|
March
18, 2008
Fixing
America
Fred
Clears Everything Up
by Fred Reed
I was working on my novel about cybercrime (I'm
calling it "Buffer the Overflow Slayer") involving
a girl Goth computer whizz named Monitor Lewinski,
when a programmer friend emailed me about losing
his job because it was outsourced to India. This
alarmed me. It seemed unjust that only American
programmers should lose their jobs. On reflection,
I came up with a way to ensure that they all go
unemployed, thus leveling the playing field. I hope
they are grateful.
Here's my plan. We regard a computer as one long
binary number -- RAM, disk drives, registers, all
of it. The order is arbitrary but doesn't matter as
long as it doesn't change during the process. Set
it to zero. Then begin incrementing it by one. At
each iteration, write the number down
somewhere.
This will generate all possible machine states,
and therefore all programs possible to run on that
computer.
Of course most of these numbers will not
represent programs. It will therefore be necessary
to have graduate assistants check each stored
number to see whether it does anything. Perhaps
they could run it through a disassembler to get
readable code, or maybe try each to see what
happened. Those which turned out to be programs
they would store in an archive, labeled by the
program's function.
Now, it's true that there would be a
considerable number of these long numbers,
specifically 2 ^ (number of bistable devices). On a
machine with two terabytes of storage, the number
would approximate 2 ^ (8 x 2 x 10 ^ 12). Thus
analyzing them all would take a certain amount of
effort, but that's what graduate assistants are
for. Give them lots of strong coffee and potato
chips and they'll go at it like badgers.
You would end up with a list of all programs
possible, ordered by function. Programming would
become a simple matter of referencing a look-up
table. Calculations from the area of a circle to
abstruse matters of computational fluid dynamics
would be there at your fingertips. No more onerous
fiddling with FORTRAN or C++. This will be a boon
for people with a phobia for curly brackets. I am
sure that the American Psychological Association
will be interested.
Having thought of all this, I was basking in my
own brilliance when it occurred to me that I had
only looked into the shallow end of the pool. The
list of machine states, I realized, would contain
not only all programs, but also the state of the
machine after running each of these programs. Yes!
We would have not only all programs, but all
answers! It would be necessary to have the graduate
assistants associate each program with its results,
but, well, brewing coffee is cheaper than hiring
programmers. Even Indian ones. When they had
finished, you would simply look up your program,
versions of which would include the outcome for all
possible data, and find the answer next to it.
An additional advantage would be that you would
no longer need the computer, just the look-up
table. This would be hard on IBM, but it's a
dog-eat-dog world, and none can advance unless some
fall behind. Otherwise you couldn't tell that they
had advanced.
Another service that I propose to undertake for
the betterment of society is to sue Intel
Corporation for fraud, licentious commercialism,
mopery with intent to gawk, and deceptive business
practices. The company has been abusing the public
for too long. It is time to act.
Intel is now selling a chip which, it claims
with a straight face, in front of God and
everybody, contains two billion transistors. Sure
it does. And I'm Ivar the Boneless.
I mean, think about it. A CPU is somewhere
between the size of a thumbnail and a postage
stamp. Do you think two billion of anything
can fit on something that size? Especially
transistors. I remember seeing my first transistor
in 1957. It looked like a three-legged aspirin
tablet -- a little pill with wires coming out of it
-- or maybe a miniature milking stool. Just
possibly you could have fit three of them on a
chip, if you used a hammer. Two billion? Maybe on a
tennis court.
That people believe this sort of thing is a
measure of the decay of the American mind. You
couldn't have fooled Davy Crockett with such stuff.
Today the schools take malleable kids and teach
them so much obvious rubbish, or rubbish that ought
to be obvious, that they begin to believe anything
at all. Such as that they need a new iPod every
week or their lives will be blighted. They believe
in molecules, though they have never seen one, in
electrons, though nobody has ever seen one. They
believe in astrology, evolution, Creation, and the
FDIC. They believe in Mars, for God's sake. (I put
one of those NASA photos in Photoshop and blew it
up, Way in the distance I found a billboard, blurry
but legible, saying "Pedro's Cat Tacos." Arizona, I
tell you.)
Intel's trickery is obvious. How do they know
that the chip has two billion transistors? Who has
counted them? Assume that you could count a
thousand an hour, or about twenty-five thousand a
day -- if you did it in shifts. Call it two hundred
thousand a week. The chip hasn't been in existence
long enough for us to know how many transistors it
has.
"Ah, but Fred," you say, "the bugger
works. How do you explain that?
I didn't say it didn't work, just that
transistors have nothing to do with it. I figure
it's powered by spirits from a parallel universe --
little tiny spirits. They may be green. They work
for nothing and don't require visas. Think graduate
assistants, but more compact.
Actually, I think all of the space program is a
scam. I mean, suppose I came to you and asked you
to give me three billion inflating green ones to
build a Jupiter probe.
"What's Jupiter?" you might ask, wisely.
"Oh, it's a planet."
"Yeah? Who says?"
"Uh, well, Dr. Fulano de Tal. He's very
important and resounding, and works for NASA."
"Uh-huh. You're all in it together." It's true.
Everybody who works on a Jupiter probe is connected
to the space program. Pretty suspicious.
If you gave me the money, I'd get a web
server somewhere in the Central African Republic
and put some pictures of the Sahara on it with a
red filter, and tell you we had landed on the Red
Spot of Jupiter and what a splendid triumph it was
for the United States, sing the anthem. Then I'd
make a Swiss bank very happy.
Reed
Archive
Copyright 2008 by Fred Reed and reproduced here by
permission of the author.
About
the Author (by the author):
Fred Reed is a Marine combat veteran, police
reporter, amateur biochemist, former long-haul
hitchhiker, and part-time sociopath living in
Mexico. Fred, a keyboard mercenary with a
disorganized past, has worked on staff for Army
Times, The Washingtonian, Soldier of Fortune,
Federal Computer Week, and The Washington
Times. He has been published in Playboy,
Soldier of Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, Harper's, National Review, Signal,
Air&Space, and suchlike. He has worked as a
police writer, technology editor, military
specialist, and authority on mercenary soldiers. He
is by all accounts as looney as a tune.
Visit the "Fred
on Everything" website to read his previous
columns and sign up for his regular e-mail
feature.
|
The essays in A Brass Pole in
Bangkok, are sometimes wildly funny,
sometimes deadly serious, always merciless
in their unmasking of the pretenses and
charlatans of society. Fred, a former
Marine, subscribes to no ideology ("an
ideology is just a systematic way of
misunderstanding the world") but
exuberantly wreaks havoc on practically
everything, and delights in everything
else: the psychotherapy swindle, squalling
feminists, race racketeers, damn fool
wars, red-light districts in Asia, and
tequila fests in Mexico, where he
lives.
A
Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire To
Be, by Fred Reed
|
|
|
Buy Fred's new reprehensible book,
Nekkid In Austin! Another
collection of Fred's collected outrages,
irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry
from "Fred On Everything" and some
innocent magazines that, he says,
foolishly published him. Wildly funny,
sometimes wacky, always provocative essays
on the collapse of America.
Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a
Well, by Fred Reed
|
|
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|