|
August
17, 2007
High-Risk
Spending
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
Last
week this column addressed the train wreck that
federal spending has become. To score political
points politicians will make loud noise about
fairly small matters such as earmarks, even while
refusing to address the real problem. Namely, that
our federal government is too big and does too
much. Politicians prefer to pass a bill or create a
program every time somebody points to a new social
problem; this way they can tell their constituents
how much they are doing to help. Instead of
rationally explaining the proper role of
government, politicians have attempted to play the
role of friend, preacher, parent, social worker,
etcetera -- in essence, whatever any organized
special interest can demand.
Waste, fraud and abuse are often easy targets.
Everybody knows a story of the government doing
something absolutely ridiculous and wasteful. Plus,
recent headlines have been packed with stories of
corruption in Washington.
One thing that has not drawn enough attention is
the link between the size of government and the
mismanagement that leads to wasted money. If the
government was restrained within its proper
constitutional functions, it would be far better
managed and much more readily would proper
oversight occur.
You see, while waste, fraud and abuse are very
easy to attack, it seems they are much more
difficult to actually address within the current
federal behemoth. For example, the General
Accounting Office (GAO) puts out a "high risk list"
and describes this list as programs with
"vulnerabilities to fraud, waste and abuse and
mismanagement."
There are currently 27 programs and operations
on this list, up from 26 last year. But here are
the more surprising facts: The list was originated
with 14 programs in 1990. Of those original 14
programs, from 17 years ago, only 8 have been
removed. How can it be that 6 programs remain on
such a list nearly two decades later? While
government is supposed to move slowly, this is
ridiculous.
What the GAO is saying is that a problem exists,
we have been aware of it for 17 years, and it is
still not corrected. Of course, with the size and
scope of federal activity, including attempting to
rebuild societies in the middle east, and massively
expanding federal involvement in education (along
with thousands of other "programs"), it is small
wonder that this list doesn't really get addressed.
Yet it does seem reasonable to ask "If you can't
stop waste in 6 federal programs after 17 years,
how exactly will you improve local schools or
foreign nations?"
In the time that the GAO list has existed, there
have been 33 additions and a mere 18 removals,
including two this year. Only when the people
demand the federal government stop trying to meet
any and all demands, and instead return to a
constitutionally limited republic, will the list of
programs subject to waste, fraud and abuse be
dramatically reduced. While government will never
be perfect, a limited government is far more able
to not only identify problems, but to actually
correct them.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|