Homepage
Newsletter
Search
Updates
About
Adler
Dolhenty
Adventures
Philosophers
Critiques
Glossary
Quotations
Mini-courses
Aquinas
Essays
Philosophy
Politics
Religion
Education
Science
Media
FAQ
Ask
Guestbook
Forum
Bookstore
Emporium
Newsstand
Calendar
Subscribe
Feedback
Tell a friend
Votecaster
Cartoons

Politics Resource Center

Essays, Opinion, & Commentary

Politics Resource Center Main Page


Books about Politics and Current Events in The Radical Academy Bookstore
Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices

Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources


Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy

Bookstore
Magazine Outlet
Music Store
Video Store
DVD Store
Computer Store
Camera & Photo Store
Computer/Video Games
Software Store
Outlet Store
Cellular Phones
Toys & Games
Tools & Hardware
Outdoor Living
Consumer Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares
Baby Superstore
Apparel & Accessories
Gourmet Food
Sporting Goods
Jewelry & Watches
Health & Personal Care




Liberty Letters

November 13, 2003

Jefferson, Letter 5

Check Power or Checkmate?

by Steve Farrell

 

"History has informed us," wrote Thomas Jefferson, "that bodies of men as well as of individuals, are susceptible of the spirit of tyranny." (1)

An interesting peer into human nature. A principle we ignore at our peril.

Jefferson was restating the obvious but often forgotten maxims:

  • that men are not angels;
  • that power corrupts; and,
  • that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

But a fourth maxim was aimed at as well. Jefferson taught that not only are monarchies susceptible to tyranny, but also aristocracies, and democracies.

Didn't he say, "bodies of men as well as individuals, are susceptible to the spirit of tyranny"?

Or did we miss that?

Representative government, Jefferson knew, still filled the Capitol with something less than a flock of saints, and something more like a collection of men who, no matter how pure their motives are at first, will be tempted to exercise unrighteous dominion, at last.

Thus, the democratic form, in and of itself, is no security against tyranny.

"One hundred and seventy-three despots would surely be as oppressive as one … As little will it avail us that they are chosen by ourselves. An elective despotism was not the government we fought for," he wrote. (2)

He was referring to the tyranny of the majority.

"The concentrating [of the legislative, executive, and judicial powers] in the same hands is precisely the definition of despotic government. It will be no alleviation that these powers will be exercised by a plurality of hands, and not by a single one." (3)

It is not good enough to say we are free, not good enough to merely have government by consent. The people need to understand "the principles of free government," and a successful experiment in government by consent will abide by those principles. Near the top of the list is this one:

The powers of government should be so divided and balanced among several bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others. (4)

Our Constitution embodies this principle. Separate are legislative, executive, and judicial powers. Separate are the two branches of the legislature, as well. Each power, each branch, possessing checks and balances upon their neighboring powers and branches. Further, there is the federal principle, wherein all the powers not delegated specifically to the national government, belong to the states or the people. (5)

The Bill of Rights, provides yet another check; while the constitutional mandate that the states guarantee a republican form of government to their people, (6) helps insure that government on the state level is similarly checked and balanced, and that city and county governments played a vital role in all this checking and balancing.

Nevertheless, this marvelous system in place, we return to Jefferson's warning that bodies of men are susceptible to the spirit of tyranny, even under so perfect a form of government as ours. Two centuries since our founding, we find violations of this vital principle everywhere.

The Supreme Court has usurped the power to legislate. The Executive branch has a host of regulatory agencies which legislate, execute, and judge the law; the states have nearly lost all their rights; and the federal government collectively has incrementally abandoned powers delegated to them by the people, to unelected, unaccountable, un-American, international bodies which have no such check and balance system in place.

If this is true, and it is true, shouldn't we be alarmed?

Have men become angels, or doesn't power still corrupt? Are we no longer in need of checks and balances, or is tyranny at our doorstep?

I think we know the answer. The question is, what are we going to do about it?

 

Footnotes

1. Bergh, Albert Ellery, ed., Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume I, p. 190.

2. Ibid, Volume II, pgs. 162-163.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. U.S. Constitution, Amendments 9, 10.

6. Ibid., Article 4, Section 4.

<< Letter 4 -- Letter 6 >>


Radical Academy contributor Steve Farrell is associate professor of political economy at George Wythe College, a pundit with national news powerhouse NewsMax.com, and the author of Dark Rose, an inspirational novel reviewers are calling "a modern classic.". Have a comment? Contact Steve at stevenmfarrell@cox.net.

You can learn more about and/or order Dark Rose by Clicking Here.


Enrich your life with a book about politics and current events...

Enrich your political & social life with a politics or news magazine...


Politics Resource Center Main Page


-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.