|
August
7, 2008
Of Kurds And
Arabs
Beyond
Ignorance
The Allegedly Free
Press
by Gerald A. Honigman
If
it was just another State Department travesty, I
could accept it.
After all, I'm used to the Foggy Folks
doing such things as fighting President Truman over
his supporting Israel's very rebirth; concocting
latter day Arafatian Fatah "good cops" to force
down Israel's throat (knowing that on the issue of
a permanent Jewish Israel, Abbas's boys totally
agree with the Hamas "bad cops"); demanding that
Israel itself supply weapons to Fatah--which has as
much, if not more, Jewish blood on its hands than
Hamas--only to see such things as yeshiva students
later massacred as a result; setting up equivalency
standards whereby murderer and those in pursuit are
placed on the same moral plane; and so forth.
The Arabists who wield too much say at Foggy
Bottom have played such games for well over a half
century now.
Demanding a second, not first, state for
Arabs within the original 1920 borders of the
Mandate of Palestine (Jordan, sitting on the lion's
share of the land, carved out in 1922), the State
Department has no problem pressuring Israel to make
one suicidal concession after another so that Arab
state # 22 may arise.
One of the latest issues involved Arab students
("Gaza Fulbright Scholars") Secretary Rice wanted
Israel to allow to come to America to study.
Reports stated she was fuming over Israel's
reluctance to grant this request for these
particular students.
Guess what
? Turns out State has now also
"seen the light" on this matter (connections to
terror groups, etc.). Don't expect any apologies,
however.
What's worse, in all the decades I've closely
followed the Middle East, I can't recall any Foggy
Folk "fuming" over anything Arabs did--be it
blowing up Jewish teens in nightclubs, students on
buses, mothers and babies in pizzerias, gassing and
massacring Kurds, Assyrians, Copts, black Africans
in the Sudan, or Berbers in the rest of North
Africa, and so forth. Nonetheless, Baker, Rice,
Dulles, etc. fume/fumed a lot over Jews,
however.
No doubt, America needed oil, and--like many
other nations--did what it could to make nice to
those who would one day be controlling the spigots.
Many of the latter are Arabs. Not to mention that
long before former Secretaries of State James Baker
made $$$ millions and Condoleezza Rice had a
Chevron oil tanker named for her, other Foggy
Folks, under cover of the flag, also prospered via
that oil spigot.
So, that brings me to the real problem of this
current article
the press.
As with the Foggy Folks, I'm sure there are
bright people in the print and other media. So, the
problem cannot simply be due to
ignorance
which makes it much worse.
Furthermore, far too few of us have written of
this problem--as glaring as it is--and far too many
academics have shamed themselves by indulging in
such hypocrisy as well.
The problem I'm speaking of is the double
standards the press constantly uses when covering
the Arabs' quest for state # 22 versus the plight
of some thirty-five million stateless Kurds.
A free press is one of the cornerstones of a
true democracy
yet ours routinely acts like it
takes its cue from the State Department when it
comes to the Middle East. State has the same animus
and set of Arab-colored glasses when it comes to
Kurds as it has with Hebrews. As just one of
numerous examples, when--as National Security
Advisor--Dr. Rice spoke at the U.S. Institute of
Peace on August 19, 2004, here's some of what she
said about the birth of Arab state # 22:
The President believes that the Palestinian
people (Arabs) deserve not merely their own state,
but a just and democratic state that serves their
interests and fulfills their decent
aspiration.
She later went on to say something to the effect
that there would be no greater cause than the birth
of Palestine.
Now contrast this with how, on this same
occasion, she simply brushed off a question
regarding a Kurdish referendum on independence
(which showed that at least 80% of Kurds wanted
this) with the following disdain:
It's the role of leadership to convince
people that they really ought to stay in the same
body.
Sucking the Arab oil teat quite well since
leaving office, James Baker led the Baker-Hamilton
Commission (Iraq Study Group) for President Bush
not long ago and proposed similar shaft the Kurds
ideas. The list, unfortunately, goes on and on.
We're supposed to expect better of our press,
but it has mostly behaved as if the Foggy Folks are
its mentors.
Countless editorials and op-eds have been
written on behalf of the birth of Arab state #
22--knowing full well that Arabs of either stripe
have no intention of living peacefully with a
Jewish neighbor--regardless of its size. A visit to
either good or bad cops' maps, textbooks, websites,
and so forth soon reveals this.
Yet I still have not seen the press editorial
calling for the birth of Kurdish State # 1...or
even for meaningful Kurdish autonomy. The same
papers who call Arabs who blow up buses "militants"
have no problem calling the PKK in Turkey
"terrorists." Why the double standards? Where's the
courage of a free press to confront such
injustice?
Are there problems associated with addressing
the aspirations of tens of millions of repeatedly
used and abused native, stateless Kurds?
Sure, but no more--indeed less--than with
those associated with the creation of Arab state #
22.
I have written of this many times before, such
as in State Department Math... http://www.krg.org/articles/detail.asp?rnr=77&lngnr=12&anr=6589&smap=.
Keep in mind that Kurds were indeed promised such a
state in the north of Mesopotamia after World War I
but were shafted by
guess what?
British petroleum politics and Arab
nationalism.
A united, Arab-controlled Iraq was created
instead in all of the former Mandate of
Mesopotamia.
Among other places, you can find my work on this
(while a doctoral student) on Paris's acclaimed
Institut d'Etudes Politique (Science Po)
recommended reference list:
http://bibliotheque.sciences-po.fr/produits/bibliographies/question_kurde.htm
Keep in mind that all the Kurds are asking for
is meaningful autonomy within a federated Iraq--far
less than what they truly deserve. But to have the
former, they must secure their finances as well.
And that brings me to the press again
Recently, just days apart, my local paper
carried photos and articles supplied by the
Associated Press (July 29th and August 3rd).
One showed a "Palestinian" (Arab) boy with "The
Dome Of The Rock Mosque" in the background.
The overwhelmingly vast majority of the time,
what's missing from such reporting to mostly
unaware readers is that that mosque was
deliberately built--after the Arabs' own imperial
conquest of Israel in the 7th century C.E.--on the
Temple Mount of the Jews. Using this case as an
example, the most you'll read is that the place is
holy to three faiths and such.
The second piece, by the AP's Robert Reid, was
entitled, "Kurdish Demands Over Kirkuk Spur
Protest."
The Kirkuk and Mosul region is where the second
half of Iraq's major oil deposits are located.
After the Brits got a favorable decision on the
Mosul Question from the League of Nations in 1925,
the abortion of promises of independence to the
Kurds became complete.
Now, if Israel captured Arab oil fields,
Judaized the area, and so forth, the whole world
would have a hissy fit. Actually, it did develop
the Abu Rodeis oil fields in the Sinai, captured as
a result of the '67 War started when Egypt
blockaded Israel at the Straits of Tiran.
Subsequently, in return for a very cold peace (the
arms and explosives coming into Gaza to kill Jews
are entering largely via Egypt), Israel gave up its
chance at energy independence by returning the
whole shebang to Egypt.
Now, apply this to Iraq.
Why is it okay for Arabs and Iranians to control
'their' oil, but not so for Kurds?
And please don't respond--as that second article
did--that Kirkuk is composed of mixed nationalities
(largely due to Saddam's forced Arabization of the
area).
Kirkuk is as Kurdish as Londonistan--er, I mean
London-- is British
despite all of those other
nationalities now living there. Iran's major oil
fields are in its western province of
Khuzestan
but that area has been known as
Arabistan for centuries
Guess why?
There is no doubt that Kurds lived in the area
of the Mosul and Kirkuk oil fields for millennia
before a Turk or Arab even knew it existed. As
Hurrians, Kassites, Medes, Guti, and so forth, they
were neighbors of the Jews. As for the presence of
some Turkmen as well, recall that, besides Turkey,
there are a half dozen other Asiatic Turkic states
as well. It's the Kurds who are still lacking a
national liberation
We Americans take pride in our sense of fair
play.
We can't do much about the State Department's
shameful shenanigans--except elect strong
Presidents (as with Truman )--while making sure
that both the latter and Congress also strongly
receive our messages.
But we can demand that our press lives up to the
source of pride it should be for any free
nation--let alone America--which calls itself a
true democracy. It should not simply become
anyone's virtual mouthpiece.
Sadly, when it comes to the Middle East, reading
the news today is like reading a State Department
press release
like those we've seen above.
That's not what a free press is supposed to be
about.
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|