,"
this invective purports that the 9/11 attack was a
U.S. conspiracy. Ironically, in the first line of
his thesis, the author writes of those who believe
the government's account of 9/11: "A religious like
fervor cemented by fear and denial prevents most
people from acknowledging facts and easily-exposed
misrepresentations..." Ironic, because he has just
described himself and those who subscribe to his
thesis with a "religious like fervor cemented by
fear and denial."
(Of note, the pathology underlying conspiracy
adherents is quite similar to the cult pathology of
those who tenaciously cling to Albert Gore's
global
warming theories.)
As for Penn, Sheen, O'Donnell and their fellow
crackpots, may they sleep
well tonight knowing that our Armed Forces are
forever on the frontlines, forever vigilant,
forever defending their right to regurgitate such
rubbish.
The
Patriot Post
Copyright 2007 by Publius Press, Inc. and
reprinted with permission.
The
Patriot Post Archive
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|