|
September
6, 2007
Imagine For
One Moment
by Gerald A. Honigman
that
instead of Iranian artillery indiscriminately
shelling Kurdish civilians across the border in
Iraq, it was Israeli artillery doing likewise to
Arabs in Gaza.
Let's step back a bit.
For weeks now, Iran has been shelling Kurdish
villages in Iraq, supposedly because it fears that
Iranian Kurds, who wish for autonomy in Iran, are
taking refuge across the border. Iran says PEJAK--a
breakaway faction of the Kurdistan Workers' Party
(PKK)--launches attacks from Iraqi bases.
For some time now, Turks and Iranians have been
collaborating in ways to deal with their Kurdish
"headaches." In this, they're soul mates with Arabs
as well. All have worked to deny over thirty
million Kurds--who pre-date Arabs and Turks in the
region by millennia and who are there at least as
long as Iranians--political rights in a nationalist
age.
And it's worse than that. All three have killed
many hundreds of thousands of Kurds, subjugated
living ones, and denied them even their own culture
and language over the past century.
While the world demands a 22nd state for Arabs
(their second, not first, one in
"Palestine"
Arab Jordan sits on 80% of the
latter), Kurds are still only referred to as
separatists, terrorists, or the like when
this subject comes up for them. The AP story on
September 2nd was the latest to do this ("Iranian
Shelling Angers Iraq," by Yahya Barzanji). And
consider the following as well. There are millions
of Arabs in Iran's own western, oil-rich Khuzestan
province--so many that even Iranians have called it
Arabistan for centuries. It was the main
reason Iraq and Iran fought their bloody war
several decades ago. Why not create Arab state #22
there--especially since the province did trade back
and forth between Arab and Iranian rule over the
centuries?
Answer
Won't happen because the Iranians
are total hypocrites.
Iran brutally suppresses Arab, Kurd, Baluchi,
Azeri, and so forth when it comes to the question
of Iran's own unity and national security, yet it's
quick to point the finger at Israel about the
latter's reluctance to cave in to Hamas, Fatah, and
other Arabs who still have the Jew of the
Nations' destruction as their end goal.
So, let's return to the beginning of this
article.
Over two years after Israel totally withdrew
from Gaza, Israel's south is still being bombarded
indiscriminately by Arab rockets and so forth from
Gaza. One of the latest hit near a day care center,
damaging a home next door and sending 12 young
children to the hospital. Another exploded on a
street in the center of the city. In their
statements to the press, the Arabs called the
attacks a "gift" for the new school year.
Could you imagine the world-wide outcry,
condemnations, editorials, and so forth if--in
response to this barbaric, deliberate assaults on
the most innocent--Israel merely repaid Arabs in
kind?
Folks, if I was running the show, best believe
they'd get a mega dose of their own medicine--and
with just a slight bit of hesitation. I'd probably
first issue sufficient warnings that such equal
treatment will soon be coming
and then
exponentially with each new Arab "revenge"
attack.
Sorry, lefty, suicidal, liberals (and I'm an
old fashioned Liberal, in many ways,
myself
but a very different breed from the
"new" species)--especially the head-in-the-sand
Hebrew types.
Let Arabs see what it's like when they're
subjected to random, indiscriminate bombardment
like they dish out
perhaps afterwards they'll
think twice about allowing the deliberate murder
and attempted murder of Jews from being launched
from their lands. And, if not, the other way didn't
work either. When you're outnumbered 300 million
Arabs to 5 million Israeli Jews, perceived weakness
and inaction is suicidal. Tit-for-tat responses
don't work under these circumstances.
Yeh, I know, the world would be screaming about
"Nazi Jews" and such
the same world that
watches Israel's Sderot daily targeted and
victimized and says nothing.
Whoops--sorry, I'm wrong
the world
does say that Israel must cave in even
more.
So, being "nice" hasn't worked. Again,
unilateral withdrawals and such are simply seen by
Arabs as weakness and incremental victories towards
their destruction-in-phases plans for
Israel.
Jews try to do it right and get shafted
anyway.
Israel tries its best to target the exact
perpetrators--yet when the latter hide amidst their
own populations (against the Geneva Conventions),
civilians at times get caught in the
middle
especially since Arabs love to use
their own kids to retrieve rocket launchers after
firing missiles at Israel. Sick
but again, no
world outcry.
Now, given this situation regarding expectations
of Israel to pinpoint targets as it responds
to Arab terror, why is it that Iran feels free to
attack Kurdish civilians at will because of its
quarrel with Kurdish "separatists?"
Why is there no worldwide outcry for the plight
of Kurdish victims and refugees--let alone the
absence of support for Kurdish political
aspirations? Where are editorials, nasty sermons
and demands from the American State Department, and
such?
While I'm not endorsing PKK or PEJAK attacks on
innocents if and when they occur, please understand
that neither Arabs, Turks, nor Iranians have
granted Kurds anywhere near the rights that Israel
has already conceded to Arabs which seek its very
destruction
including partitions of the land
itself. Why is the latter a must for Israel, but
autonomy (at the least) and political rights for
suppressed Kurds unspeakable?
Shortly, Mr. Bush's Fall Summit to shove
a Fatahstan--the Arabs' second state in
Palestine--down Israel's throat will
commence--despite the fact that Abbas's allegedly
"moderate" Arafatians have as much or more Jewish
blood on their hands--and the same end goals
regarding Jews--as Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Just
visit all of their websites, for starters.
Is it not time for the plight of tens of
millions of Kurds--who seek no one else's
destruction, but just a slice of political rights
themselves which has been denied them up until
now--to also move onto the front burner of the
world's moral conscience?
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|