|
July
13, 2009
Baez, Coyne,
and Reed
All the
Answers You'll Ever Need
by Fred Reed
Last night Vi and I watched for the first time a
documentary, shot by my friend Jim Coyne, on Joan
Baez and the movement against a war no one any
longer remembers, far away, on another planet. It
was lovely filmwork. Jim is a genius. I may have to
stop having friends. I feel inferior to all of
them. It gets depressing.
Of no interest to anyone but me, perhaps, it
completely changed my understanding of Baez, whom I
had regarded for forty years as just another pretty
voice. No. Smart, tough, principled in a world that
isn't. I hereby apologize.
In that war -- I forget what planet it was on --
the freaks and professors and mothers and the
simply decent finally managed stop the carnage,
though only after the Pentagon had killed 60,000
American kids and a million or so Vietnamese, not
to mention devastating Laos and bringing Pol Pot to
power. God I'm proud. We're such a force for
democracy.
When the GIs left Asia in '73, the commie
peaceniks thought they had won. And they had, for
ten minutes. The grip of the military on the
country loosened briefly.
Unfortunately the soldiers learned. Not how to
win wars, which they do poorly if at all, but how
to keep a war going. Winning a war isn't all it's
cracked up to be. The promotions and contracts
stop. When you are paid to do something, it is in
your interest not to finish doing it.
The Pentagon's first lesson learned was to avoid
conscription, as the conscripted and their families
will take to the streets. By using an army of
volunteer suckers about whom nobody of importance
cares, the military severs its wars from most of
the country, which loses interest. The brass are
then free to do as they choose.
The second lesson learned was that while
defeating the enemy is not necessary, and perhaps
not desirable, controlling the press is everything.
And they did it.
So forty or so years after all the love-ins, the
marches, the righteous dope (all of which may seem
silly, but in my view preferable to watching a
Cambodian mother screaming over the opened bleeding
guts of her child) the Pentagon is at it again.
Once more the jets howl over remote primitive
countries, countries that did nothing to the US and
couldn't have, and promotions flow, and contracts,
and generals demand more troops and more money to
stop communism. Excuse me, terrorism. Soon, the
Chinese, a better threat, coming to a theater near
you. With the passing of years, one demon fades
into another. Switching enemies is much easier now,
what with search-and-replace.
But it's all about democracy and freedom and
patriotism and Saving America from
from
something. The hoopla changes little, and how well
it works. Patriotic friends sometimes say to me of
the military ardent things like, "When your country
says go, you go!" I seldom point out that no
one in their families is in the slightest danger of
having to go, nor that "the country" is recruiting
hard and they aren't urging their children to
enlist; nor do I ask, "What is your attitude toward
having your daughter drafted onto the streets of
Baghdad for five tours, perhaps coming back
drooling and gurbling for life after having her
brains scrambled by a roadside bomb?" Patriotism is
important to patriots. They are full of it, and I'm
about a quart low. I shut up. I don't want to lose
friends.
Yet
I think I must be a communist. It seems
to me that when your country says "go," you should
ask, "Why?" Do you have a reason to kill whoever
you are being sent to kill? Then go. Otherwise,
don't. If I told you to go to Ottawa and kill
Canadians, you would think me mad, and think it
correctly. Why then should you obediently kill them
because a politician in Washington tells you to do
it? I do not understand.
And of course "your country" doesn't tell you
anything at all. Countries are abstractions. Men
tell you to go, and for their own purposes: Dick
Cheney or George Bush, Nixon or Nitze, or the men
who run the petroleum industry, or people in the
Israeli lobby, or men in the military companies who
want contracts, or officers who want to give war a
try.
Why are these people "my country"? And why isn't
Joan Baez my country instead of David Petraeus? I
will choose who is my country, thank you. Ledbelly,
Benny Goodman, Carl Perkins and Miss Emily Anne
will come before Lemay, McNamara, Lyndon Johnson,
and Obama. Long before.
Soldiers talk much of honor. I do not understand
how military service can possibly be thought
honorable. If the Wehrmacht were landing in North
Carolina, yes, but I do not believe that it is.
Where is the honor in bombing from the air lightly
armed peasants who can't fight back? It is
cowardly, yes, and obscene, but do not talk of
honor. Murder for hire is murder for hire.
We now have men who sit at screens, drinking
coffee and firing missiles from remote robotic
aircraft at people on the ground whom they cannot
identify. Brave men, they. I could burst into a
kindergarten and kill the children with a ball bat.
The one is as honorable as the other.
Recently I saw on television a black sergeant in
Afghanistan, probably chosen by his commander for
photogenicity, standing in front of a tank or
mobile gun, I forget which. He said something
scripted like "This is a such-and-such unit, the
most powerful fighting force in the world." This
sort of ritual cockiness is carefully ingrained.
Near my barracks in Parris Island was a sign, "The
most dangerous thing in the world is a Marine
rifleman." If it had said "an ambitious colonel" it
would have come closer to truth.
But one may wonder (unless one already knows)
how good the Pentagon's military really is. A
pissed-off peasant with an RPG would seem on the
evidence more effective than the pricey zoom-kapows
arrayed against him.
I cannot endorse the politics of the Taliban. If
one of them told me that my daughter couldn't go to
school, one of us would leave the room on a
stretcher. Yet as fighting men, are they not
magnificent? They have only rifles, explosives,
RPGs, and balls. Their enemies have unlimited air
support, helicopters, armor, artillery,
sophisticated communications, night-vision gear,
good food and excellent medical care. The Taliban
take heavy casualties, their enemies almost none.
The ragheads do not even have PX privileges. Yet
they have not been defeated. A fight on even terms
would last perhaps five minutes.
This, for a trillion dollars.
What the hell. Plus ca change, plus ca
doesn't. Next year in Beijing. Tell you what,
though. I never liked Kum Ba Yah, and "We Shall
Overcome" is probably the sappiest song every
written. But those people had nothing to be ashamed
of.
Reed
Archive
Copyright 2009 by Fred Reed and reproduced here by
permission of the author.
About
the Author (by the author):
Fred Reed is a Marine combat veteran, police
reporter, amateur biochemist, former long-haul
hitchhiker, and part-time sociopath living in
Mexico. Fred, a keyboard mercenary with a
disorganized past, has worked on staff for Army
Times, The Washingtonian, Soldier of Fortune,
Federal Computer Week, and The Washington
Times. He has been published in Playboy,
Soldier of Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Washington Post, Harper's, National Review, Signal,
Air&Space, and suchlike. He has worked as a
police writer, technology editor, military
specialist, and authority on mercenary soldiers. He
is by all accounts as looney as a tune.
Visit the "Fred
on Everything" website to read his previous
columns and sign up for his regular e-mail
feature.
|
The essays in A Brass Pole in
Bangkok, are sometimes wildly funny,
sometimes deadly serious, always merciless
in their unmasking of the pretenses and
charlatans of society. Fred, a former
Marine, subscribes to no ideology ("an
ideology is just a systematic way of
misunderstanding the world") but
exuberantly wreaks havoc on practically
everything, and delights in everything
else: the psychotherapy swindle, squalling
feminists, race racketeers, damn fool
wars, red-light districts in Asia, and
tequila fests in Mexico, where he
lives.
A
Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire To
Be, by Fred Reed
|
|
|
Buy Fred's new reprehensible book,
Nekkid In Austin! Another
collection of Fred's collected outrages,
irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry
from "Fred On Everything" and some
innocent magazines that, he says,
foolishly published him. Wildly funny,
sometimes wacky, always provocative essays
on the collapse of America.
Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a
Well, by Fred Reed
|
|
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
|