|
December
17, 2007
Alexander
the Mediocre
by Mike S. Adams, Ph.D.
Recently,
I gave a speech at Bucknell University, during
which I urged responsible citizens to consider gun
ownership -- carefully explaining that certain
people ought not to own firearms. I also urged
those who would qualify to obtain a concealed carry
permit (CCW). Finally, I talked about the need to
change gun laws to stop mass murders inside
"gun-free zones."
Alexander Tristan Riley, a sociology professor
at Bucknell, was "unable to attend" the talk but,
nonetheless, offered a scathing criticism of the
event in a letter to The Counterweight, which is
Bucknell's conservative student newspaper. In his
letter, Alexander described my ideas on firearms as
simple-minded. As an example, he claimed: "(Adams)
believes that anyone who thinks that more effective
record-keeping of firearms transactions is a good
public policy idea is adequately described as
'statist.'"
In reality, I referred to a woman who could not
state unequivocally that a government form should
not be required every time a weapon is taken from a
gun safe as a "statist." I added: "And if you
cannot answer simple questions about gun control,
you may be a statist, too."
Obviously, I never said that "anyone" opposed to
"more effective record-keeping" is a "statist."
This raises the question of whether Alexander
Tristan Riley is illiterate or simply a liar. One
can only assume the latter since he is writing
letters to the editor about events he was "unable
to attend."
Alexander also stated that my idea that MLK Day
should be replaced with a John Browning Day was
"truly bizarre and ludicrous." He tried to suggest
that my reasoning for Browning Day was based solely
on the fact that he invented a firearm responsible
for killing more deer in America than any other. He
failed to mention that my reasoning was also based
on the fact that Browning's inventions helped us
preserve freedom (read: civil rights) for all by
winning two world wars. This is approximately two
more world wars than MLK helped us win -- although
I do acknowledge that he was our second greatest
civil rights leader.
This kind of reporting by Alexander raises the
question of whether he is illiterate or just very
simple-minded. One can only assume the latter since
he is writing letters to the editor about events he
was "unable to attend."
Alexander was also very upset about the fact
that I have my NRA membership listed on my
university webpage as a "professional membership."
I put it there because so many of my colleagues in
the field have memberships in societies with words
like "feminist" and "critical" in the title of the
organization. Since those are obviously political
groups -- critical, for example, means "Marxist" or
"communist" -- I thought I would put an obviously
political group among my "professional membership"
listings. This was to see whether any hypocritical
sociologists or criminologists would be critical of
the NRA but not critical of the "critical."
Alexander took the bait. I could have explained
it all at the lecture had he the courage to attend.
Perhaps he could have explained why he
characterized me as an "extremist" in his letter.
After all, I'm not a member of a communist
"professional" organization. I'm only in the NRA --
an organization many times larger than the total
communist population of the United States.
In addition to calling me an "extremist"
Alexander used the term "extremist" to describe the
leadership of the NRA, which he ultimately
characterized as a "fringe group." The reason for
the tantrum of name-calling was our supposed
opposition to "more effective and rational gun
policy." But Alexander nowhere states what
"rational gun policy" I oppose.
After attacking both me and the NRA leadership,
Alexander attacked the Bucknell conservatives for
circulating an email with survey results from a
study by Gary Kleck. He said that "an organization
made up of students at a university" should "better
inform itself" before uncritically repeating the
statistics like "gun extremists and bloggers on the
Internet." He added that "experts" who "actually do
research on these matters" have found "significant
problems with them." But a cursory examination of
his vita shows that he is not one of those
sociologists doing "research on these matters."
Alexander mentioned the notion of "scholarly
consensus" in the final sentence of his letter to
the editor. But he said nothing about the fact that
fifteen refereed publications have shown that CCW
laws reduce homicide rates while zero studies show
that they increase them. That was really the major
theme of the speech that Alexander was "unable to
attend."
But, thank God that just days after my speech a
former law enforcement officer with a CCW was "able
to attend" church in Colorado when an
anti-Christian bigot came in opening fire while in
possession of 1000 rounds of ammunition. In stark
contrast to the cowardice of a sociologist who
cannot attend lectures - or back up his letters
that criticize the lectures he missed with relevant
facts - she exhibited true courage. After asking
her God for guidance, she drew her weapon and
calmly felled a psychopath who then ended his own
life in humiliation. In the process she certainly
saved dozens of innocent lives.
As I said in my talk at Bucknell, we must
empower the innocent citizen with a CCW that will
help him to protect both self and others. But,
perhaps I should have said "her." Some "men" are
simply not up to the task and, hence, too cowardly
to even discuss the issue with those willing to
return fire, intellectually speaking.
Adams
Archive
©2007 by Mike S. Adams and reprinted with
permission of the author.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Order
Dr. Adams' Book
|
|
|
An irreverent, disturbing look at
higher education through the eyes of a
former Leftist radical whose
disillusionment with the politics of
diversity and political correctness turned
him into a "token" campus
Conservative.
Portrayed by the university
administration and mainstream media as a
"flame-thrower," Professor Adams lampoons
sacred cows such as affirmative action,
Gay Pride, cultural sensitivity training,
multi-culturalism, censorship and other
"sins" committed in the name of academic
freedom.
Dr. Mike S. Adams, a professor of
Criminal Justice at the University of
North Carolina at Wilmington, is a regular
contributor to conservative web and print
publications. He recently defended himself
against a charge of libel in a
high-profile free-speech controversy that
landed him on numerous top-ranked national
TV and radio shows, including Rush
Limbaugh, CNN and Hannity &
Colmes.
|
Welcome
to the Ivory Tower of Babel: Confessions
of a Conservative College
Professor,
by
Mike S. Adams
|
Mike
S. Adams was born in Columbus, Mississippi on
October 30, 1964. While a student at Clear Lake
High School in Houston, TX, his team won the state
5A soccer championship. He graduated from C.L.H.S.
in 1983 with a 1.8 GPA. He was ranked 734 among a
class of 740, largely as a result of flunking
English all four years of high school. After
obtaining an Associate's degree in psychology from
San Jacinto College, he moved on to Mississippi
State University where he joined the Sigma Chi
Fraternity. While living in the fraternity house,
his GPA rose to 3.4, allowing him to finish his
B.A., and then to pursue a Master's in Psychology.
In 1990, he turned down a chance to pursue a PhD in
psychology from the University of Georgia, opting
instead to remain at Mississippi State to study
Sociology/Criminology. This decision was made
entirely on the basis of his reluctance to quit his
night job as member of a musical duo. Playing music
in bars and at fraternity parties and weddings
financed his education. He also played for free
beer.
Upon
getting his doctorate in 1993, Adams, then an
atheist and a Democrat, was hired by UNC-Wilmington
to teach in the criminal justice program. A few
years later, Adams abandoned his atheism and also
became a Republican. He also nearly abandoned
teaching when he took a one-year leave of absence
to study law at UNC-Chapel Hill in 1998. After
returning to teach at UNC-Wilmington, Adams won the
Faculty Member of the Year award (issued by the
Office of the Dean of Students) for the second time
in 2000.
After
his involvement in a well publicized free speech
controversy in the wake of the 911 terror attacks,
Adams became a vocal critic of the diversity
movement in academia. After making appearances on
shows like Hannity and Colmes, the O'Reilly Factor,
and Scarborough Country, Adams was asked to write a
column for the Heritage Foundation's
Townhall.com.
Today
he enjoys the privilege of expressing himself both
as a teacher and a writer. In his spare time, he
loves spending time with his wife, Krysten. He is
also an avid hunter and reader of classic
literature.
Visit his website at http://www.DrAdams.org.
E-mail: adams_mike@hotmail.com
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|