|
Albert
Camus, Anarchism and the Individual
by SARTRE
Few concepts are more misunderstood than
anarchism. Much of the efforts of civilization have
been devoted to define anarchy as chaos, disorder
and turmoil. For the powers that govern, the threat
of mob rule is the decisive risk to their
privileged status. But is this the correct
conclusion to describe the essence of anarchy? That
nebulous abstraction known as society, exists as an
artificial fabrication, designed to synthesize
individuals into a unified structure. Even the most
avid proponent of law and order must concede that
the organization of institutions is based upon
singular components. The entire purpose of society
demands restrictions upon the unbridled freedom of
individuals.
Thus, posing the question: Is society necessary,
becomes a revolutionary act.
Placing limits on freedom can be self imposed or
coerced from external influences. Presenting
arguments that self interest is enhanced, when
destructive behavior is willingly tempered respects
the natural rights that each person possesses.
However, when constraints are imposed using the
rational - for the betterment of the "common good"
- it usually means that the ruling factions seek to
protect their position.
Albert Camus is often portrayed as a depressing
figure, offering little hope or optimism. While
"The Stranger" may not make the short list for a
wedding party, the union that men and women enter
with their fellow neighbors, seldom approaches a
meaningful and permanent relationship.
The short story, "The
Guest" is "a troubling story of Algerian
culture and free will. "The Guest" works on many
levels, from the question of Arab relations to what
choices a person must make alone. Camus does not
offer solutions; he does not even offer clear
questions. The reader of "The Guest" is left to his
or her own questions and answers." This assessment
of vague, indecisive and perceived incoherent
orientation doesn't produce a resolution to our
personal condition. For this reason, Camus and most
Existentialists are branded as irrelevant. Yet,
those who achieve an earnest introspection conclude
that the order that society claims is so important
does not really exist.
A critique of this work, by U.
Buster offers this appraisal: "Anarchy is
personal; it is not a collective possibility. It
rests upon the idea of a person acting within a
sphere where his existence is not intrusive upon
the existence of another human being unless invited
to be so. Should a person find that he has
uninvitedly trespassed upon the serenity of
another, Individual Anarchy points that man toward
accepting the responsibility for his own actions
while not condemning the failure of others to own
up to the things they may have done wrong."
The theme of non requested anguish creates the
anxiety of choice. Conform, obey and do your duty
as a citizen, or deal with the unpleasant judgment
of what might be an opposite but correct decision?
"The ambiguity of Camus' The
Guest is intentional; sharing Daru's (main
character - native French-Alergian) point of view,
we share also his frustration at having to deal
with the perplexing situation that is thrust upon
him. If he could truly know his Arab guest, know
his guilt or innocence, he could make without
difficulty the choice to free him or lead him to
jail. But no one ever truly knows another, and yet
we must all choose again and again."
Some may misinterprete that morality is relative
if one should not judge another. Quite the
contrary, the seeming absurdity of a conflict stems
from the rejection of ethics that guide each person
to behavior in a moral manner, based upon a willful
choice. Standards provided by society, enforced by
government and sanctified by the STATE are not
equivalent to morality. Virtue and righteousness
may well clash with the order within a community.
Would this form of anarchy be justified?
Camus is known as a novelist and playwright more
than a philosopher. The theater often impacts the
public with a message that profound thinkers rarely
approach in their formal tracts. Rebellion is a
reoccurring necessity for Camus. If the state of
individual anarchy is the inherent plight of our
common nature and choice is the inevitable dilemma
we face, why is the rebel condemned as an outlaw
when the crimes of the State are the inexorable
imperative?
Is harmonious subjucation the basis of a good
citizen or does the individual retain the
responsibility to act morally in the face of
pernicious laws? Camus was moved by the enormity of
the civil structure. His distress was not self
induced, but was directed towards the utter failure
of our self imposed prison, where we do time,
within a penal colony of a congenial 'PC' culture.
What is normal behavior to the mass majority may
well be insane and destructive punishment of the
innocent.
Anarchism does not require armed revolt, but it
does demand active moral confrontation.
Insurrection will usually fail and the prospects
for any replacement regime are likely to be based
upon the same false tenets. Camus confronts the
stark reality that the individual, while preeminent
in value and worth, is treated as chattel of the
State. The reason that the populace allows this
tragic injustice lies in their unwillingness to
deal with the harsh fact that the most depraved
among us strive to make regulations for the rest.
The codes of society are generally adopted without
scrutiny. When Camus states: "Integrity has no need
of rules", we are given an insight that few can
digest. Their own lack of honesty, principle and
integrity allows them to accept the madness that
dominates society.
Camus presents a challenge for those willing to
take the high road to personal fulfillment. In
order to respect your own individuality, your
willingness to make a concerted effort to
appreciate the value of anarchy is essential.
Freedom is inescapable, even for the captive. The
guests you invite into your world earned their way
to an invite. Those who place demands and
requirements under the threat of coercion violate
the natural order. Their substitute dictum cannot
approach the supreme law. Evict the intruder,
safeguard your home.
<<
Previous -- Next
>>
SARTRE
Archive
SARTRE (aka James Hall) is a reformed, former
political operative. This pundit's formal
instruction in History, Philosophy and Political
Science served as training for activism, on the
staff of several politicians and in many campaigns.
"Populism" best describes the approach to SARTRE's
perspective on Politics. Reforms will require an
Existential approach. "Ideas Move the World," and
SARTRE'S intent is to stir the conscience of those
who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and
traditional value culture for America. Visit
SARTRE's website: BREAKING
ALL THE RULES. Contact SARTRE by e-mail:
BATR@sartre.info.
SARTRE's Blogs: Existentialism
Philosophy Blog , and Old
Right - BATR Reflections. Also BATR
News.
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|