|
May
23, 2008
March to War
in Lebanon?
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
Statement
on H Res 1194, "Reaffirming the support of the
House of Representatives for the legitimate,
democratically-elected Government of Lebanon under
Prime Minister Fouad Siniora":
Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to H. Res.
1194 because it is dangerously interventionist and
will likely lead to more rather than less violence
in the Middle East.
I have noticed that this legislation reads
eerily similar to a key clause in the 2002 Iraq war
bill, H J Res 114, which authorized the use of
force.
The key resolved clause in H. Res. 1194 before
us today reads:
Resolved, That the House of Representatives
--
- (6) urges --
-
- (A) the United States Government and the
international community to immediately take all
appropriate actions to support and strengthen
the legitimate Government of Lebanon under Prime
Minister Fouad Siniora;
The Iraq war authorization language from 2002 is
strikingly similar, as you can see here:
- (a) AUTHORIZATION -- The President is
authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United
States as he determines to be necessary and
appropriate in order to --
-
- (1) defend the national security of the
United States against the continuing threat
posed by Iraq;
I am concerned that this kind of similarity is
intentional and will inevitably result in US
military action in Lebanon, or against Syria or
Iran.
I am also concerned over the process of bringing
this resolution to the Floor for a vote. I find it
outrageous that H. Res. 1194, which calls for more
risky US interventionism in the Middle East, is
judged sufficiently "non-controversial" to be
placed on the suspension calendar for consideration
on the House Floor outside of normal order. Have we
reached the point where it is no longer
controversial to urge the president to use "all
appropriate actions" -- with the unmistakable
implication that force may be used -- to intervene
in the domestic affairs of a foreign country?
Mr. Speaker, the Arab League has been mediating
the conflict between rival political factions in
Lebanon and has had some success in halting the
recent violence. Currently, negotiations are taking
place in Qatar between the Lebanese factions and
some slow but encouraging progress is being made.
Regional actors -- who do have an interest in the
conflict -- have stepped up in attempt to diffuse
the crisis and reach a peaceful solution, and press
reports today suggest that a deal between the rival
factions may have been reached. Yet at this
delicate stage of negotiations the US House is
preparing to pass a very confrontational resolution
pledging strong support for one side and condemning
competing factions. US threats in this resolution
to use "all appropriate actions" to support one
faction are in fact a strong disincentive for
factions to continue peaceful negotiations and
could undermine the successes thus far under Arab
League moderation.
This legislation strongly condemns Iranian and
Syrian support to one faction in Lebanon while
pledging to involve the United States on the other
side. Wouldn't it be better to be involved on
neither side and instead encourage the negotiations
that have already begun to resolve the
conflict?
Afghanistan continues to sink toward chaos with
no end in sight. The war in Iraq, launched on lies
and deceptions, has cost nearly a trillion dollars
and more than 4,000 lives with no end in sight.
Saber rattling toward Iran and Syria increases
daily, including in this very legislation. Yet we
are committing ourselves to intervene in a domestic
political dispute that has nothing to do with the
United States.
This resolution leads us closer to a wider war
in the Middle East. It involves the United States
unnecessarily in an internal conflict between
competing Lebanese political factions and will
increase rather than decrease the chance for an
increase in violence. The Lebanese should work out
political disputes on their own or with the
assistance of regional organizations like the Arab
League. I urge my colleagues to reject this march
to war and to reject H. Res. 1194.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|