|
November
1, 2007
Struggling
for Relevance in Cuba
Close,
Still No Cigars
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
Since
Raul Castro seems to be transitioning to a more
permanent position of power, the administration has
begun talking about Cuba policy again. One would
think we would be able to survey the results of the
last 45 years and come to logical conclusions.
Changing course never seems to be an option,
however, no matter how futile or counterproductive
our past actions have been.
The Cuban embargo began officially in 1962 as a
means to put pressure on the communist dictatorship
to change its ways. After 45 years, the Cuban
economy has struggled, but Cuba 's dictatorship is
no closer to stepping to the beat of our drum. Any
ailments have consistently and successfully been
blamed on US Capitalism instead of Cuban Communism.
They have substituted trade with others for trade
with the US, and are "awash" with development funds
from abroad. Our isolationist policies with regards
to Cuba, meanwhile, have hardly won the hearts and
minds of Cubans or Cuban-Americans, many of whom
are isolated from families because of this
political animosity.
In the name of helping Cubans, the US
administration is calling for "multibillions" of
taxpayer dollars in foreign aid and subsidies for
internet access, education and business development
for Cubans under the condition that the Cuban
government demonstrates certain changes. In the
same breath, they claim lifting the embargo would
only help the dictatorship. This is exactly
backwards. Free trade is the best thing for people
in both Cuba and the US. Government subsidies would
enrich those in power in Cuba at the expense of
already overtaxed Americans!
The irony of supposed Capitalist,
free-marketeers inducing Communists to freedom with
government hand-outs should not be missed. We call
for a free and private press in Cuba while our
attempts to propagandize Cubans through the US
government-run Radio/TV Marti has wasted $600
million in American taxpayer dollars.
It's time to stop talking solely in terms of
what's best for the Cuban people. How about the
wishes of the American people, who are consistently
in favor of diplomacy with Cuba? Let's stop the
hysterics about the freedom of Cubans -- which is
not our government's responsibility -- and consider
freedom of the American people, which is. Americans
want the freedom to travel and trade with their
Cuban neighbors, as they are free to travel and
trade with Vietnam and China. Those Americans who
do not wish to interact with a country whose model
of governance they oppose are free to boycott. The
point being -- it is Americans who live in a free
country, and as free people we should choose who to
buy from or where to travel, not our
government.
Our current administration is perceived as
irrelevant, at best, in Cuba and the message is
falling on deaf ears there. If the administration
really wanted to extend the hand of friendship,
they would allow the American people the freedom to
act as their own ambassadors through trade and
travel. Considering the lack of success government
has had in engendering friendship with Cuba, it is
time for government to get out of the way and let
the people reach out.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|