|
April
1, 2007
Why
Democrats Have Not Cut Off the War's
Funding
by Gary North, Ph.D.
Why
don't liberals ever suggest that the government
lower taxes after a war is over?
I have watched liberal politicians for 50 years.
I have never heard one of them call for tax
reductions after a war. Always, they say, "Now
let's spend the money that the IRS collected, plus
the money we borrowed, on the poor. Don't lower
taxes."
With whatever money the public was willing to
pay to fund the war, the Democrats want to spend
forever: to seek votes of the poor and votes of
guilt-ridden middle class liberals.
This is why you rarely see liberals vote
against a war. They love what war does: it
expands the level of taxes that voters will accept.
Then, when the war goes sour -- and only
then -- they call for peace. They don't call very
loudly. The only way for Congress to get peace
is to cut off the funding. But Democrats
refuse to do this because they hate tax cuts more
than they hate war.
Jim Wallis is typical. He calls himself a
radical Christian. He campaigns as a defender of
peace. That is all to the good. But he does not
send out letters telling his donors to call on
Congress to stop the war's funding immediately.
That would alienate his Democrat donors and his
contacts on Capitol Hill, who are unwilling to do
anything this controversial. Instead, he calls for
an end to the war on these terms: the government
gets to keep all the money that went for the war,
permanently, in order to give to welfare
bureaucrats to spend on the poor (after deducting
their salaries and overhead).
Liberals have done this ever since 1945. The
result? Ever higher Defense Department spending,
and not much welfare spending by comparison.
Liberals are incurably naïve. They think
the U.S. government will quit spending on
war-related items just because a war ends. But
military spending always goes up. Liberals never do
get their hands on most of the post-war loot. They
do not learn from experience.
It was President Eisenhower, a Republican, who
warned in his farewell address against the
military-industrial complex. His successor, John F.
Kennedy, won the election in 1960 because he said
there was a missile gap between the USA and the
USSR. (There wasn't, and he
knew there wasn't during the campaign.)
With this as background, listen to Wallis's
March 28, 2007 appeal to his supporters.
- Tell Congress to Pass a Moral Budget.
Congress is deciding on the outlines of this
year's federal budget. At stake are billions of
dollars for working families and poor children
in the United States and around the globe.
-
- For years now, people of faith have been
fighting bad budgets that prioritize tax cuts
and military spending over social supports for
the poorest in our society. This year, Congress
has an opportunity to pass a budget that puts
people first.
-
- Tell your representative to vote for a moral
budget that honors our commitment to "the least
of these"!
There is a saying among some fundamentalists,
"Once saved, always saved!" Wallis has rewritten
it: "Once taxed, always taxed!"
Gary
North Archive
Dr.
Gary North earned a Ph.D. in history and is one of
America's keenest economic analysts and
commentators. He supports the Austrian school of
economics and is a previous assistant to
libertarian congressman Dr. Ron Paul. Visit his
website at http://garynorth.com.
To
subscribe to Gary North's Reality Check go to
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/sub/GetReality.cfm
If
you enjoyed this essay and would like to read more
of Gary's writing please visit his website at
http://www.garynorth.com
or http://www.freebooks.com
Articles
& Essays Index
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|