|
February
10, 2009
Freedom From
Government
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
President
Obama signed an executive order last week
continuing the faith-based initiatives program
created by former President Bush. When the program
was created, I warned that giving taxpayer money to
private religious organizations would eventually
lead to political control and manipulation of them.
This week has provided some evidence that this was
a justified concern.
The logic behind funding faith-based initiatives
seemed reasonable to some. Private organizations
are much more effective in charitable endeavors
than government programs and bureaucracies.
Therefore, why not "outsource" some of the
government's welfare-state activities to these
worthy organizations? This appealed to many
conservatives, especially after the follow-up
executive order exempting recipients from
discriminatory hiring laws, which assured many that
taking federal funds would not jeopardize their
control over their own operations. But beware the
government program started under an administration
you like, for it may look a lot different under the
one you don't. Exemptions that Bush gave, Obama can
take away.
But now, dependencies on federal money have been
set, operations have been expanded accordingly, and
many charities are waiting breathlessly for the
administration to tell them what new conditions
they will have to meet. With the stroke of a pen,
religious charities might not be able to take into
consideration a job applicant's faith, sexual
orientation or lifestyle if they wish to remain
eligible for that taxpayer money that was so
enticing a few years ago. Similarly, if FOCA
(Freedom of Choice Act) is passed, will Catholic
Church hospitals be forced to offer abortion
services to retain their federal funding? Can they
remain solvent without it?
This is the major problem with basing a private
business model on the receipt of government funds.
This money does not come without control, or the
future possibility of control. We are seeing
parallel control grabs in industries that have
recently been the recipients of taxpayer largess.
Government officials are now discussing executive
compensation on Wall Street, banking, and in the
auto industry. How much is too much to pay someone?
When is a bonus deserved? But because politicians
have bought their way into these industries, these
are now political decisions. It is easy to utilize
class envy to whip up public support for these
interventions, but government always slides down
the slippery slope. Politicians are also discussing
other aspects of these businesses in which they are
not expert, such as, what should lending standards
be? What sort of cars should we direct the auto
industry to make? Once government money infiltrates
a balance sheet, "taxpayers" meaning "politicians"
have a say in how you operate.
Money is the Trojan horse that government uses
to infiltrate and infect organizations. Funding
that, on the outset, is designed to strengthen and
support, will bureaucratize and regulate in the
end. It is sad to see charities now having reason
to focus on lobbying, regulatory compliance and
paper pushing to get and retain money taken by
force, rather than beefing up private, voluntary
fundraising activities. Those tempted to join
Washington's ongoing bailout bonanza should instead
take the famed advice of former First Lady Nancy
Reagan on the acceptance of harmful and addictive
substances and "Just Say No" to government money.
This is the best protection from government
control.
Paul
Archive
Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican
member of Congress from Texas.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|