|
June
8, 2007
A Message For
Two Friends
by Gerald A. Honigman
Don't
do it!
There is a better way.
Recent reports tell of Turkey crossing the Iraqi
border in pursuit of Kurdish terrorists tied to the
Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK).
I will call them terrorists, even though
I have misgivings doing so.
Since their victims have included innocents, in
addition to military targets, I will do this.
I have misgivings because Arabs who deliberately
target Jewish innocents are routinely called
"militants" by the same folks who are quick to call
Kurds terrorists. And even the Kurds' terrorists
don't seek the destruction of Turkey
just
justice for their people. Now think about what
Hamas, Hizbullah, Islamic Jihad, Abbas and his
sweet-talking Fatah Arafatians, and so forth have
planned for Israel--with or without the disputed
territories.
While I don't advocate violence against the
Turkish military either, the latter has been, after
all, the tool by which the subjugation of about one
fifth of Turkey's seventy million people who are
Kurds has been carried out.
Over the past century in particular, after the
collapse of the Ottoman Turkish Empire in the wake
of World War I, the Kurds were renamed Mountain
Turks, had their language and culture outlawed,
etc. and so forth to insure that the new,
constricted Turkey which arose with Mustafa
Kemal--Ataturk--would suffer no further
geographical losses.
I applaud the Turks for many reasons.
When Spain was holding inquisitions and exiling
some of my own relatives, the Turks took them
in.
Turkey has been a valuable ally of America and
has resisted Islamic extremism better than any
other Muslim country.
Turkey has relatively good relations with
Israel
especially when its relations with
neighboring Syria take a dive.
So, I truly wish nothing but good for our
Turkish friends.
But friends should be able to disagree and
remain friends.
Not long ago, when Israel went after Hamas
terror masters, Turkey was quick to criticize
Israel and lecture her about the need to create the
Arabs' 22nd state and second, not first, one
in "Palestine"--Jordan having surfaced on some 80%
of the original April 25, 1920 territory over the
past century.
Turkey knows full well what the Arabs' plans are
for the Jewish State, yet makes these demands
anyway.
As I've pointed out before, Turkey is almost
forty times as large as Israel geographically and
eleven times as large in population. Despite this,
it sees nothing wrong, after demanding the creation
of the Arabs' 22nd state, with telling
thirty million truly stateless Kurds--who
have been massacred and subjugated in all the lands
where they have lived in the new nationalist
era--that they must remain forever in that
stateless condition because of the potential threat
independence in Iraqi Kurdistan might have to
Turkey. The Turks fear the effect this will have on
their own large, adjacent Kurdish population.
The fear is well founded, and I understand
it.
A look at what is now happening in Kosovo/Kosova
is a case in point.
The Turks defeated the Serbs there in 1389. What
would later be named Albania became Muslim with
continuing Turkish conquests of the region.
Turn the clock ahead six centuries, and ethnic
Muslim Albanians have spread outside of their
independent state of Albania into an ethnically
fractured Yugoslavia held together only by the glue
of Marshal Tito. When he died, all knew that
Yugoslavia's days were numbered.
Indeed
America led the dismemberment.
Some say that America needed to show that it was
supporting Muslims elsewhere since it was also in
conflict with them in so many other places.
And now, there is a drive to create an
independent Muslim Albanian Kosova in traditional
Serb lands
in addition to the already existing
Muslim state of Albania.
So, such things do happen.
But if a Turkey which dwarfs Israel in size and
population has reason to fear this, then what is
Israel to say?
One fifth of Israel is Arab
like the fifth
of Turkey which is Kurd. Yet the Jews are told by
virtually all--including Turks--that they must
allow yet another Arab state, dedicated to their
destruction, to be set up in their backyard.
Keep in mind that even the PKK doesn't seek
Turkey's destruction.
Despite the potential for problems, justice does
not demand that Kurds should remain forever
stateless in the nationalist age. Kurds lived in
the area for millennia before imperialist Turks
arrived there from Central Asia or imperialist
Arabs arrived after bursting out of the Arabian
Peninsula. Both would occupy and settle Kurdish
lands. An independent Kurdistan was promised after
World War I in Mesopotamia before it was aborted on
behalf of British petroleum politics and Arab
nationalism. If expansionist Albanians can lay
claim to Kosovo, then what are Kurds due in lands
they have lived in since biblical days?
So, what's to be done?
There is no doubt that the Kurds must do what
the Arabs refuse to do
They must show their Turkish neighbors that an
independent or highly autonomous
Iraqi federal Kurdish region will not be a
threat. They must have serious discussions with the
PKK about what the greater good for Kurdistan will
require. That means Kurdish leaders must get their
own acts together as well
beyond protecting
their own virtual fiefdoms. And, if need be, they
must use military force to subdue their own
extremists.
Hopefully, it will not come to this. And nothing
will be expected in this regard if the Turks don't
show that they will be willing to grant Kurds the
same right to have in one of which they expect
Israel to allow Arabs to have almost two dozen
of.
Notice, please, while we're on the subject, the
absence of voices in academia and
elsewhere
the same ones demanding that
22nd Arab state, knowing full well its
murderous intentions regarding Israel.
In the late '70s, the only time my tenured
professor at Ohio State University even mentioned
Kurds is when he mocked their aspirations while
telling of his travels through Turkey. Like many
others, he knew who buttered his bread and who and
who not to put under the high power lens of moral
scrutiny. This was the same guy who lionized the
Arab quest for state # 22 and Hitler's good buddy,
the Mufti of Jerusalem.
There is room for coexistence and cooperation if
both peoples can get beyond their fears. Besides
real problems with the PKK (for which Turkey shares
part of the blame), there already are real benefits
materializing for Turks in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Turkey can establish good, working ties with
Kurds who, like Turks, can also hold their own
heads up high as a free and proud people. Both have
a history of opposing Islamic extremism, though
some are to be counted amongst both
populations
more with the Turks than with the
Kurds.
Kurds from Turkey, Syria, Iran, and elsewhere
wanting to live in an independent Kurdish state can
have in Iraqi Kurdistan what Jews have in a reborn
Israel.
Like formerly truly stateless Jews, Kurds have
suffered greatly because of this statelessness.
Renaming Arabs "Palestinians" does not change the
fact that Arabs have almost two dozen
states--conquered from mostly non-Arab peoples. If
there is a rough analogy to the Jews, it is the
Kurds, not the Arabs.
Both Turks and Kurds must examine each others
needs and fears.
The future can be a promising one for both
peoples.
While Arabs of different stripes blow each other
apart, Turks and Kurds have mostly shown that they
want no part of this sort of thing.
Think of the possibilities which can arise if
both peoples can get themselves to grant each other
the humanity and respect both deserve.
The realm of the Turks will not see itself
geographically split again. The Kurds must
understand this. But this does not mean that Kurds
should be suppressed in Turkey. To insure Turkey's
integrity, the Turks have demanded Turkification of
all who live there. This needs to be moderated.
Imagine the outcry if Israel was doing this sort of
thing to its Arabs.
Ironically, Kurdish autonomy or independence in
Iraqi Kurdistan has the potential to ease these
very problems
under the right
conditions.
Having the potential to live in a Kurdish-ruled
area will give Kurds everywhere less grievance and
reason to resort to violence.
Will there be risks and problems?
Of course. There is much that will be needed to
be worked out. And all thirty million Kurds will
not fit into Iraqi Kurdistan.
But reasonable people can come up with
reasonable solutions.
My advice to my Turkish friends
Invade Iraqi Kurdistan?
Don't do it!
There is a better way
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|