|
November
17, 2008
If I Forget
Thee...Buraq's Mount And President
Obama
by Gerald A. Honigman
As
an Independent, I did not vote for our new,
in-coming President.
Seeing problems with both mainstream political
party candidates and platforms, President-elect
Obama's long list of virulenty anti-Semitic and /or
anti-Zionist friends and supporters (not that
there's really a difference...one singles out Jews
for "special treatment," the other the Jew of
the Nations) nevertheless convinced me that
this could not all be merely coincidental. Then the
news of the suppressed L.A.Times video tapes broke
adding even more fuel to this fire.
Regardless, America has chosen, and only time
will tell if it was the right choice for all kinds
of reasons.
The reality, however, is that President Bush's
team is still trying to convince Israel that it has
something other than a grave-style "peace" to look
forward to with Dubya's and the State Department's
alleged latter day Arafatian Fatah "good cop"
buddies as opposed to the at least more honest
Hamas bad guys. To any truly objective observer,
the evidence against this is overwhelming...
While it keeps getting shoved onto the back
burner for fear of the intense heat that it will
generate, there is no doubt that Jerusalem will be
one of the most difficult issues to resolve in any
so-called peace process between Arab and
Jew. Senator Obama seriously flip-flopped on this
very issue earlier in his campaign, so it's time to
take a look at some blunt facts regarding this
issue, despite the risk of ruffling even some
friendly feathers.
While Christians, Muslims, and Jews all have
ties to Jerusalem, these ties are in no way
equal.
In religious Jewish sources, for instance,
Jerusalem is mentioned over 600 times. It is not
mentioned even once in the Qur'an. It is alluded to
in the latter in passages about the Hebrew Kings,
David and Solomon, and the destruction of the
Temples of the Jews. Arabs, however, including
Abbas's alleged "good cops," deny a Jewish Temple
ever existed there and call the Temple Mount
"Buraq's Mount" instead, after Muhammad's
supposedly winged horse. But a mention of Jerusalem
itself is nowhere to be found in the Muslim holy
book...interesting, since it was recorded in many
other places besides the writings of the Jews
themselves for over 1,500 years before the rise of
Islam.
Religious claims of both Christians and Muslims
to Jerusalem exist primarily because of both of
their links to the Jews.
Political claims--based upon facts on the
ground--are more complicated. Even so, throughout
over three millennia since King David conquered the
city from the Jebusites, renamed it, and gave it
its Jewish character, no other people except the
Jews has ever made Jerusalem their capital, despite
its conquest by many imperial powers, including
that of the Arab caliphal successors to Muhammad as
they burst out of the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th
century C.E. and spread in all directions. Damascus
and Baghdad were the seats of Arab imperial power,
and Mecca and Medina were the holy cities. While
not to say that Jerusalem was ignored by its Muslim
conquerors (i.e. the Umayyads built the Dome of the
Rock/Mosque of Umar deliberately on the Temple
Mount of the Jews, making it Islam's allegedly
third holiest city), it is to say that Jerusalem
was and is in no way the focus for Islam that ithas
been for Jews and Judaism.
Since David made Jerusalem his capital and it
became the site of his son Solomon's Temple, Zion
became the heart and soul of Jewish national and
religious existence. Jews from all over the early
Diaspora made their pilgrimages and sent offerings
to its Temple. "By the Rivers of Babylon we
wept..." and "If I forget thee O Jerusalem, may my
right hand forget its cunning..." were just a few
of the many Biblical expressions of the Jews for
Zion.
Such yearning persisted throughout subsequent
millennia in the Diaspora as well. "Next Year in
Jerusalem" sustained the Jew throughout countless
degradations, massacres, and humiliations
culminating in the Holocaust.
There is no Muslim parallel to these claims,
regardless of efforts to portray Palestinian Arabs
(most of whom were new arrivals in the land
themselves) as the new Jews. Jews, from a
hundred different lands, did not have almost two
dozen other states to potentially choose from and
suffered dearly for this statelessness. Most Muslim
Arabs demand sole rights over Jerusalem the same
way they demand sole rights over Tel Aviv: In their
eyes, only they have legitimate political rights
anywhere in what they consider to be "purely Arab
patrimony" and regard as part of the Dar
ul-Islam as a result of the earlier Arab
imperial conquests mentioned above.
Regardless of whatever theology one clings to,
Jesus' historical experiences in Roman-occupied
Judea and Jerusalem were those of a Jew living
under very precarious conditions. Thousands of his
countrymen had already been killed, crucified, etc.
in the subjugation/pacification process. The
contemporary Roman and Roman-sponsored historians
themselves--Tacitus, Josephus, Dio Cassius,
etc.--had much to say about all of this. Consider
just this one telling quote from Tacitus...
Vespasian succeeded to the throne...it
infuriated his resentment that the Jews were the
only nation who had not yet submitted.
These oppressive conditions led to open revolts
and guerilla warfare by the Jews to rid the land of
its mighty pagan conqueror--wars which would
eventually lead the Roman Emperor, Hadrian, to
rename the land itself from Judaea to
Syria Palaestina (Palestine) in 135 C.E. in
an attempt to stamp out any remaining hopes for
Jewish independence and national existence. Judaea
was thus renamed after the Jews' historic enemies,
the Philistines, a non-Arab, non-Semitic sea people
from the eastern Mediterranean or Aegean region, to
drive home the point.
For a modern analogy, imagine little Latvia as
it was engulfed by the Soviet Union in the latter's
heyday of power. Or a Hungarian freedom fighter or
Greek partisan taking on the Soviets or the Nazis.
Think of the sympathy and admiration normally given
to such situations...
Now contrast this with the treatment Jews
received over the ages for longing for this same
freedom and dignity. Whatever Jesus did or did not
mean in his alleged statement, "render unto
Caesar...," this passage and others in the New
Testament have been used to belittle this same
desire for freedom and independence among the
Jews.
Judaea Capta (not Palaestina
Capta) coins were issued, and the towering Arch of
Titus in Rome was erected after the first major
revolt in 70 C.E. and shows, among other things,
the Romans carrying away the giant Menorah and
other objects from the Jewish Temple that at least
many if not most Arabs and other Muslims claim
never existed. It stands in Rome to this very day
to commemorate Rome's victory over the Jews and
Jewish Jerusalem.
When Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, fled Mecca
to Medina in 622 C.E. (the Hijrah), the inhabitants
welcomed him. Medina had been developed centuries
earlier as a thriving date palm oasis by Jews
fleeing the Roman assault (the banu-Qurayzah and
banu-al-Nadir tribes, etc.), and its mixed
population of Jews and pagan Arabs had thus become
conditioned for a native prophet speaking the word
of G_d.
Muhammad learned much from the Jews. While the
actual timing of his decision on the direction of
prayer may never be known, during his long sojourn
with the Jews of Medina, his followers were
instructed to pray towards Jerusalem. Early
prominent Arab historians such as Jalaluddin came
right out and stated that this was done primarily
as an attempt to win support among the influential
Jewish tribes (the People of the Book) for
Muhammad's religio-politcal claims.
It is from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem that
Muslims believe Muhammad ascended to Heaven on his
winged horse. A mosque, the Dome of the Rock, would
later be erected on this Jewish holy site after the
Arab imperial conquest of the land in the 7th
century C.E.
There is no doubt among objective scholars that
Jews had an enormous impact on both Muhammad and
the religion that he founded. The holy sites for
Muslims in Jerusalem (i.e. the mosques erected on
the Temple Mount of the Jews) are now deemed
holy precisely because of the critical years
Muhammad spent after the Hijrah with the Jews. The
Temple Mount had no prior meaning to pagan Arabs.
While there was some early Christian influence as
well, intense scholarship has shown that the Holy
Law (Halakha) and Holy Scriptures of the Jews had a
tremendous influence on the Koran, Islamic Holy Law
(Shari'a), etc. Muhammad's Jerusalem
connection was most likely not established
until after his extended stay with his Jewish
hosts. This was no mere coincidence...Muslim
religious beliefs regarding Muhammad's
conversations with the Angel Gabriel, etc.
notwithstanding.
When the Jews refused to recognize Muhammad as
the "Seal of the Prophets," he turned on them with
a vengeance. Before long, with the exception of
Yemen, there were virtually no Jews left on the
Arabian Peninsula. And the direction of prayer was
changed away from Jerusalem and towards the Kaaba
in Mecca instead. To say that Jerusalem has the
same meaning for Muslims as it has for Jews is
simply to tell a lie.
In modern times, Jews constituted the majority
of Jerusalem's population from 1840 onwards. When
Jordanian Arabs--whose nation itself was formed
from 80% of the original mandate for Palestine
issued to Britain on April 25, 1920--seized East
Jerusalem after their invasion of reborn Israel in
1948, they destroyed dozens of synagogues and
thousands of Jewish graves, using tombstones to
pave roads, build latrines, etc.
When the Jews were denied access to their holy
sites for almost two decades, the whole world
remained silent. After Israel was forced to fight a
defensive war in 1967 due to its being blockaded by
Egypt's Nasser at the Straits of Tiran (a casus
belli) and other hostile acts, Jerusalem became
reunited. Access to all peoples and faiths
subsequently became unhindered. It was at this
moment that much of the world next chose to
rediscover Jerusalem...demanding its redivision,
internationalization, and so forth. Now there is
"justice' for you! Sickening...but, unfortunately,
not really shocking or unexpected in the Jewish
experience.
For centuries, Jews were forcibly converted
and/or expelled, massacred, humiliated, demonized,
inquisitioned, ghettoized, declared the "deicide
people," etc., to one extent or another, in both
the Muslim East (where they were known as kilab
yahud--Jew dogs) as well as the Christian West.
They are determined that their rights in the sole
capital of the sole, microscopic, reborn state that
they possess will not be sacrificed on behalf of
any would-be 22nd state (and 2nd, not
first, Arab one in "Palestine") created for
Arabs.
As President Obama gets ready to take office,
let's hope he keeps such things in mind when the
topic of the Arab-Jewish conflict in the Middle
East soon resurfaces--as it surely will.
Honigman
Archive
Gerald
A. Honigman is a Florida educator who has done
extensive doctoral studies in Middle Eastern
Affairs. He has created and conducted counter-Arab
propaganda programs for college youth, has lectured
on numerous campuses and other platforms, and has
publicly debated many Arab spokesmen. His articles
and op-eds have been published in dozens of
newspapers, magazines, academic journals and
websites all around the world. Visit his website at
http://geraldahonigman.com/.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|