Liberty
Letters

May 11, 2005
John Adams #23
The Great
Pillars of American Liberty
by Steve Farrell
Recently, I watched a noted atheist spit his
venom against American Christians for standing up
for the right of their kids to have access to the
truth in the classroom, the truth about America's
unique founding, a founding centered not just on
the triumph of reason, as some wrongfully claim,
but on the triumph of reason coupled with faith,
particularly the Christian faith.
Coming to the ACLU member's defense, one of the
interviewers cited as proof that America was not
founded by Christians -- nor upon the principles of
Christianity -- the 1796 Treaty of Tripoli, which
declared in Article XI: "the government of the
United States of America is not in any sense
founded on the Christian religion."
He asserted this as legal proof, under the
supremacy clause, that this must be and still is
the case -- but more than that, with key founder
President John Adams' signature on it, a personal,
in-your-face testimony against Christians and their
incessant claims about God's hand in founding this
nation.
Sure, we're all convinced.
Notwithstanding that such a claim contradicts
everything in John Adams' writings to the contrary
(we'll get to that in a minute), and the rest of
the key founders, for that matter, and
notwithstanding the testimony of two centuries
before our founding, and nearly two centuries after
that founding that embraced America's Christian
tradition in Congress, in the courts, in
presidential speeches, in the public school
classrooms, and in state and local governments,
without question.
Notwithstanding that little sidestep, here's
another: The U.S. does not have and has not had the
original copy of this treaty for at least two
centuries (it is lost); the two originals that do
exist (in Italian and Arabic) have no such phrase,
no such clause in the treaty, period.
What we do have is a 'certified copy' written by
a man, Joel Barlow, who brought to publication
Thomas Paine's diatribe against Christianity, "The
Age of Reason," and whose motives might be
described as suspect.
The Avalon Project at Yale University, without
assigning any motives to Mr. Barlow, notes of the
blatant discrepancy:
- As even a casual examination of the
annotated translation of 1930 shows, the Barlow
translation is at best a poor attempt at a
paraphrase or summary of the sense of the
Arabic; and even as such its defects throughout
are obvious and glaring. Most extraordinary (and
wholly unexplained) is the fact that Article 11
of the Barlow translation, with its famous
phrase, "the government of the United States of
America is not in any sense founded on the
Christian Religion," does not exist at all.
There is no Article 11. The Arabic text which is
between Articles 10 and 12 is in form a letter,
crude and flamboyant and withal quite
unimportant.
How that script came to be
written and to be regarded, as in the Barlow
translation, as Article 11 of the treaty as
there written, is a mystery and seemingly must
remain so. Nothing in the diplomatic
correspondence of the time throws any light
whatever on the point (1)
These Yale researchers then note that:
- [E]vidence of the erroneous
character of the Barlow translation has been in
the archives of the Department of State since
perhaps 1800 or thereabouts; for in the
handwriting of James Leander Cathcart [the
American Consul to Tripoli, at the time] is
the statement
that the Barlow translation
is "extremely erroneous." (2)
A "poor attempt at a paraphrase," "defects
throughout," "obvious and glaring," "extremely
erroneous," a "famous phrase
[that]
does not exist at all"; of these I have little
doubt.
But returning to Mr. Barlow's motives in penning
such a copy upon provisions that did not exist: his
connection to the doctrines of the fallen angel
Thomas Paine, and his own descent from his former
involvement in the ministry into what was then
dubbed "liberal Christianity" looms large, and
helps unravel "the mystery."
So do a couple of other possible character
flaws.
A little over a decade after the signing of the
Treaty of Tripoli, in an April 24, 1812 letter from
James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, we read of
Madison's concerns about Barlow's fidelity to
representing America in yet another land,
France:
A letter from Barlow to Granger fills us with
serious apprehensions that he is burning his
fingers with matters which will work great
embarrassment and mischief here, and which his
instructions could not have suggested.
(3)
Madison was concerned about the man's fidelity
to his American commission, and common sense. John
Adams had similar concerns. After denouncing the
recent works of Tom Paine as "the Ravings and
Rantings of Bedlam," in a July 15, 1813 letter to
Jefferson, Adams moved to the subject of Tom
Paine's publisher, Joel Barlow, who was "about to
record Tom Paine as the great author of the
American Revolution!"
To which Adams retorted, "If he was; I desire
that my name may be blotted out forever, from its
records." (4) For Barlow to even consider repeating
this outrageous fallacy for the reading of future
generations, demonstrated a tendency for easy
manipulation by Paine, and if not that, then toward
delusion, or rank dishonesty.
Finally, the original Treaty of Tripoli of 1805
that IS in our possession, and IS signed by a
Founding President, has no such, Barlow inspired,
anti-Christian clause. (5)
The bottom line: If this is the best Founding
Era 'proof' these historical revisionists can come
up with against Christianity (and John Adams), it
is pathetic. -- An original treaty signed by Adams
that is not the original, not signed by Adams (on
the copy in dispute), at odds with both of the
originals that we do have, declared by the then
American Consul to Tripoli, Leander Cathcart, to be
an "extremely erroneous" copy, at odds with the
treaty that followed but a few years later, and
written by a man whose motives and judgment were
suspect. Pathetic indeed.
Equally pathetic is any attempt to attach the
noble name of John Adams to a denunciation of
America's godly beginnings.
A small sample of the real John Adams reveals
just how deep the fraud of the anti-Christian
crowd. When Adam's was asked by an educational
group of youth to identify America's founding
pillars, here is what he answered in a document
that CAN be authenticated:
- Science [the science of government]
and Morals are the great Pillars on which this
Country has been raised to its present
population, opulence and prosperity, and these
alone, can advance, support and preserve
it.
He then added:
- Without wishing to damp the ardor of
curiosity, or influence the freedom of inquiry,
I will hazard a prediction, that after the most
industrious and impartial researches, the
longest liver of you all will find no
Principles, Institutions, or Systems of
Education, more fit, IN GENERAL to be
transmitted to your posterity, than those you
have received from your Ancestors.
(6)
Years later in a letter to Jefferson, Mr. Adams
further elaborated on what he meant that
day:
- Could my Answer be understood, by any candid
reader or hearer, to recommend, to all
others[:] The general principles, on
which the Fathers achieved Independence were the
only principles in which that beautiful assembly
could unite
And what were these
general principles? I answer, the general
Principles of Christianity, in which all these
Sects were United: And the general principles of
English and American liberty
which had
united all parties in America, in majorities
sufficient to assert and maintain her
Independence. Now I will avow, that I then
believed, and now believe, that those general
Principles of Christianity, are as eternal and
immutable, as the Existence and Attributes of
God; and that those Principles of Liberty, are
as unalterable as human Nature and our
terrestrial, mundane System. I could therefore
safely say, consistently with all my then and
present information, that I believed they would
never make discoveries in contradiction to these
General Principles." (7)
This is typical John Adams, the same man who
laid it on the line quite clearly that "Our
constitution was made only for a moral and
religious people," that it was "wholly inadequate
to the government of any other." (8)
That "Statesmen
may plan and speculate
for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone,
which can establish the principles upon which
freedom can securely stand." (9)
That "The Christian religion is, above all the
religions that ever prevailed or existed in ancient
or modern times, the religion of wisdom, virtue,
equity, and humanity." (10)
And, eleven years before Jefferson penned the
Declaration of Independence, "[that rights
preceded government], rights that cannot be
repealed or restrained by human laws -- Rights
derived from the great Legislator of the Universe."
(11)
Well, these are the roots, the Great Pillars
that past and future generations of youth ought to
frequently refer back to as learning and science
move forward, these "eternal and immutable"
principles that lay at the foundation of everything
good -- lest in the name of progress we pass down
to posterity nothing more than a high-brow,
high-tech house of cards.
But here's one more vital point: Adams would
have nothing to do with the lie that passes around
the university and public school system today as
solid granite truth, that America's roots go deep
into another soil, that of the amoral, libertine,
European 'Enlightenment.' Here is what Adam's said
of that 'illustrious' founding group:
- [They appear] to me like young
scholars from a college of sailors flushed with
recent pay or prize money, mounted on wild
horses, lashing and spearing, till they would
kill the horses and break their own necks.
(12)
He wasn't kidding. And the French Revolution,
the Napoleonic Wars, two world wars, the invention
and perpetuation of mass murdering, liberty
destroying communism and fascism, and now the
socialist, world government promoting, secularist
European Union on that continent, proved him
prophetic. License is not liberty. The European
Enlightenment with all of its anti-God,
anti-private property, anti-limited government
rhetoric is not the legacy this country's ancestors
passed down to our children.
Yet it is to these latter 'founders' that the
ACLU and the revisionist 'scholars' young and old,
who have hijacked America's educational system, and
rewritten America's story to fit their Godless,
socialist paradigm, would have you and your kids
look back to -- look back like Lot's wife to the
polluted, prideful, despotic people and political
philosophies our progenitors barely escaped, back
to the land where the battle cry 'Liberty!
Equality! Fraternity!" hid a more absolute, more
thorough 'Tyranny!'
Adams had it right. One pillar of salt is
enough. We don't need 300 million more. Not on our
watch.
Author's note:
There were other factors at play that may have
influenced Joel Barlow to insert such ideas in his
"extremely erroneous" copy of the original. Read
this insightful article by David Barton at
http://wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?ResourceID=5
Footnotes:
1. Miller, Hunter. "The Avalon Project at Yale
Law School: The Barbary Treaties: Tripoli 1796.
Found online at: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/bar1796n.htm.
2. Ibid.
3. Madison, James. Writings of James
Madison, Volume 2, 1794-1815," p.
533.
4. Cappon, Lester J. The Adams-Jefferson
Letters: The Complete Correspondence between Thomas
Jefferson & Abigail and John Adams,
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and
London, 1959, renewed 1987, p. 358.
5. "Treaty of Peace and Amity, Signed at Tripoli
June 4, 1805, online at http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/bar1805t.htm.
6. Cappon, Lester J. Quoted from Adams' answer
to "the Address of the Young Men of the City of
Philadelphia, the District of South Wark, and the
Northern Liberties," p. 339.
7. Ibid., pgs. 339-340.
8. Adams, John; Adams, Charles Francis, ed..
The Works of John Adams, Second President of the
United States, Volume IX, Boston: Little Brown,
1854, p. 229.
9. Ibid. p. 401
10. Adams, John; Butterfield, L.H. Diary and
Autobiography of John Adams, Volume III.
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1961, p.
234, from diary entry for June 21, 1776.
11. Adams, John; Taylor. Robert J., editor.
Papers of John Adams, Volume 1, Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977 -- p. 109, as
quoted in Grant, James. John Adams: Party of
One. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005,
p. 62.
12. Cannon, Lester. J. Pgs. 357-358.
Farrell
Archive
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|