|
August
1, 2007
The Crimes of
Jews
Pottling
and Kettling
by Fred Reed
I get a steady rivulet of strange mail telling
how horrible Jews are. Apparently there is no crime
of which they are not guilty. I find myself
wondering: How do they find the time to be so evil?
Are they on amphetamines or something?
A curious odiousness runs through it. I don't
care whether you like Jews, but these birds need
their heads examined. Anyway, here's me on the
horribleness of Jews.
They can't compete with Christians.
The history of Christianity has been one of
murder, torture, and Stalinism, of witless
intolerance of things not intolerable and an utter
refusal to mind its own business. Look at the
record. Look at almost any part of the record. The
question is how to choose.
During the witch hunts of 1450-1700, god knows
how many tens of thousands of women were tortured
savagely and then burned alive, for the sin of
having a wart. This demonstration of God's love and
Christian charity was perpetrated not just by
Christians, but by the church.
Jews can't play in this league. They are
outclassed.
Then there was the Inquisition, run by that
infamous Jew Thomasberger Torquemadastein. (For
recent graduates of American universities, there
wasn't really a Jew by that name.) For centuries
countless people screamed for days as their
shoulders were torn from their sockets, before they
were burned alive, in Jesus' name, amen. This too
was a church operation, supported by such as their
Most Christian Majesties, Ferdinand and
Isabella.
I'm making a list of thousands of Christians
tortured to death by Jews. Wait. I'm
thinking
.
Much of this churchly barbarism has had Jews as
its target. Christians were always trying either to
kill Jews or to convert them. Why they thought it
was any of their business what Jews believed, or
Cathars, or Moslems, I do not know. If you didn't
agree with them, they would burn you. Just like
Jesus said to do.
If a king decided to go on a Crusade, which is
to say an explicitly Christian war, he started by
robbing the local Jews to pay for it. (Christians
allowed Jews to work only as bankers and
moneylenders, and then complained that they were
bankers and moneylenders. The logic scintillates.)
The army, typically a mob of illiterate louts,
massacred Jews along the way and, if they took
Jerusalem, they burned the synagogue with the Jews
in it. Jesus loves me, this I know
.
The sordid tale of Christian compassion
continued through the Reformation and beyond. In
1692 the unpleasantly Christian people of Salem,
Massachusetts killed 21 (if memory serves) people
for being witches. The victims weren't Jews,
probably because the good people of Salem couldn't
find any. In the American South, the Christian
churches of the time upheld slavery as God's will,
and these were preachers who saw what slavery
really was. We have since romanticized it as happy
nigras pluckin' de banjo and grinning a lot. In
fact it was godawful. Check the Spanish
Christianization of South America.
Certainly as late as 1882 the Catholic Church
was saying that the killing of Christian children
by Jews at Easter was "a common practice" and that
for the sacrifice to be effective the child had to
die "under torment." (Giuseppe Oreglia de San
Stefano, SJ, quoted in Hitler's Pope, by
John Cornwall, page 42 in the Spanish edition. If
Pius XII wasn't an ally of Hitler, he sure
simulated it well.) This is sick, evil stuff, and
it runs through Christianity like marbling in
steak.
By comparison, Jews are pikers. You might as
well compare a shoplifter to the Boston
Strangler.
Then there's Israel. I don't like what the Jews
are doing in Israel, and neither do a lot of
Israelis, but it is amusing to compare the crimes
of Israel with those of, say, the US. America has
caused the death of far more people in Iraq than
Israel has killed Palestinians, and with far less
excuse.
Note the double standard. When Israel kills kids
in bombing attacks, it is a crime, but when the US
regularly does the same thing in Iraq, Afghanistan,
and Somalia, it's just collateral damage, necessary
to bring democracy to people who didn't ask for it,
and anyway it didn't happen, and besides it was an
isolated incident, meaning one that was detected,
and of course the dead were all terrorists,
toddlers and all. Throw in the carnage in Vietnam,
another American war started on lies, and the rise
of Pol Pot, directly attributable to the war next
door, and Israel looks like a pretty wet squib,
crimewise.
Judge both countries by the same measure, say
I.
Few do. Countries are built on bullshit. Part of
Israel's bullshit is that the Palestinians left in
1948 because they wanted to, Jews being highly
moral and incapable of atrocities or ethnic
cleansing. Part of America's bullshit is
essentially identical: Americans are highly
principled people and do not commit the atrocities
that, for example, they documentably commit daily
in Iraq. You might ask the Indians about ethnic
cleansing. I note that Israel's Arab citizens are
better treated than American blacks were in
1950.
I'm always willing to believe the worst of
people, and it's certainly the way to bet, but Jews
do not have the solid credentials of savagery that
Christianity does. I guess they just lack
spirit.
Yet still I get the strange mail. I have
wondered why the weird hostility to Jews. It is
weird. I loathe a lot of people, and constantly try
to add to the list, but I'm not obsessive about it.
People who worry about Jews are obsessive. It eats
them up. They see Jews peeking from everywhere.
When the New York Times, a Jewish paper,
supported Bush's war on Iraq, as did almost the
whole country, it was on orders from Jerusalem.
When the Times turned editorially against
the war, as had almost the whole country, it was to
Stab Our Boys in the Back. You know, the leftwing
anti-American Jew media. Everything whatever is
controlled by Jews, with malign purpose. Why?
Charles Murray, who isn't, is the coauthor of
The Bell Curve. Writing in
Commentary, a Jewish magazine, he notes the
following:
- In IQ the average American Jew is at the
75th percentile. Six times as many Jews as
others have an IQ of better than 140. .The
imbalance increases for still higher IQ's. In
1954, on an IQ test given to all kids in the
public schools of New York, of those scoring
above 170, 24 of 28 were Jews. This is neither
new nor debatable. Those who study such things,
most of whom are not Jewish, have known it for
decades.
Writes Murray, "In the first half of the 20th
century, despite pervasive and continuing social
discrimination against Jews throughout the Western
world, despite the retraction of legal rights, and
despite the Holocaust, Jews won 14 percent of Nobel
Prizes in literature, chemistry, physics, and
medicine/physiology. In the second half of the 20th
century, when Nobel Prizes began to be awarded to
people from all over the world, that figure rose to
29 percent. So far, in the 21st century, it has
been 32 percent. Jews constitute about two-tenths
of one percent of the world's population. You do
the math." Uh
yeah.
If you say on the web that Jews are smart, you
get furious mail saying no they aren't, no they
aren't, no...they...are NOT, in a
rising scream. This leaves the writers in the
interesting position of saying that Jews control
publishing, television, the press, retail,
wholesale, Hollywood, Wall Street, international
banking, the research institutions, the schools,
and the universities. But they aren't very smart.
(I forgot planetary motion. They control planetary
motion.) (And watermelon futures. Never forget
watermelon futures)
In my experience of Jews, which is considerable,
they aren't just bright but, worse, they respect
intelligence and scholarship, in anybody. If you
speak three languages or play a good game of chess
or made high scores on your GREs, they are likely
to say, "Geez, that's really good." With Jews,
being a nerd doesn't carry the opprobrium it does
elsewhere. Maybe nerds dress funny, but they're
smart. Jewish women are unmistakeably attracted to
smart men. (They seem to prefer smart Gentiles to
smart Jewish men, but that's another matter.)
This sets the stage for trouble. The United
States is a profoundly anti-intellectual country,
and Jews are a profoundly intellectual people. They
tend to look like space aliens to much of the
country. In America, (or Mexico, for that matter)
smart is tolerated, barely. If a Gentile kid pops
high on his SATs or grabs a Merit scholarship, he
can still be socially accepted as long as he shows
that he didn't really mean it. Any bright kid runs
into this. Jews don't see things this way.
And of course Jews are usually urban. Take
people who are bright, culturally inclined towards
things intellectual, who live in cities and have a
cosmopolitan outlook, and you get people who are
fluently conversant with books, the arts, politics,
other countries, and such like. They regard this
fluency as very much a good thing. So do I. What
exactly is the problem?
Being smart, they rise, especially in a
brain-intensive civilization, and then seem to
control things, and to an extent do, and the rest
resent them. (Hitler detested Jews as a genetically
inferior people who dominated German intellectual
life.) It is easy to hate what you feel inferior
to. This is why people who disliked the Russians
hated the French, why people who merely dislike
blacks hate Jews. It was impossible to feel
inferior to Russians, who wore bad suits. Just as
in the band-saw shriek of feminists, "We are too
equal," there is audible a fear that maybe they
aren't, in the anti-Semites insistence, "They did
it by conspiring," there is a worry that maybe they
didn't.
Reed
Archive
Copyright 2007 by Fred Reed and reproduced here by
permission of the author.
About
the Author (by the author):
Fred Reed is a Marine combat veteran, police
reporter, amateur biochemist, former long-haul
hitchhiker, and part-time sociopath living in
Mexico. Fred, a keyboard mercenary with a
disorganized past, has worked on staff for Army
Times, The Washingtonian, Soldier of Fortune,
Federal Computer Week, and The Washington
Times. He has been published in Playboy,
Soldier of Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, Harper's, National Review, Signal,
Air&Space, and suchlike. He has worked as a
police writer, technology editor, military
specialist, and authority on mercenary soldiers. He
is by all accounts as looney as a tune.
Visit the "Fred
on Everything" website to read his previous
columns and sign up for his regular e-mail
feature.
|
The essays in A Brass Pole in
Bangkok, are sometimes wildly funny,
sometimes deadly serious, always merciless
in their unmasking of the pretenses and
charlatans of society. Fred, a former
Marine, subscribes to no ideology ("an
ideology is just a systematic way of
misunderstanding the world") but
exuberantly wreaks havoc on practically
everything, and delights in everything
else: the psychotherapy swindle, squalling
feminists, race racketeers, damn fool
wars, red-light districts in Asia, and
tequila fests in Mexico, where he
lives.
A
Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire To
Be, by Fred Reed
|
|
|
Buy Fred's new reprehensible book,
Nekkid In Austin! Another
collection of Fred's collected outrages,
irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry
from "Fred On Everything" and some
innocent magazines that, he says,
foolishly published him. Wildly funny,
sometimes wacky, always provocative essays
on the collapse of America.
Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a
Well, by Fred Reed
|
|
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|