|
March
2, 2008
My Friends,
Dare To Think About What The Future Could
Be
by Gerald A. Honigman
I've
watched the recent Turkish invasion of Iraqi
Kurdistan closely.
I have not commented until now because I have
written extensively about what's needed
previously.
What I will now say I've largely said before,
but it's now time to reassert what I believe to be
hard truths to two friends.
I cannot condemn Ankara's decision to invade
Iraqi Kurdistan anymore than I could condemn
Israel's decision to go after Arabs who target Jews
from Gaza, Judea and Samaria (renamed only recently
in history the "West Bank"), and so forth. I'm glad
to see that, for whatever reasons, the Turks have
now withdrawn.
The PKK's refuge in Iraqi Kurdistan was an open
invitation for a Turkish invasion. I'm surprised it
took so long in the coming. And I wrote that in the
Kurdish media itself long ago.
Having said this, there's another hard series of
truths
Unlike the plight of one fifth of Turkey's
population who are Kurds, Israel's Arab population
(also one fifth of Israel) are the freest Arabs
anywhere in the Middle East. Despite many of the
latter composing a real fifth column (siding with
fellow Arabs who call for Israel's total
destruction), Arab language, culture, political
rights, and so forth flourish in the land of the
Jews.
Perfection? No
but compared to the plight
of non-Arabs in so-called "Arab " lands--especially
those whom the Arabs call "their" kilab
yahud (Jew dogs), the Jews who are left (more
Jews fled those lands to Israel than Arabs who fled
Israel)--Israeli Arabs live in Paradise. Just ask
black African Sudanese in Darfur and southern
Sudan, for starters (and Copts, Kurds, Assyrians,
Amazigh/Berbers, and so forth).
I was pleased to hear that the Kurdish Workers
Party (PKK) recently invited Turkey to hold talks
to resolve differences, while the President of
Iraq's Kurdistan Region, Masud Barzani, expressed
readiness to contribute to finding a peaceful
solution to the problem. This is not the first time
they've extended these invitations either.
In a statement, the PKK expressed a readiness to
seek a peaceful solution to the issue of Kurds in
Turkey through mediation by the government of
Iraq's Kurdish Region and supported the KRG's call
for establishing dialogue.
On his part, President Barzani expressed his
readiness to "actively participate" in finding a
peaceful solution to the PKK-Turkish problem, which
he hoped would "end violence in the region and
build better relations of cooperation and
consolidate security and stability for our
people."
On the surface, this might appear to just be
just wishful thinking. But U.S. Secretary of
Defense Robert Gates's statement openly addressing
the need for Ankara to address the real grievances
of Turkish Kurds seems to be a welcome new
development. I don't recall an American official
vocalizing this as firmly prior to now.
Let's step back again
Over the past century in particular, after the
collapse of the Ottoman Turkish Empire in the wake
of World War I, the Kurds were renamed Mountain
Turks, had their language and culture outlawed,
etc. and so forth to insure that the new,
constricted Turkey which arose with Mustafa
Kemal--Ataturk--would suffer no further
geographical losses. Understandable, but not a just
solution to the problem. After all, long before a
Turk or Arab was in that vicinity, Kurds long lived
there.
Turkey has been a valuable ally of America and
has resisted Islamic extremism better than any
other Muslim country. It also has relatively good
relations with Israel
especially when its
relations with neighboring Syria take a dive.
So, as with my Kurdish friends, I truly wish
nothing but good for our Turkish friends as
well.
But, as I've written often before and will
repeat until it sinks in, friends should be able to
disagree and still remain friends.
When Israel goes after Hamas terror masters,
Ankara is quick to criticize and lecture about the
need to create the Arabs' 22nd state and second,
not first, one in "Palestine"--Jordan having
surfaced on some 80% of the original April 25, 1920
territory over the past century. Turkey knows full
well what the Arabs' plans are for the Jewish
State, yet makes these demands anyway. But talk
about the need for justice for 35 million truly
stateless Kurds, and Ankara goes ballistic.
Turkey is some forty times as large as Israel
geographically and eleven times larger in
population.
Despite this, Ankara sees nothing wrong, after
demanding the creation of the Arabs' 22nd state,
with telling Kurds--who have been massacred and
subjugated in all the lands where they have lived
in the new nationalist era--that they must remain
forever in that stateless condition because of the
potential threat independence in Iraqi Kurdistan
might have to Turkey. The Turks fear the effect
this will have on their own large, adjacent--and
suppressed-- Kurdish population.
As we all know, the fear is well founded, and I
understand it.
But if a Turkey which dwarfs Israel in size and
population has reason to fear this, then what is
Israel to say?
Again, one fifth of Israel is Arab
like the
fifth of Turkey which is Kurd. Yet the Jews are
told by virtually all--including Turks--that they
must allow yet another Arab state, dedicated to
their very destruction, to be set up in their
backyard.
Keep in mind that whatever its flaws may be, the
PKK does not seek Turkey's destruction. The calls
for independence by some largely are sired by real,
unaddressed grievances--as Secretary Gates
acknowledged.
Despite the potential for problems, justice does
not demand that Kurds remain forever politically
powerless in the nationalist age. A miniscule
Israel faces worse problems regarding such things
but is expected to allow for the creation of yet
another rejectionist Arab state.
So, what's to be done?
Once again repeating what I've written earlier,
there is no doubt that the Kurds must do what the
Arabs refuse to do
Iraqi Kurdistan must show Ankara that an
independent or highly autonomous Iraqi federal
Kurdish region will not be a threat. Had it done so
earlier, a Turkish invasion--even with Ankara eying
Kurdish oil--would not have occurred or at least
wouldn't have been justified.
As President Barzani (whose late father will
forever be a hero of mine) has stated above, there
must be serious discussions with the PKK about what
the greater good for Kurdistan will require. This
means Kurdish leaders must get their own acts
together as well
beyond protecting their own
virtual fiefdoms--be they Talabani, Barzani, or
whomever. If need be, they must use military force
to subdue their own extremists.
Hopefully, it will not come to this. And nothing
will be expected in this regard if the Turks don't
show that they will be willing to grant Iraqi Kurds
the same right to have in one of which they expect
Israel to allow Arabs to have almost two dozen of.
Ankara must also seriously address the rights of
Turkish Kurds as well instead of collaborating with
both Syria and Iran in suppression of their
respective Kurdish populations.
There is room for coexistence and cooperation if
both peoples can get beyond their fears. A brighter
future awaits them. Besides problems with the PKK,
there are already real benefits materializing for
Turks in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Both have a history of opposing Islamic
extremism, though some are to be counted amongst
both populations.
Kurds from Turkey, Syria, Iran, and elsewhere
wanting to live in an independent Kurdish state can
have in Iraqi Kurdistan what Jews have in a reborn
Israel.
Like formerly truly stateless Jews, Kurds have
suffered greatly because of this political
powerlessness.
Again, renaming Arabs "Palestinians" (most of
whom came from elsewhere) does not change the fact
that Arabs have almost two dozen states--conquered
from mostly non-Arab peoples. If there is a rough
analogy to the Jews, it is the Kurds, not the
Arabs. The Turks especially must also understand
this since, besides Turkey, there are also a half
dozen other Turkish states.
Both Turks and Kurds must examine each others
needs and fears.
The future can be a promising one for both
peoples.
While Arabs of different stripes blow each other
apart, Turks and Kurds have mostly shown that they
want no part of this sort of thing. Positive
nationalism is better than negative
nationalism.
Think of the possibilities which can arise if
both peoples can get themselves to grant each other
the humanity and respect both deserve.
Turkish Kurds must understand that the realm of
the Turks will not see itself geographically split
again. But this does not mean that Kurds should
continue to be suppressed in Turkey. To insure
Turkey's integrity, the Turks have demanded
Turkification of all who live there. This needs to
be changed drastically. Imagine the outcry if
Israel was doing this sort of thing to Arabs.
Ironically, Kurdish autonomy or independence in
Iraqi Kurdistan has the potential to ease these
very problems
under the right conditions.
Having the potential to live in a Kurdish-ruled
area will give Kurds everywhere less grievance and
reason to resort to violence.
Will there be risks and problems?
Of course. There is much that will be needed to
be worked out. And all thirty or forty million
Kurds will not fit into Iraqi Kurdistan.
But reasonable people can come up with
reasonable solutions.
It's time for both peoples to look ahead for a
better future for both of their
children
something Arabs who use their kids as
human shields and who send them on suicide missions
in pursuit of their own one-sided version of
justice have proven incapable of doing.
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|