|
September 21, 2007
White
Supremacists in the Mainstream Media
by Mark Alexander
From The Patriot Post
Earlier this year, I wrote a column titled
(Murder
in Black and White), which detailed the
torture, gang-rape and murder of a young couple,
Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. Their
five attackers -- four men and a woman -- dumped
his battered body by a train track and threw her
charred remains in a trash bin.
The point of that grim essay was to highlight
the mainstream media's disparate treatment of
interracial crimes.
Indeed, there are some 17,000 murders committed
in the U.S. each year, but this double murder was
clearly far more barbaric, far more monstrous than
most. Yet it never made a headline more than 20
miles from the crime scene -- not on NPR, not on
CNN or the networks, not in The Washington
Post, not in The New York Times.
Was the MSM's lack of interest in this case race
related, given that the two victims were white and
the five defendants are black?
Yes.
How do I know?
Consider this case in point: Last week, six
white West Virginia lowlifes were charged with the
kidnapping, torture and sexual assault of a
20-year-old black woman, Megan Williams. This was a
brutal crime, to be sure, but Megan Williams is
alive today, having been rescued by local sheriff's
deputies. Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom,
as we know, were not nearly so fortunate.
Within 24 hours of the arrests in the West
Virginia case, stories were headlined on CNN,
The Washington Post, The New York Times --
even the BBC -- and numerous reports have been
filed subsequently.
Was the MSM's acute interest in this case race
related?
Yes.
In fact, no sooner had Williams's attackers been
arrested than the FBI and federal prosecutors
joined the investigation to determine if the
victim's civil rights were violated, or if her
assault qualified as a "hate crime."
To this day, however, searches of the massive
news archives of CNN, The Washington Post
and The New York Times for the names
"Channon Christian" and "Christopher Newsome"
render exactly zero references to their names in
any news story -- that's nil, naught, zip and
zilch.
There is nothing unusual about the racial
component of the Christian and Newsom murders.
Indeed, while blacks represent just 12 percent of
the U.S. population, black perpetrators are
convicted by their peers in more than half
of all murder and manslaughter cases. In other
words, per capita, black-on-white crime is far more
prevalent than the inverse.
However, the contrast in how the MSM reported
these two cases betrays a prevalent
white-supremacist mindset among liberal
journalistic scribes.
By discounting the newsworthiness of
black-on-white crime such as the murders of
Christian and Newsom, and at the same time
trumpeting the newsworthiness of white-on-black
crime such as the assault on Williams, the MSM is,
in effect, insisting that white people should be
held to a higher standard than black people. In
doing so, the MSM is essentially saying, "It isn't
news when blacks prey on whites, because we expect
them to behave like vicious animals, but it is
headline news when whites prey on blacks, because
we expect whites to be more civilized."
Additional evidence of this underlying media
hypocrisy is substantiated through the MSM's
coverage of race-baiting opportunists who inject
themselves into racially charged criminal
cases.
For example, if a racially motivated hate group
like the KKK showed up to protest on behalf of
white defendants in a white-on-black crime, they
would rightfully be skewered by the media. However,
when racially motivated haters like Al Sharpton and
Jesse Jackson show up to protest on behalf of
defendants in a black-on-white crime, they are
canonized as civil rights saviors.
In fact, this week Sharpton and Jackson, with
more than ten thousand of their ilk in tow, swamped
the small town of Jena, Louisiana, to protest
charges against six black youths (the so-called
"Jena Six") for brutally beating and stomping a
white classmate -- charges that were reduced from
attempted murder to aggravated battery.
"You cannot have justice meted out based on who
you are rather than what you did," Sharpton argues,
implying that because the defendants in Jena are
black, and there was racial tension among the
youths, the charges are unjust. "This is the most
blatant example of disparity in the justice system
that we've seen. You can't have two standards of
justice." (Unless, of course, you consider
Sharpton's fabrication of the Tawana Brawley rape
hoax a "blatant example of disparity in the justice
system.")
According to Jackson, "Across this country,
there are two justice systems -- one for blacks and
one for whites. Black young men are not more likely
to commit crimes than whites, but they are more
likely to be stopped by police, more likely to be
arrested if stopped, more likely to be charged if
arrested, more likely to be jailed if convicted,
more likely to be charged with felonies and more
likely to be tried and imprisoned as adults."
Actually, black youth are far more likely to
commit crimes than white youth, and for that reason
they are more likely to be stopped by police
(including black police officers), more likely to
be arrested and, if charged, convicted (often by
black-majority juries).
District Attorney Reed Walters refuted the
claims of Sharpton and Jackson, saying, "This case
has been portrayed by the news media (emphasis
added) as being about race and the fact that it
takes place in a small Southern town lends itself
to that portrayal, but it is not and never has been
about race. It is about finding justice for an
innocent victim and holding people accountable for
their actions."
It is worth noting that neither Jackson nor
Sharpton offered a word of sympathy for the actual
assault victim.
Remarkably, Jackson complains, "This isn't just
a Southern problem. A study of five states in the
Northwest and Midwest showed that blacks are
incarcerated at ten times the rate of whites."
Indeed, this is not "just a Southern problem,"
but, in fact, a cultural problem. Too many black
men do not take responsibility for themselves or
their families, in part because racists like
Jackson and Sharpton have inculcated black folks
with the notion that they are "victims" of white
folks.
Of course, since Jackson fathered a child out of
wedlock with an aide (and then paid her $40,000
from his "nonprofit" Rainbow/PUSH Coalition for
"moving expenses"), he is not really in a position
to advocate for responsible
fatherhood.
Hoping that the Louisiana "injustice" will
jumpstart racial strife across the nation, Jackson
insists, "In Jena, the protest will begin, but it
won't end there. This situation is explosive -- not
only in Jena but across the country."
Meanwhile, back in West Virginia, the NAACP has
arrived on the scene to "monitor" justice in the
Williams case, and no doubt Sharpton and Jackson
will follow.
However, still no word on when "journalists" at
NPR, CNN, The Washington Post and The New
York Times will headline the torture, gang-rape
and murder of Channon
Christian and Christopher Newsom.
The
Patriot Post
Copyright 2007 by Publius Press, Inc.
The
Patriot Post Archive
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|