|
February
21, 2005
Forget
Free Speech, Liberals Don't Tolerate Campus
Conservatives
by John T. Plecnik
Regardless
of age, we have all heard the phrase, "First
Amendment Rights," bandied about. Free speech has
been the rallying cry of the liberal elite since
the 60s, and every time violent protesters are
beaten back by police or cordoned off from a rally,
the ACLU comes a calling. However, the same team of
trial lawyers, rebel billionaires and Deaniacs turn
a blind eye toward the abuses of their academic
brethren. America's colleges and universities are
anything but free speech zones. Contrary to their
mantra of universal tolerance, Stalinist professors
and administrators see intellectual diversity as a
disease. Unpopular viewpoints, like a belief in
absolute truth or the Republican Party, are
actively discouraged.
The reality of liberal bias on campus is so
overwhelming that columnists and commentators are
forced to choose between countless illustrations.
Whether examining the anti-Christian bent at the
University of North Carolina, where one student was
labeled a sexist bigot for asserting his personal
belief that homosexuality is immoral and Alpha Iota
Omega Christian Fraternity was derecognized as a
student organization for refusing to admit
non-Christians, or the age-old liberalism of
Berkeley, where researchers found that conservatism
is a disease shared by Hitler and Ronald Reagan,
the bias is clear. Liberal professors see
conservative beliefs as vermin and our universities
as their own, private roach motels. Ideally,
conservative minds check in, but they don't check
out.
Our professors have at least four years to scare
us Democrat, and they seldom waste an opportunity.
Studies show that liberals hire liberals; the
faculty at elite institutions like Duke and Yale
fall to the Left of Hillary Clinton. More
frightening, however, is the condition of our
average campus. Along with the elites, most state
schools are stacked with Democrats and Socialists.
Perhaps conservatives are just too stupid for
academia, as Dr. Robert Brandon, chairman of Duke's
philosophy department, once asserted. Myself, I
tend to believe that hiring committees prefer
"fellow travelers." And as for self-selection, I
think most Right-wingers are smart enough to see
the "CONSERVATIVES NEED NOT APPLY" sign hanging
beneath the ivy.
Of course, campuses are larger than the
classroom and the message of liberal professors
might be drowned out by inappropriate speakers.
That's why our faculty and administrators are
careful to allocate the lion's share of funding to
invite still more liberals. After all, if not for
men like Ward Churchill, how would students come to
understand the innate evil of America? A true
conservative would never think to compare 9/11
victims to Nazis!
However, unfortunately for our Stalinist
friends, control over class time and tuition only
goes so far. Outspoken students might still
convince their peers that John Kerry and Karl Marx
don't have all the answers. Darn that First
Amendment. It was so useful for flag burning.
Some universities try to institute campus speech
codes, limiting dialogue to their understanding of
political correctness. Most just lambaste
conservative students. At UNC-Charlotte, the
resident College Republican chapter recently hosted
their third annual "affirmative action" bake sale.
Treats were offered at lower prices to
traditionally recognized minorities, protesting how
"affirmative action universities" accept minorities
with comparatively lower academic credentials.
Kristen McManus, UNC-Charlotte's Associate Director
for Academic Initiatives for Mentoring Students,
was quick to label her students as racist. Titling
the communiqué, "Racist Practice at UNCC,"
McManus e-mailed the press and warned them of the
College Republicans' "egregious methodology." After
this slur, will members of the UNC-Charlotte
College Republicans remain comfortable coming to
McManus for academic assistance? Would you feel
safe around someone who called you a racist?
All considered, however, campus conservatives
shouldn't feel too badly. The Stalinists will even
cannibalize a Clintonite for speaking out of turn.
When President Lawrence H. Summers of Harvard
University speculated aloud that "innate
differences" between the sexes might explain why
fewer women succeed in careers of math and science,
he was attacked by feminists and academics alike.
The former treasury secretary has been threatened
with a vote of no confidence by Harvard's faculty
and thus far, no one is willing to let him forget
his flub. I find it ironic that the presidents of
Stanford, MIT and Princeton are in an uproar over
their colleague's mere speculation, when none of
them were offended by the Berkeley study that
labeled conservatives as mentally ill.
Perhaps this sentiment is just a product of my
diseased, conservative mind, but I get the feeling
that academia isn't even fooling itself anymore.
After all, if professors pretend that free speech
rights exist on campus, someone might try to
exercise them.
Plecnik
Archive
John
T. Plecnik (JTP) is a 21-year-old law student at
Duke University and a Featured Columnist at The
Conservative Voice (www.theconservativevoice.com),
Lincoln Tribune, a weekly newspaper in
Lincolnton, NC., and various other online and print
publications. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in
Accounting with a Minor in Mythology and graduated
summa cum laude, sharing the title of
Valedictorian, from Belmont Abbey College. Email
your comments to John at John.Plecnik@law.duke.edu.
Copyright
(c) 2005 by John T. Plecnik. Reprinted with
permission.
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|