|
August
18, 2009
Wikipedia
and Google Will Bring Down
Establishments All Over the World
by Gary North, Ph.D.
Back
in the early 1990's, I was told about a German
economist with an American name: Paul C. Martin. He
had written a book titled Paymaster Germany.
Its thesis: Germany cannot send home its Turkish
and other immigrants. They would break the German
economy by pulling their money out of the country.
Anyway, that's what my German contacts told me
about the book. It has never been translated.
Recently, I did a search for "Paul C. Martin." I
got a page. The #2 entry was a Wikipedia article on
him. It is in German. You can find the page
here.
There is an option available on the Google
entry: Translate this page. I clicked it.
Within a few seconds, I had the article in English.
Wiki knew I read English.
The article is readable. There are some minor
grammatical errors, but I can easily get the gist
of it. The author's books are listed in
English.
Wiki is available in dozens of languages. It is
replacing all other general encyclopedias. The
division of labor is working.
If you find a Wiki entry with an error, you can
correct it using the Edit feature. I do this
from time to time. I don't get paid, but I want
things right. This mentality is widespread among
Wiki users. The articles keep getting better.
If readers of encyclopedias were evil-minded,
they would deface the entries by adding lies. Yet
this is not done often, and the errors are found
and corrected rapidly.
Ideological wars do break out. Then the page is
locked by a committee. You have to apply to update
the entry. If there were many such disputes, it
would be impossible to sort them out. There would
not be enough volunteers to serve on the
committees.
The Wiki system relies on volunteers. It works.
It relies on honest intentions. This usually works.
It relies on digital translation. This works well
enough to allow the transmission of basic
information -- more than most readers can remember.
Our minds are the weak links now, not the
translation software.
The translation software will get better. In 20
years, it will probably rival the skills of a human
translator who did not learn both languages as a
bi-lingual child. It may take less time than 20
years.
This will increase the division of intellectual
labor. It will vastly expand our horizons. Already,
we can find out what other nationalities think
about such topics as the origin of specific
wars.
The way we learn about history will change for
the better. Revisionist history will spread. The
Establishments of all nations will suffer.
Wiki has dramatically increased the world's
intellectual division of labor by providing
software and open access posting. It is
self-policed. This lets decentralization find a
central location on the Web. Type in any topic and
the type "Wiki." Click. You will find it on Google
instantly.
Where did the creator of Wiki get this idea on
the intellectual division of labor? From a dead
economist, F. A. Hayek, who write a 1945 article on
"The Use of Knowledge in Society," one of the most
important articles in the history of economics. Who
told him about Hayek? Mark Thornton, staff
economist at the Mises Institute. What organization
makes spectacular use of the Web through posting
free
books in PDF? The Mises Institute.
Neither Google nor Wikipedia existed a decade
ago.
Then there is the sheer volume of local
historical materials. Think of American Civil War
history if every small-town newspaper were on-line.
Researchers could compare accounts of battles. The
same goes for archives of letters.
On the top floor of the library at Louisiana
State University at Shreveport, there is an
astounding collection of antiquarian books. It
was assembled by an eccentric millionaire. There is
a full-time curator. I have seen this collection.
It is mind-boggling. There is a large section on
Civil War memorial books written by specific army
units. Yet almost no one knows of this collection.
In effect, it is closed to the general public
because of a lack of publicity.
Let me provide another example. A prominent
university in the South has the largest collection
of Ku Klux Klan material anywhere. I was informed
by a far-left Ph.D. historian whose grandfather was
the first professor of psychology at that
university in 1918 that if you were not a Klan
member, you were not hired to be on the faculty.
This is hearsay. I happen to believe it. He told me
about the KKK collection. Almost no one knows it is
there, except for Klan members who are interested
in historical scholarship. This is a limited
audience. The library does not publicize its
existence. Why not? Because questions might be
raised about the origin of the collection.
Political incorrectness affects libraries.
ON-LINE LIBRARIES
Collection by collection, Google will scan tens
of millions of books and post them. Probably 80% of
the world's pre-1923 books will be online in 50
years -- maybe less. All it will take is manpower
and cheap scanning machines, which keep getting
cheaper.
It is possible to have a book scanned and
converted to a Google-searchable PDF file for 16
cents a page if you allow the outfit to cut the
spine of the book. It's 36 cents if you don't allow
this. You can set up a website for $10 a year for
domain name hosting, plus an extra $10 if you want
your identity as the owner concealed from snoopers.
Use Hostgator or Hostmonster to host an unlimited
number of domains for $8 a month. You can post
PDFs.
In every language these books will be online.
They will eventually be translated digitally "on
the fly."
Then will come archive collections of letters.
They will take longer to convert to searchable
typeset words. But that day will come.
The cost of writing history will fall. It is
costly to do research in a major research library.
You must pay for the plane fair, overnight housing,
and a rental car. This can easily cost $300 a day
-- or three times that in cities like London or
Berlin. Only a few people can afford this, and only
for short visits.
If the library's pre-1923 books and archive
materials were online, anyone could do it at home.
The little guy would be able to compete.
Say that you want access to all academic
journals. These are all on-line. It is expensive to
access them. You must be an enrolled student or a
faculty member to access them. Solution? Hire a
student intern who has on-line access to the
library. Then have the student look up the articles
you want to read and send PDFs to you. Or just use
his access code to do your own research. "That's
cheating," says the librarian. But taxpayers pay
for the library. I suffer little guilt.
Every time you find a Google link to a locked
article on JSTOR, you contact your intern. Presto.
Unlocked!
Some interns work for free to gain college
credit. Do I have access to such an intern? To ask
this question is to answer it.
Soon, brains and insight will rule, not bank
accounts and official accreditation by state
licensing bureaus. The Establishments will all be
in defensive mode.
It is happening today. This is going to
increase.
Truth will fragment. New paradigms will emerge
from the competition. The quality of thought will
improve when bank accounts are not major barriers
to entry.
THE GATEKEEPERS' DILEMMA
The gatekeepers can no longer control the flow
of information. This has never happened in man's
history. Gatekeepers still control the gates. But
the walls have holes in them. These holes are
widening.
The gatekeepers control accreditation. They no
longer control content except where it is very
expensive to do primary research, such as nuclear
physics. In the social sciences and humanities,
it's just about over.
When I think "Establishment," my mind goes back
to Rocky III. Mr. T's character tells Apollo
Creed, "you're going down."
If you find something worth posting, post it.
Call this "post-it notes." It beats armed
revolution every time.
Make a free online YouTube or Blip.tv course out
of your favorite controversial topic. Imitate
Salman Khan: www.KhanAcademy.org.
(Note: Khan graduated from MIT and the Harvard
Business School.) He did it with these
low-cost or free tools.
In short, if you find something evil that
wobbles, push it.
Gary
North Archive
Dr.
Gary North earned a Ph.D. in history and is one of
America's keenest economic analysts and
commentators. He supports the Austrian school of
economics and is a previous assistant to
libertarian congressman Dr. Ron Paul. Visit his
website at http://garynorth.com.
To
subscribe to Gary North's Reality Check go to
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/sub/GetReality.cfm
If
you enjoyed this essay and would like to read more
of Gary's writing please visit his website at
http://www.garynorth.com
or http://www.freebooks.com
Articles
& Essays Index
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|