|
September
5, 2007
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part One
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part Two
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part Three
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part Four
Of Mice
and Mormons: Part Five
by Mike S. Adams, Ph.D.
On
August 26, 2004, Mr. Ford met with Professor
Wetchler, as Wetchler had requested via e-mail (see
Parts I, II, III, and IV of this series for
background information). At the outset of the
meeting, Wetchler stated that he was representing
all of the program faculty members when he said:
"You're not in trouble. This is an opportunity for
you to make changes because we are extremely
concerned about your behavior."
The behavior to which Professor Wetchler
referred was Mr. Ford's letter to the editor
regarding "same-sex marriage," which he had written
under the full protection of the First Amendment.
Nonetheless, Wetchler continued by explaining
exactly why the faculty was concerned about Mr.
Ford's letter to the editor: "If someone were to
recognize your name, it might misrepresent the
clinic, simply by your name." He explained that the
faculty wanted him "to stay underground, because we
are worried about you being a therapist and hurting
a lot of people with this type of article."
Professor Wetchler elaborated on why such a
letter to the editor might hurt people: "You are
creating a hostile environment for the program,
clients, and students." Wetchler tried to argue
that Mr. Ford had misquoted articles and
misrepresented data in his letter but Mr. Ford
declined to discuss the contents of the letter,
instead saying: "It is simply an expression of my
faith tradition which my religious doctrine compels
me to speak out."
Of course, Professor Wetchler did not see it
that way. He said: "This is not about religion or
First Amendment rights. It is about hurting people.
And you hurt a lot of people. Students have read
the article, other faculty in the department have
read the article (not that we are passing it
around) and you have hurt people." Wetchler
mentioned that Mr. Ford had "hurt people" at least
seven times and repeatedly pressed for an apology.
But Mr. Ford refused to deny his God in order to
appease his professor.
Professor Wetchler next commented that faculty
members were concerned about what Mr. Ford would
teach regarding single parent families, children of
divorced parents, and sexual identity as he was
scheduled to teach Introductory Psychology and
Adolescent Development in the upcoming semester.
Mr. Ford responded: "I adhere strictly to the
curriculum which I am given, and if it is
necessary, I can provide my lectures for
review."
Professor Wetchler then told Mr. Ford he was
"The most beloved student until three or four
months ago. Now the faculty are enraged with you.
None of the faculty, at this point, feel like they
could write you a letter of recommendation unless
you stop your aggressive behavior around LGBT
issues and stop creating a hostile
environment."
It sounded very much like a threat. Indeed, Mr.
Ford was being confronted with a choice between
following his God and following his career. Indeed,
for a marriage and family therapist, a doctoral
degree is essentially a professional requirement.
To get into a doctoral program, Mr. Ford needed
several letters of recommendation -- letters he had
planned to get from the professors who once loved
him.
As the conversation continued, Professor
Wetchler went on to declare that Mr. Ford's
"religious beliefs create a hostile environment."
Wetchler then demanded that Mr. Ford make several
behavior changes. First, he demanded that Mr. Ford
"come directly to people." Second, he demanded that
Mr. Ford "stop intimidating faculty." Third, he
demanded that Mr. Ford "work with Kent Pierce on
lectures dealing with single parents, children of
divorce, and sexual identity for the classes you
teach."
After this, Professor Wetchler requested
permission to ask Mr. Ford a personal question.
After receiving this permission, he asked: "Why are
you so interested in LGBT issues? For a guy as
sensitive as you are, you are insensitive in this
area." Mr. Ford responded that this was merely one
of many areas in which he had developed a
professional interest. Others included such topics
as parenting and marital relations. Wetchler
responded, "Yeah, but why LGBT?"
At this point, Mr. Ford responded: "What are you
getting at?" Professor Wetchler started to talk
about how much Mr. Ford had hurt his feelings, how
Mr. Ford was insensitive to his feelings when Mr.
Ford wanted to explore issues surrounding
homosexual conduct, and how much Mr. Ford's conduct
and positions hurt him.
Professor Wetchler concluded the meeting -- one
which had lasted nearly two hours -- by telling Mr.
Ford: "You are liked, but you are not beloved."
Wetchler also asked if he could review Mr. Ford's
notes from the meeting, a request which Mr. Ford
obliged. After reviewing them, Wetchler nodded in
agreement to what was written. Shortly thereafter,
Mr. Ford met with Mr. Ken Pierce, as Professor
Wetchler had instructed.
Mr. Pierce and Wetchler then decided that Mr.
Ford should submit his class materials to Ms. Ann
Edwards, an openly practicing lesbian, in order to
determine if they were suitable. When Mr. Ford met
with her in October, he described his classroom
techniques. She responded by saying: "Wow, you
sound as sensitive as they come." She repeatedly
assured him that he was being as sensitive and
tolerant as she could imagine.
Nonetheless, as late as August 2005, the
professors repeated their threats not to write
letters of recommendation on Mr. Ford's behalf. In
Mr. Ford's clinical work, many of his professors
also served as his supervisors. Frequently, they
would note his improvement, mention the letters of
recommendation issue, and then say, "You're not out
of the woods yet."
Then, one summer day, Professor Hecker was bored
and had nothing to do. So she passed along a copy
of Mr. Ford's letter to the editor to Ms.
Duffy-Greslo. Though she and Mr. Ford had been
friends, she gave him an ultimatum: he must change
his religious beliefs or she would no longer be his
friend.
Could it be that certain faculty members at
Purdue University Calumet were trying to destroy
this man's career in the long-term and make him
friendless and miserable in the short-term? It all
would have been so much simpler had he abandoned
his religious beliefs in deference to the wisdom of
the professoriate.
But Mr. Ford held firmly to his beliefs. And his
story continues...
To
Part Six
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part One
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part Two
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part Three
Of
Mice and Mormons: Part Four
Adams
Archive
©2007 by Mike S. Adams and reprinted with
permission of the author.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Order
Dr. Adams' Book
|
|
|
An irreverent, disturbing look at
higher education through the eyes of a
former Leftist radical whose
disillusionment with the politics of
diversity and political correctness turned
him into a "token" campus
Conservative.
Portrayed by the university
administration and mainstream media as a
"flame-thrower," Professor Adams lampoons
sacred cows such as affirmative action,
Gay Pride, cultural sensitivity training,
multi-culturalism, censorship and other
"sins" committed in the name of academic
freedom.
Dr. Mike S. Adams, a professor of
Criminal Justice at the University of
North Carolina at Wilmington, is a regular
contributor to conservative web and print
publications. He recently defended himself
against a charge of libel in a
high-profile free-speech controversy that
landed him on numerous top-ranked national
TV and radio shows, including Rush
Limbaugh, CNN and Hannity &
Colmes.
|
Welcome
to the Ivory Tower of Babel: Confessions
of a Conservative College
Professor,
by
Mike S. Adams
|
Mike
S. Adams was born in Columbus, Mississippi on
October 30, 1964. While a student at Clear Lake
High School in Houston, TX, his team won the state
5A soccer championship. He graduated from C.L.H.S.
in 1983 with a 1.8 GPA. He was ranked 734 among a
class of 740, largely as a result of flunking
English all four years of high school. After
obtaining an Associate's degree in psychology from
San Jacinto College, he moved on to Mississippi
State University where he joined the Sigma Chi
Fraternity. While living in the fraternity house,
his GPA rose to 3.4, allowing him to finish his
B.A., and then to pursue a Master's in Psychology.
In 1990, he turned down a chance to pursue a PhD in
psychology from the University of Georgia, opting
instead to remain at Mississippi State to study
Sociology/Criminology. This decision was made
entirely on the basis of his reluctance to quit his
night job as member of a musical duo. Playing music
in bars and at fraternity parties and weddings
financed his education. He also played for free
beer.
Upon
getting his doctorate in 1993, Adams, then an
atheist and a Democrat, was hired by UNC-Wilmington
to teach in the criminal justice program. A few
years later, Adams abandoned his atheism and also
became a Republican. He also nearly abandoned
teaching when he took a one-year leave of absence
to study law at UNC-Chapel Hill in 1998. After
returning to teach at UNC-Wilmington, Adams won the
Faculty Member of the Year award (issued by the
Office of the Dean of Students) for the second time
in 2000.
After
his involvement in a well publicized free speech
controversy in the wake of the 911 terror attacks,
Adams became a vocal critic of the diversity
movement in academia. After making appearances on
shows like Hannity and Colmes, the O'Reilly Factor,
and Scarborough Country, Adams was asked to write a
column for the Heritage Foundation's
Townhall.com.
Today
he enjoys the privilege of expressing himself both
as a teacher and a writer. In his spare time, he
loves spending time with his wife, Krysten. He is
also an avid hunter and reader of classic
literature.
Visit his website at http://www.DrAdams.org.
E-mail: adams_mike@hotmail.com
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|