|
April
15, 2008
On Generals
Testifying Before Congress
A Mash
Note
by Fred Reed
Whenever I see that some dismal general will
testify to Congress regarding the war against Iraq,
I imagine the first paragraph of his Power Point
presentation:
"All metrics show a downsurge in the violence in
Iraq, and a continuing improvement in indicators of
the production of a better life. Next slide. The
Iranians are aiding the enemies of America, and
must be bombed. This is a recording."
What solemn, fraudulent, emetic mummery.
Congressmen will -- do -- ask the General puffball
questions, after which they will do whatever the
President tells them to do. I can make no criticism
of this. It is the American way. Still, may I
suggest a few questions I would like to see the
General, any general, asked?
1) General, five years ago the Commander in
Chief said that combat operations in Iraq had
ended. Since this isn't true, the Commander in
Chief was either lying, delusional, or simply a
fool. Which do you believe to be the case?
2) You have said on various occasions that Iran
is meddling in Iraq, that it is supplying weapons,
fighters, and training to the warring factions.
Others have charged that the United States is
meddling in Iraq, that it is supplying weapons,
troops, and training in Iraq. Which of these
assertions do you believe to be the more accurate?
Have you seen any evidence of American
involvement?
3) You have expressed a commendable admiration
for our soldiers, saying that they are the finest
young men of our nation. Would you let your
daughter date a black Pfc. with a GED? A kid named
Gonzalez with tattoos?
4) Permit me a personal question, General. Have
you ever said anything but "yes" to anyone who
could affect your chances of promotion? Can you
give us examples?
I have received a letter from a squad leader in
Baghdad who suggests that always saying "yes"
qualifies you as a streetwalker but not as a
soldier. I am sure this isn't true. That is, I am
sure you could be a soldier as well. Will you
explain to us why the sergeant is wrong? Can you
give the Congress a reason to believe that anything
other than your career matters to you?
5) Excuse me, but I have a question concerning
your health. I know the sun is very bright in
Baghdad. Might it be that when you were putting
suntan lotion on your face, you somehow missed your
nose? It seems much darker. The country cannot
lightly afford to risk skin cancer in its
officers.
6) General, years from now, when you loll in
some sunny clime writing your memoirs, perhaps
having served as a handsome and chiseled Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs, tens of thousands of enlisted
men will be living with colostomy bags or white
canes or missing legs or the ruins of faces. Does
this in any way bother you?
On second thought, I withdraw the question as
irrelevant. Pardon my foolishness, General.
7) I assume that you must have many
qualifications for administering a
counterinsurgency operation in the Middle East.
Here I mean things other than being photogenic or a
wizard with Power Point. For example, I am certain
that you speak Arabic well, as do the Commander in
Chief, President Cheney, and Condo Rice. For the
record, will you confirm this?
8) Let me drop for a moment into the dry details
of soldiering. No doubt this will be boring shop
talk to many in this chamber, but I believe we can
spare a moment.
A constituent who served in Viet Nam wrote me
with the following account of someone who has
"taken a round" (that is the military phrase, I
believe?) through the face. He says that teeth
shatter, the jawbone dangles from the head with
white stuff showing where it was attached, blood
spurts from the arteries in the top of the mouth,
one eye bulges out from the concussion, and the man
jerks his arms strangely and says "Kuh-kuh-kuh"
until he dies from drowning in blood. This takes a
few minutes, the sergeant says.
Do you believe the Public Affairs Office of the
Pentagon is right in saying that squads should
carry plastic bags for covering the man's face? So
that reporters don't take pictures and give the
public a misleading idea of the war?
9) Critics of the military say harsh and, I am
sure, unjustified things, such as that generals are
simply hired murderers and have no more honor or
morality that hit men for the Mafia. I want you to
understand that I do not for a moment believe this.
I am sure that you would not kill thousands of
people you don't know on command of some nonentity,
and then accept strange-looking medals for doing
so. To rebuke those voices that say such ugly
things, would you give us an example of a country
you would not attack if ordered to? Name something
you would not do for another star?
10) Will you explain the surgical use of a
five-hundred-pound bomb in a densely populated
suburb?
11) General, if an Iraqi army attacked your home
state in an endeavor to impose democracy on the
United States, killed thousands of your fellow
citizens, and left your daughter of seven years
screaming as she died of burns, what would you do?
Would you accept Islam with gratitude and embrace
democracy? Or would you fight the invaders? Would
you spend the rest of your life trying to kill as
many of them as you could, in any way that you
could? Just curious.
12) Some of your critics, sir -- misinformed, I
am sure -- say that you send kids from small
Southern towns to die while you work on your Power
Point presentations. To put this foul canard to
rest, would you tell us how much time you have
spent in combat as compared to a rifleman on his
fifth tour?
13) Finally, General, can you estimate the
number of veterans in wheelchairs, blind, gutshot,
lacking genitals, on crutches, having nightmares of
when Jim Dog took a round through the lungs north
of Vung Tau -- guys of that sort, in the Disabled
American Veterans, in expat bars around the world,
in upcountry Thailand and the middle of Mexico --
who hate men like you with a dark intensity that
makes them pull the arms off chairs when they think
about it, so that even their friends back away, a
hatred that would make it most unwise for you to be
near?
Just asking. And thank you so much. For your
testimony, I mean.
Reed
Archive
Copyright 2008 by Fred Reed and reproduced here by
permission of the author.
About
the Author (by the author):
Fred Reed is a Marine combat veteran, police
reporter, amateur biochemist, former long-haul
hitchhiker, and part-time sociopath living in
Mexico. Fred, a keyboard mercenary with a
disorganized past, has worked on staff for Army
Times, The Washingtonian, Soldier of Fortune,
Federal Computer Week, and The Washington
Times. He has been published in Playboy,
Soldier of Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, Harper's, National Review, Signal,
Air&Space, and suchlike. He has worked as a
police writer, technology editor, military
specialist, and authority on mercenary soldiers. He
is by all accounts as looney as a tune.
Visit the "Fred
on Everything" website to read his previous
columns and sign up for his regular e-mail
feature.
|
The essays in A Brass Pole in
Bangkok, are sometimes wildly funny,
sometimes deadly serious, always merciless
in their unmasking of the pretenses and
charlatans of society. Fred, a former
Marine, subscribes to no ideology ("an
ideology is just a systematic way of
misunderstanding the world") but
exuberantly wreaks havoc on practically
everything, and delights in everything
else: the psychotherapy swindle, squalling
feminists, race racketeers, damn fool
wars, red-light districts in Asia, and
tequila fests in Mexico, where he
lives.
A
Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire To
Be, by Fred Reed
|
|
|
Buy Fred's new reprehensible book,
Nekkid In Austin! Another
collection of Fred's collected outrages,
irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry
from "Fred On Everything" and some
innocent magazines that, he says,
foolishly published him. Wildly funny,
sometimes wacky, always provocative essays
on the collapse of America.
Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a
Well, by Fred Reed
|
|
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|