|
Agust
13, 2007
Realism,
Not Pessimism, And Certainly No Room For
Optimism
by Gerald A. Honigman
Shocking
Yet another State Department Arabist takes Jews
to task for wanting to survive the Foggy Folks'
less than friendly--if not downright
hostile--"peace" (of the grave) plans. We'll return
to this later
First, imagine, for one moment, that the entire
territory of the United States was reduced to the
size of New Jersey.
Rather than being separated from any real or
potential enemies by thousands of miles of oceans
as it formerly was, this new, constricted America
is still surrounded by the rest of the same
territory that was the old America
but that
land now consists of enemies dedicated to
mini-America's destruction.
Next, picture that the animosity of the enemies
America faces has nothing to do with its size --for
America is now indeed tiny--but is based on their
belief that Americans have no historical or
political right whatsoever to the land. Our
enemies, instead, claim all of the area--including
America--as purely their own patrimony.
Next, picture that mini-America with 6 million
Americans, surrounded by hundreds of millions of
enemies who would like to have it for dinner, has a
powerful, friendly nation across the sea from which
it gets most of its support--militarily,
financially, and so forth.
The problem is that America's friend also has
deep connections to America's far more numerous and
wealthy enemies. The friend wishes that America
would be more "pliable" so that it could further
its standing with them for many reasons--not the
least being the enormous amount of money being made
by government employees, courtesy of those above
deep connections, as they move through the
revolving doors of government and business. There
are, of course, strategic and other reasons as
well.
The dilemma here is that just supporting a
viable, independent America is enough to make
America's enemies its powerful friend's enemies as
well.
Okay
Welcome back to reality. The above, of
course, is the relationship between Israel and
America reversed.
On August 10th, an Israeli newspaper quoted
former Prime Minister, now Defense Minister,
General Ehud Barak, as saying that Israel would not
withdraw from the West Bank before finding a
solution to Palestinian Arab rocket attacks, "which
will take between three to five years."
Commenting on others' wishful thinking about a
"quick peace," Barak then added, "the Israel public
reacts sanely in not believing such fantasies ...
for it is not possible to envisage a separation
with the Palestinians before finding the means to
protect the population against shootings" from
rockets or missiles.
Consider, please, that after Israel totally
withdrew from Gaza--while it was still under the
"moderate" Abbas' control--towns in southern Israel
proper were hit non-stop by Arab rockets, mortars,
and so forth.
Consider also that the Arab intifada was
launched under Fatah's watch--not Hamas'--and the
Arafatians did nothing to stop the blown buses,
teen nightclubs, restaurants, and other barbarism
deliberately targeting the most innocent.
Not only did they not stop it, but they were often
a party to the atrocities themselves.
Next, think about this
When it comes to the subject of a Jewish
Israel, there is no disagreement between Fatah and
Hamas on this subject--despite the whitewashing and
cover-ups that the State Department has been doing
in Arafat's and his successors' names for decades
now.
So, Israel is faced with a Hamas openly calling
for its destruction and Abbas' Fatah Arafatians
adhering to their destruction in phases and
Trojan Horse strategies for Israel's
elimination.
Abbas has never changed the platform he ran on
for Israel's destruction (but by "more acceptable"
means), and the schools, mosques, camps, television
stations, newspapers, maps, websites, and so forth
look no different than Hamas' when it comes to the
acceptance of a Jewish State as a permanent
neighbor. On the contrary, Israel's disappearance
or non-existence is the perpetual message in all of
Fatah's outlets.
After Abbas' Fatah got the boot from Gaza
recently, it then had to start the sweet talk up
once again to gain additional American support.
Since it doesn't take much to get the Foggy
Folks to squeeze the Jews ( they opposed Israel's
rebirth in the first place and have often been
nasty to its mere basic interests ever since), the
full court press was indeed short in the coming,
with a weak-kneed Israeli leadership bearing the
brunt. And this time, Israel's alleged "best
friend," President George W. Bush, was leading the
charge. With a long term good prognosis for Iraq
not likely, Dubya would like a success he could
point to in the region as he leaves office. The
birth of Arab state # 22--and second, not
first, Arab state in " Palestine" (Jordan sitting
on about 80% of the original 1920 Mandate)--would
do nicely
for many reasons.
Enter Ehud Barak
Ironically, this is the same guy whom President
Bill Clinton--aiming to redeem his own
presidency--squeezed at Camp David and Taba not
long ago to give away the store. Luckily, Arafat
refused.
But, here we are again a bit later--yet with
virtually the same scenario.
Abbas has so far proven to be nothing more than
Arafat in a suit. He too "condemns"--wink,
wink--blowing Jews apart while funding those
who do so and having his own Fatah folks take part.
He plays the good cop/bad cop game well with State
Department assistance.
And for such "moderation"--he still refuses to
give up on his demand to overwhelm Israel with
millions of alleged "returning" jihadist refugees,
talks only of a hudna /cease fire, refuses
to confront Arabs who terrorize Jews, and so
forth-- Prime Minister Olmert (the other Ehud)
& Co. have turned over arms and military
equipment, released terrorists, given up territory,
provided funds, further exposed Jews to Arab
terror, etc., etc., etc.
When Barak commented that Israel should not be
rushed to a virtual retreat to its miniscule1949
armistice lines existence before it developed
better means to deal with attacks that will likely
be launched from new territory scheduled to be
turned over to Abbas, he was simply stating the
facts that the most naïve of the naïve
could understand.
What Defense Minister anywhere faced with
such realities Barak is confronted with would plan
differently?
Would America be so trusting of an enemy with
such a proven deadly, rejectionist record?
Well, after Barak responded as we've read above,
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (she already
has an oil tanker named for her
all hail
the petrobuck!
just ask, among many
others, former Secretary of State James Baker) had
her man at Foggy Bottom do the typical Arabist
dirty work.
Tom Casey issued an insulting diplomatic slap
calling Barak's comments "overly pessimistic." Can
you ever recall a Foggy spokesperson issuing such a
slap to one of the feudal Arab oil despots--even
after 9/11 and all of those Saudi homicide
bombers?
Not good for business
if ya know what I
mean. Again, many a Foggy Folk and other government
official has eventually benefited from the Arab oil
spigot
including the Bush family.
Finally, read General Barak's comments
again.
Where's the pessimism? He is a seasoned Israeli
military leader who knows his enemies far better
than any Foggy Arabist does.
Would Casey allow Dulles Airport, the White
House, Pentagon, and such to come within range of
rocket fire from an enemy dedicated to our
destruction and which has constantly launched
missiles at us in the past--even after extensive
unilateral concessions were made to them? How
about, perhaps, Casey's own kids--would he bare
their necks so optimistically given the nature of
the enemy Israel faces?
What evidence does Casey provide that the Fatah
leopard will change its murderous spots? We've
heard the empty sweet Arafatian tune before. Excuse
after excuse after excuse has been made for
them.
Meanwhile, Abbas' boys have been reported to be
currently renegotiating deals with Hamas and paying
Hamasniks with money recently released to Abbas by
Olmert under Washington's pressure. What evidence
does Casey have of a Fatahstan which will fully
recognize a Jewish Israel and finally change its
charter which calls for Israel's destruction? Or a
Fatahstan which will ever teach acceptance instead
of the joys of martyrdom to its children?
None. None at all
But the Jews, in a nation the size of New
Jersey, will continue to be squeezed anyway, and
this time it won't be just places like Sderot in
the Israeli Negev under fire, but Jerusalem, Tel
Aviv, and most of Israel's population and industry
which are located in Israel's narrow 9-16 mile wide
waist that will be under attack.
Realism, Mr. Casey
not
pessimism.
And certainly not optimism. Yet, only if the
latter was truly available, would the core
concessions Israel is being forced to make make any
sense.
As many of us have written, this whole thing has
the stench of Munich 1938 about it, with
Chamberlain's sellout of the Czechs to Hitler to
supposedly achieve peace for our time.
Unfortunately, none of this matters right now
with the folks running the show in Washington.
So, what will it take to wake the Israeli public
up from its dangerous slumber?
A great Hebrew sage, Rabbi Hillel, proclaimed a
few thousand years ago, "if I am not for myself,
who will be? If I am only for myself, what am I?
And if not now, when?"
Israel has bent over backwards to make critical
concessions to those who still seek its destruction
anyway.
It's time for the first part of Hillel's message
to at last be taken seriously.
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|