|
March
5, 2008
Monetary
Policy and the State of the Economy
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
A
Statement to the House Financial Services
Committee, February 27, 2008:
Mr. Chairman,
A topic that is on the lips of many people
during the past few months, and one with which I
have greatly concerned myself, is that of moral
hazard. We hear cries from all corners, from
politicians, journalists, economists, businessmen,
and citizens, clamoring for the federal government
to intervene in the economy in order to forestall a
calamitous recession. During the boom, many of
these same individuals called for no end to the
Fed's easy credit. Now that the consequences of
that easy money policy are coming home to roost, no
one wants to face those ill effects.
We have already seen a plan from the
administration to freeze mortgages, a plan which is
alleged to be only a temporary program. As with
other programs that have come through this
committee, I believe we ought to learn from history
and realize that "temporary" programs are almost
anything but temporary. When this program expires
and mortgage rates reset, we will see new calls for
a rate-freeze plan, maybe for two years, maybe for
five, or maybe for more.
Some drastic proposals have called for the
federal government to purchase existing mortgages
and take upon itself the process of rewriting these
and guaranteeing the resulting new mortgages. Aside
from exposing the government to tens of billions of
dollars of potentially defaulting mortgages, the
burden of which will ultimately fall on the
taxpayers, this type of plan would embed the
federal government even deeper into the housing
market and perpetuate instability. The Congress
has, over the past decades, relentlessly pushed for
increased rates of homeownership among people who
have always been viewed by the market as poor
credit risks. Various means and incentives have
been used by the government, but behind all the
actions of lenders has been an implicit belief in a
federal bailout in the event of a crisis.
What all of these proposed bailouts fail to
mention is the moral hazard to which bailouts lead.
If the federal government bails out banks,
investors, or homeowners, the lessons of sound
investment and fiscal discipline will not take
hold. We can see this in the financial markets in
the boom and bust of the business cycle. The Fed's
manipulation of interest rates results in
malinvestment which, when it is discovered, leads
to economic contraction and liquidation of
malinvested resources. But the Fed never allows a
complete shakeout, so that before a return to a
sound market can occur, the Fed has already bailed
out numerous market participants by undertaking
another bout of loose money before the effects of
the last business cycle have worked their way
through the economy.
Many market actors therefore continue to
undertake risky investments and expect that in the
future, if their investments go south, that the Fed
would and should intervene by creating more money
and credit. The result of these bailouts is that
each successive recession runs the risk of becoming
larger and more severe, requiring a stronger
reaction by the Fed. Eventually, however, the Fed
begins to run out of room in which to maneuver, a
problem we are facing today.
I urge my colleagues to resist the temptation to
call for easy fixes in the form of bailouts. If we
fail to address and stem the problem of moral
hazard, we are doomed to experience repeated severe
economic crises.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|