|
December
13, 2004
Tobacco
& the Continuation of the Big Lie
by Steve
Farrell
The last three states I lived in have
educational funds set up from the tobacco
settlements. And as if to irritate me, I keep
hearing and reading periodic, self-righteous,
thick-headed sermons on how wonderful this fund is,
how just a cause it was that brought it into
being.
I suppose in every state, kids go to college
free, thanks to 'the settlement.'
'The settlement' sounds so middle ground that it
almost convinces one that it wasn't 'The Robbery,'
or 'The Betrayal,' or 'The Big Lie" that it was and
is.
The claim, to this day, is that Big Tobacco hid
from the public the fact that its product might be
detrimental, to the health of its users, perhaps
fatal, thus causing untold deaths and disabilities,
which in turn cost the states big money.
Oh yes, the states, which of their own free will
didn't exclude, or sufficiently hike, the premiums
of tobacco users for their insurance coverage,
despite the risks.
After the bloodsucking lawyers chalked up the
victory, the states, not unlike the lawyers,
swooped down to cash in on the cash cow, as if
heaven had heard their prayers to pay for more of
their socialist programs, which forcefully
redistribute the wealth of private enterprise to
'the needy.'
It's all a Big Lie -- and yet the lie continues
to spread in government, media and 'educational'
circles.
We've always known better. I knew it as a kid
growing up in New York back in the 1960s and '70s.
The warning labels were clear enough to me, as were
the denunciations of tobacco use in my health ed
classes, the lung cancer two of my grandmothers
had, the throat cancer one of my grandfathers had,
and, well, the first puff I decided to try, which
turned my skin green.
Who's kidding whom? Everyone knew that tobacco
was not good for the body -- and we've known it for
a long, long time.
Let's go all the way back to Columbus' Journal
in 1492, when he and his crew first encountered
tobacco users among the natives.
"[U]pon [our] journey
[we] met with great multitudes of people,
men and women with firebrands in their hands and
herbs to smoke after their custom."
In the footnotes, we read:
- The two Spaniards met upon their journey
great numbers of people of both sexes; the men
always with a firebrand in their hands and
certain herbs for smoking: these are dry, and
fixed in a leaf also dry, after the manner of
those paper tubes which the boys in Spain use at
Whitsuntide: having lighted one end they draw
the smoke by sucking at the other, this causes a
drowsiness and sort of intoxication, and
according to their accounts relieves them from
the sensation of fatigue. These tubes they call
by the name of tobacos. I knew many Spaniards in
the island of Espanola who were addicted to the
use of them, and on being reproached with it as
a bad habit, replied that they could not bring
themselves to give it up. I do not see what
relish or benefit they could find in them.
This, the footnote states, is "the origin of
cigars."
An addiction, a bad habit, so-called in
1492?
Christianity, as well, has long called tobacco
the "evil weed."
My own faith declared of tobacco in 1833:
"tobacco is not for the body, neither for the
belly, and is not good for man, but is an herb for
bruises and all sick cattle, to be used with
judgment and skill."
"Sin taxes" on tobacco and other items have
equally been with us as long as our country has
been in existence. Somebody knew something.
Thomas Jefferson was one of those in the know.
In his "Notes on Virginia" (written in 1781) he
advised Virginia to end tobacco production for more
useful crops, such as olives. His argument, in
part, had to do with his desire to abolish slavery,
for tobacco farming, as labor intensive as it was,
promoted its continuation (in more than one way).
But more than this, he never used tobacco or
spirituous liquors (even refusing them on this
death bed), because he knew the obvious, that they
were bad for one's health and a detriment to the
strength of mind and character he pursued all his
days.
What bothers me the most, however, is not just
the Big Lie that none of us knew &endash; we all
knew &endash; but our willingness to subvert the
law for profit, and political gain. For regardless
of the detriment to health that tobacco presents,
the industry was legal, and the precedent set is
immoral and dangerous to our liberties.
The U.S. Constitution outlawed ex post facto
laws, that is, laws which prosecute someone for
what was a legal activity at the time of the
supposed offense, by imposing a new law or new
standard retroactively. And yet, what do we have
here but such a violation, in spirit if not in
fact?
Why, then, do we continue to praise this
overthrow of our laws, this robbery, this
socialist-styled redistribution of the wealth into
the hands of dirty lawyers and empty-headed
politicians as wonderful?
It isn't.
|
Radical Academy contributor Steve
Farrell is associate professor of
political economy at George Wythe College,
a pundit with national news powerhouse
NewsMax.com,
and the author of Dark Rose, an
inspirational novel reviewers are calling
"a modern classic."
For you West Coast night owls, every
Monday you can catch Steve on Mark
Edward's 'Wake up America!' talk radio
show on 50,000-Watt KDWN, 720 AM, 10 p.m.
to midnight; or on the Internet at
AmericanVoiceRadio.com
|
|
|
You
can learn more about and/or order Dark
Rose by Clicking Here.
|
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|