|
October
1, 2007
My
Constitutional Right to be Loved
by Mike S. Adams, Ph.D.
Dear
Fellow UNC-Wilmington Professor:
I want to take a few minutes to thank you for
sharing your views on abortion while I was
urinating in the men's restroom at our place of
employment. I didn't mind learning that your
support for abortion is predicated on your belief
that every child in America has a "constitutional
right to be loved." But I did mind that you tapped
me on the shoulder to get my attention while I was
facing in the other direction with my pants
unzipped. Try your best to keep your hands off me
the next time you see me in a public restroom
unless, of course, you plan to run for the United
States Senate.
Naturally, by the time I zipped up my trousers I
began to contemplate your rationale for keeping
abortion legal in America. I quickly fell in love
with your method of expanding the number of rights
guaranteed by our Constitution. Since you shared
your "strong feeling" that all children have a
constitutional right to be loved, I thought I would
take a moment to share my strong feelings in the
hope that these feelings will somehow be elevated
to constitutional status despite the fact that they
don't actually appear in the Constitution:
I strongly feel like I have a right to be
free from funding a public education system that
tries to advance an agenda diametrically opposed to
my most cherished religious beliefs.
I strongly feel like I have a right to
walk across campus without seeing a feminist from
the Women's Resource Center showing students how to
put a condom on a cucumber. (I can't imagine why
that silly feminist thought her cucumber could get
her pregnant. Or maybe she thought it was
pleasuring another feminist behind her back).
I strongly feel like I have a right to
buy gas for less than two dollars per gallon.
I strongly feel like I have a right to be
loved by Jessica Alba.
I strongly feel like I have a right to be
free from seeing women dressed in mini-skirts while
(they are, not I am) wearing snow boots.
I strongly feel like I have a right to
free health care paid for by the citizens of
France. They wouldn't still be speaking French if
it weren't for Americans so I figure they owe us
one. (Author's note: I also reserve the right to
use double negatives or to not use them if I don't
feel like it).
I strongly feel like I have a right to
have illegal aliens work in my yard free of charge
on weekends. It's the least they can do for wasting
so much of my time by making it hard to find a
parking space at Home Depot.
I strongly feel like I have a right to
urinate in a public restroom without having you
touch me on the shoulder.
Unfortunately, the list of things I would emote
into the Constitution (if given the chance) fails
to capture the total absurdity of your argument.
Give me a few more lines to try and catch up.
I strongly feel that whenever my constitutional
rights are violated, someone should die. For
example:
The Governor of North Carolina should be
killed if he does not immediately sign an executive
order fulfilling my strong desire to be free from
supporting the pitiful public education system of
this state.
The next feminist from the Women's
Resource Center I see instructing students on how
to put a condom on a cucumber should be killed.
President Bush should be killed because
his "War for Oil" has failed to bring gas prices
below two dollars per gallon (note to Secret
Service: THIS IS A SATIRE). Jessica Alba
should be killed for not loving me.
All women dressed in mini-skirts and
wearing snow boots should be killed. We
should kill the citizens of France for failing to
provide me with free health care.
Illegal aliens unwilling to work in my
yard free of charge on weekends should be
killed.
You should be killed for touching me on
the shoulder in a public restroom.
But of course, learned full professor, I still
have not matched the absurdity of your pro-choice
argument. To this point, I have made the more
rational argument that the person who has violated
a constitutional right should be punished by being
killed. Your position, of course, is even more
absurd. You argue that the person whose
constitutional right has been violated should be
killed. Hence, I propose the following in an effort
to reach (down to) your level of intellectual
(un)sophistication:
The governor should order that I be
killed immediately if the governor does not sign an
executive order fulfilling my strong desire to be
free from supporting the pitiful public education
system of this state.
I should be killed by a feminist the next
time I see a feminist from the Women's Resource
Center showing students how to put a condom on a
cucumber.
President Bush should order that I be
killed because the "War for Oil" has failed to
bring gas prices below two dollars per gallon.
I should be killed by Jessica Alba
because Jessica Alba does not love me.
I should be killed by a woman dressed in
a mini-skirt and snow boots the next time I see a
woman dressed in a mini-skirt and snow boots.
I should be killed by the citizens of
France because they failed to provide me with free
health care (and, not to mention, maternal
love).
Illegal aliens should kill me because
they are unwilling to inconvenience themselves by
working in my yard free of charge on weekends -- an
inconvenience not quite on par with a lifetime
commitment to parenthood.
You should kill me because you touched me
on the shoulder in a public restroom in violation
of my constitutional rights.
Many of my readers are wondering how a tenured
professor could accrue a level of intellectual
arrogance severe enough to produce a belief that he
may, a) invent constitutional rights, b) enforce
them via the death penalty, c) remedy the
constitutional violation by the murder of the
person (note: the professor admitted that the fetus
was a "child") whose rights were violated, and d)
allow the killing to actually be ordered by the
perpetrator.
Fortunately for my readers, I will address the
origins of such arrogance in my next column. I
strongly feel like I have a right for you to read
it. If you choose not to, feel free to kill me.
Adams
Archive
©2007 by Mike S. Adams and reprinted with
permission of the author.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Order
Dr. Adams' Book
|
|
|
An irreverent, disturbing look at
higher education through the eyes of a
former Leftist radical whose
disillusionment with the politics of
diversity and political correctness turned
him into a "token" campus
Conservative.
Portrayed by the university
administration and mainstream media as a
"flame-thrower," Professor Adams lampoons
sacred cows such as affirmative action,
Gay Pride, cultural sensitivity training,
multi-culturalism, censorship and other
"sins" committed in the name of academic
freedom.
Dr. Mike S. Adams, a professor of
Criminal Justice at the University of
North Carolina at Wilmington, is a regular
contributor to conservative web and print
publications. He recently defended himself
against a charge of libel in a
high-profile free-speech controversy that
landed him on numerous top-ranked national
TV and radio shows, including Rush
Limbaugh, CNN and Hannity &
Colmes.
|
Welcome
to the Ivory Tower of Babel: Confessions
of a Conservative College
Professor,
by
Mike S. Adams
|
Mike
S. Adams was born in Columbus, Mississippi on
October 30, 1964. While a student at Clear Lake
High School in Houston, TX, his team won the state
5A soccer championship. He graduated from C.L.H.S.
in 1983 with a 1.8 GPA. He was ranked 734 among a
class of 740, largely as a result of flunking
English all four years of high school. After
obtaining an Associate's degree in psychology from
San Jacinto College, he moved on to Mississippi
State University where he joined the Sigma Chi
Fraternity. While living in the fraternity house,
his GPA rose to 3.4, allowing him to finish his
B.A., and then to pursue a Master's in Psychology.
In 1990, he turned down a chance to pursue a PhD in
psychology from the University of Georgia, opting
instead to remain at Mississippi State to study
Sociology/Criminology. This decision was made
entirely on the basis of his reluctance to quit his
night job as member of a musical duo. Playing music
in bars and at fraternity parties and weddings
financed his education. He also played for free
beer.
Upon
getting his doctorate in 1993, Adams, then an
atheist and a Democrat, was hired by UNC-Wilmington
to teach in the criminal justice program. A few
years later, Adams abandoned his atheism and also
became a Republican. He also nearly abandoned
teaching when he took a one-year leave of absence
to study law at UNC-Chapel Hill in 1998. After
returning to teach at UNC-Wilmington, Adams won the
Faculty Member of the Year award (issued by the
Office of the Dean of Students) for the second time
in 2000.
After
his involvement in a well publicized free speech
controversy in the wake of the 911 terror attacks,
Adams became a vocal critic of the diversity
movement in academia. After making appearances on
shows like Hannity and Colmes, the O'Reilly Factor,
and Scarborough Country, Adams was asked to write a
column for the Heritage Foundation's
Townhall.com.
Today
he enjoys the privilege of expressing himself both
as a teacher and a writer. In his spare time, he
loves spending time with his wife, Krysten. He is
also an avid hunter and reader of classic
literature.
Visit his website at http://www.DrAdams.org.
E-mail: adams_mike@hotmail.com
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|