|
November
4, 2008
The Moral
Hazard of Regulation
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
Since
the bailout bill passed, I have been frequently
disturbed to hear "experts" wrongly blaming the
free market for our recent economic problems and
calling for more regulation. In fact, further
regulation can only make things worse.
It is important to understand that regulators
are not omniscient. It is not feasible for them to
anticipate every possible thing that could go wrong
with whatever industry or activity they are
regulating. They are making their best guesses when
formulating rules. It is often difficult for those
being regulated to understand the many complex
rules they are expected to follow. Very wealthy
corporations hire attorneys who may discover a
myriad of loopholes to exploit and render the
spirit of the regulations null and void. For this
reason, heavy regulation favors big business
against those small businesses who cannot afford
high-priced attorneys.
The other problem is the trust that people
blindly put in regulations, and the moral hazard
this creates. Too many people trust government
regulators so completely that they abdicate their
own common sense to these government bureaucrats.
They trust that if something violates no law, it
must be safe. How many scams have "It's perfectly
legal" as a hypnotic selling point, luring in the
gullible? Many people did not understand the
financial house of cards that are derivatives, but
since they were legal and promised a great return,
people invested. It is much the same in any area
rife with government involvement. Many feel that
just because their children are getting good grades
at a government school, they are getting a good
education. After all, they are passing the
government-mandated litmus test. But, this does not
guarantee educational excellence. Neither is it
always the case that a child who does NOT achieve
good marks in school is going to be unsuccessful in
life. Is your drinking water safe, just because the
government says it is? Is the internet going to
magically become safer for your children if the
government approves regulations on it? I would
caution any parent against believing this would be
the case. Nothing should take the place of your own
common sense and due diligence.
These principles explain why the free market
works so much better than a centrally planned
economy. With central planning, everything shifts
from one's own judgment about safety, wisdom and
relative benefits of a behavior, to the discretion
of government bureaucrats. The question then
becomes "what can I get away with," and there will
always be advantages for those who can afford
lawyers to find the loopholes. The result then is
that bad behavior, that would quickly fail under
the free market, is propped up, protected and
perpetuated, and sometimes good behavior is
actually discouraged.
Regulation can actually benefit big business and
corporate greed, while simultaneously killing small
businesses that are the backbone of our now
faltering economy. This is why I get so upset every
time someone claims regulation can resolve the
crisis that we are in. Rather, it will only
exacerbate it.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|