|
October
21, 2007
Hadrian's
Successors
by Gerald A. Honigman
"Titus
was appointed by his father to complete the
subjugation of Judaea... he commanded three legions
in Judaea itself... To these he added the twelfth
from Syria and the third and twenty-second from
Alexandria... amongst his allies were a band of
Arabs, formidable in themselves and harboring
towards the Jews the bitter animosity usually
subsisting between neighboring nations..." Vol.
II, Book V, The Works of Tacitus
President Bush and Secretary of State Rice are
determined to cram yet another Arab state (#22, and
second, not first, in "Palestine"
Jordan
carved out of some 80% of the original 1920
Mandate) dedicated--either sooner or later--to
Israel's destruction down the latter's throat.
Leaving office in the foreseeable future, and with
the Iraq mess not looking less messier in the long
term, they'd like this legacy to call their
own.
Notice I said nothing about peace as being part
of that actual Middle East legacy. Devout
Christians, I guess that's like the concept of a
Heavenly Jerusalem as opposed to political
reality.
No matter what they say, on the record, about
wanting a two-state solution, Dubya and Condi know
full well that that's not what their so-called
"moderate" Arab buddies have in mind for the long
term. And forget about the at least more honest
Hamas & Co.
Both have access to all that Abbas and his
fellow Fatah Arafatians have been saying to their
own people in Arabic, preaching in their mosques,
posting on their official maps and websites,
teaching to their kids, etc. and so forth. "Peace"
with the Jews is most certainly no where to be
found.
As many of us have written for years now, the
current push by Israel's "best friends" simply
falls right into the Arabs' own post-'67 game
plan.
Having pushed onto the back burner the blueprint
for Israel's destruction in one fell swoop after it
backfired in the Six Day War, the new Arab strategy
called for a destruction in stages. Israel was
first "diplomatically" to be pressured into
returning to its microscopic (in some places 9-mile
wide), indefensible, '49 armistice line--not
border--existence. Afterwards, the combination of
massive Arab armaments and manpower in the
surrounding states would be allied with the newest
Arab state, set up in Israel's backyard, to undo
Israel's 1948 rebirth on some 11% of the total area
of the 1920 Mandate of Palestine.
Since the Oslo Peace (of the grave) process, the
Arabs have watched this destruction in stages
process unfold nicely. And now, an American
president, who has seen his ratings nosedive, has
agreed to the wishes of a State Department who
fought President Truman over the very rebirth of
Israel in the first place and has often been
hostile ever since. Keep in mind that many of these
folks--including America's current two top
players--have had impressive and lucrative Arab
petrodollar connections
especially after they
leave office.
Who doesn't want peace? I guess it matters how
that word is defined.
But a look at what Israel got from Gaza after a
total withdrawal--thousands of mortar and rocket
attacks, death, destruction, and so forth launched
by Arabs now simply that much closer to Israel
proper-- tells us what's in store for Tel Aviv,
Haifa, Jerusalem, and so forth after Abbas gets all
of Judea and Samaria--aka the "West Bank."
As every excuse under the sun was made for Abbas
for not stopping Arab attacks on Israel when he was
solely in charge of the show (as the great
puppeteer, the Egyptian ghoul, Arafat's,
successor), expect likewise from "Palestine" after
Bush and Condi twist Israel's arms into not
spoiling their full throttle "peace" initiative by
refusing suicide.
Keep in mind, an America that repeatedly goes to
war thousands of miles away from home in the name
of its own national security (and why did we really
topple Noriega in Panama?) is now demanding that
Israel relinquish any minute semblance of this
itself and place its faith totally in the hands of
those who now see their destruction in stages plans
coming into fruition.
Additionally, Dubya and Condi's darling, Abbas,
insists that after Israel's withdrawal to the '49
armistice lines, it must then also agree to be
flooded by jihadist alleged Arab refugees. The one
half of Israel's Jews who were refugees from "Arab"
lands due to the same war Arabs launched to nip
Israel in the bud in '48 are of no concern.
Now, please turn the clock back two millennia
and look at the opening quote above from one of the
Roman Empire's key historians.
Notice, please, some things change and others
never do.
After the 1st Revolt in 66-73 C.E. (see also the
contemporary accounts of the Roman-sponsored Jewish
historian, Josephus, in his extensive Antiquities
of the Jews and Wars of the Jews), Rome issued
thousands of Judaea Capta coins which can be seen
today in museums all over the world. Notice,
please, Judaea Capta...not "Palaestina Capta."
Additionally, to celebrate this victory, the Arch
of Titus was erected and stands tall in Rome to
this very day.
When, some sixty years later, Emperor Hadrian
decided to further desecrate the site of the
destroyed Temple of the Jews by erecting a pagan
structure there, it was the grandchildren's turn to
take on their mighty conquerors.
The result of the struggle of this tiny nation
for its freedom was, perhaps, as predictable as
that which would have occurred had Lithuania taken
on the Soviet Union during its heyday of power.
Listen next to this quote from Dio Cassius:
- 580,000 men were slain, nearly the whole of
Judaea made desolate. Many Romans, moreover,
perished in this war (the Bar Kochba Revolt).
Therefore Hadrian in writing to the senate did
not employ the opening phrase commonly affected
by the emperors, ' I and the legions are in
health.'
Hadrian was so enraged at the Jews' struggle for
freedom in their own land that, in the words of the
esteemed modern historian, Bernard Lewis, "Hadrian
made a determined attempt to stamp out the embers
not only of the revolt but also of Jewish
nationhood and statehood... obliterating its Jewish
identity."
Wishing to end, once and for all, Jewish hopes,
Hadrian renamed the land itself from Judaea to
"Syria Palaestina" -- Palestine -- after the Jews'
historic enemies, the Philistines, a non-Semitic
sea people from the eastern Mediterranean or Aegean
area. Up until that time the name was used by
Greeks and Romans simply to designate a region, not
a kingdom, nation, or such.
All of this did not occur until after 135 C.E.,
with the defeat of Judaea's charismatic leader,
Shimon Bar Kochba. And, as with the breathtaking
discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls practically at
the moment of Israel's rebirth almost six decades
ago by an Arab shepherd boy, Bar Kochba's letters
to his troops, his minted coins "For the Freedom of
Israel," and other archaeological treasures were
also soon unearthed.
Dubya and Condi's projected Palestine--which,
like Hadrian's, intends to replace Israel--not live
along side it--became largely "Arab" the same way
that most of the twenty-one states that already
call themselves "Arab" today did... by the
conquest, occupation, settlement, and forced
Arabization of other native, non-Arab peoples and
their lands... Berbers, Copts, Black Africans,
Jews, Kurds, and so forth.
Muhammad and his Arab successors' imperial
caliphal armies burst out of the Arabian Peninsula
in the 7th century C.E. and spread the Dar ul-Islam
in all directions.
The Ottoman Turks were the latest in a long
series of imperialist conquerors to rule the land
since the Jews fought for their independence
against Rome. No one ever had an independent
kingdom or nation there since the fall of Judaea.
The Ottomans ruled for some four centuries up until
after World War I. From the 10th century onwards,
the Arabs lost control of the land themselves. And
when the Arabs' own imperial empires ruled, it was
from Damascus or Baghdad. There was never an
independent Arab entity of Palestine.
During the Mandatory period following the break
up of empires after World War I, the League of
Nations Permanent Mandates commission recorded
scores of thousands of Arabs pouring into a largely
depopulated Palestine from surrounding countries to
take advantage of the economic development going on
because of the Jews. Many more entered under cover
of darkness and were never listed. All of these
folks were preceded in the 19th century by many
thousands of Egyptians who came with Muhammad Ali
and son Ibrahim pasha's invading armies and never
left... more Arab settlers in Palestine. Arafat
himself was one of them. So was Hamas' "patron
saint," Izzadin al-Qassam... coming from Latakia,
Syria.
Back to the current reality, I believe it was
the late Israeli Prime Minister, Golda Meir, who
perhaps said it best. I'll try to paraphrase
it
It's not what Gentiles think but what the Jews
will do that in the end counts.
While this may sound quite naïve coming
from a people whose population accounts for so
small a portion of the world's population, think
about what the opposite has achieved throughout
most of the past millennia.
As I wrote many months ago, the party Dubya and
Condi have in store for Israel should be one Israel
declines to attend until Israel gets itself leaders
who will not simply be yes men for those who do not
have their nation's best interests in mind.
While the latter is not the job of an American
president or secretary of state (as Lord Palmerston
said, nations don't have permanent friends, just
interests), it is the most important job of the
leadership of Israel.
And, unlike a three-thousand mile-wide America,
Israel doesn't have two vast oceans separating it
from those who wish it ill.
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|