|
July
12, 2007
Defend the
Constitution!
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
Recently,
the General Accounting Office studied nineteen
instances where the President issued so-called
"signing statements." In such statements, the
President essentially begins the process of
interpreting legislation -- up to and including
declaring provisions unconstitutional -- hence
often refusing to enforce them.
The GAO study found that in nearly 1/3 of the
cases studied, the administration failed to enforce
the law as enacted. This approach is especially
worrisome for several reasons.
First, these signing statements tend to move
authority from the legislative branch to the
executive, thus upsetting our delicate system of
checks and balances. Next, these statements grant
the President power not given by the Constitution,
allowing him to usurp powers of the judicial
branch. Finally, the idea of agencies refusing to
enforce the law as enacted sets precedent for the
type of runaway administrative actions our
constitution was expressly enacted in order to
avoid.
Although these signing statements are at record
high numbers, the problem is not with a single
administration. Contrary to the claims of those who
raise this issue for purely political purposes, the
most significant challenge to liberty presented by
these statements is that they can serve to further
erode our constitutional republic.
I have long been skeptical of the line item veto
on spending bills for the same reason I oppose
these signing statements. The legislature should
not yield its authority to the executive. Our
constitutional republic demands that all branches
of government understand and respect our system and
jealously guard their own prerogatives.
In modern Washington nothing is more
misunderstood, and less appreciated, than the
genius of republicanism. Presidents issue signing
statements that effectively "approve in part and
reject in part," laws of the land -- even though
there is no constitutional provision for such a
process. In addition, Congress cedes its powers at
the crucial moment when a decision on whether or
not a war is to be fought will be made, only to
then criticize the effort it could have used its
powers to stop.
In his Notes on Virginia, Thomas Jefferson spoke
clearly and directly about the idea of elected
representatives delegating their responsibility to
other branches of government, saying in no
uncertain terms that since such representatives had
received their authority by delegation from the
people -- expressly for the use as representative
-- the legislature had to choose to either use the
authority granted or return it to the people. In
other words, there is to be no delegation of
authority from the representatives to the executive
branch of government.
Concerns with signing statements ought to
include a concern for the health of our
constitutional republic, it ought not to be based
upon the political battle of the day. Regardless of
whether the President is named Bush or Clinton, and
without respect to any particular political
interest, we in Congress need to fulfill our oath
of office and protect and defend the constitution
and our republic. Our constituents deserve no less,
and should demand it of all of us.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|