Liberty
Letters

November 20, 2003
Jefferson, Letter 6
Led by
God
by Steve Farrell
On Monday, March 4, 1805, Thomas Jefferson gave
his Second Inaugural Address as President of the
United States.
In his closing remarks he painted a provocative
parallel between the settling and establishment of
the United States following our exodus from tyrants
in Europe, and the settling and establishment of
ancient Israel following their exodus from tyrants
in Egypt.
He referred to God as
- that Being in whose hands we are, who led
our forefathers, as Israel of old, from their
native land, and planted them in a country
flowing with all the necessaries and comforts of
life; who has covered our infancy with His
providence and our riper years with His wisdom
and power, and
goodness...
Jefferson, a man not just of reason, but of
faith, continued: "I shall need, too, the favor of
that Being
"
And why was that?
Because, said he, "the weaknesses of human
nature, and the limits of my own understanding,
will produce errors of judgment sometimes injurious
to your interests."
Bottom line, he loved his country and countrymen
too much to rely only upon his own abilities and
understanding.
And so, he continued:
- I ask you to join with me in supplications
that He will so enlighten the minds of your
servants, guide their councils, and prosper
their measures, that whatsoever they do shall
result in your good, and shall secure to you the
peace, friendship, and approbation of all
nations. (1)
He was speaking to every American citizen, as
President of the United States, in an official
capacity, to remind America whence cometh her
blessings, how dependent he personally felt upon
God, and to express an interest in their prayers
that God would help him and their country.
And so, what's wrong with that?
Is this not about humility -- something in short
supply today? Is this not but an exercise of the
inalienable right to speak freely? Is it not pure
nonsense to believe that any man becomes less free
because another man declares that our liberties
come from God (not the state), that man being
imperfect, ought to pray to God for His guidance
and blessings?
Just how is it that free expression forces
religion down any man's throat? Where is the harm
to a man's property, or to his life, or to his
civic rights?
Here's the plain truth: Public speech, public
confession, and public monuments are not
manifestations of forced religion, but its
opposite.
That such reminders, monuments and testimonials
were not deemed by Jefferson as manifestations of
forced religion are further witnessed by
Jefferson's proposal for the Great Seal of the
United States.
Think of this. Shortly after 1776, he submitted
a drawing depicting the aforementioned theme, that
is "the children of Israel in the wilderness, led
by a cloud by day, and a pillar of fire by night",
with the bold inscription "Israel Led by God's
Pillar of Fire," and in smaller print, "Liberty
under God's law -- Man's Inalienable Birthright of
Freedom." (2)
Again, this provocative parallel.
It was a popular belief. He might have
discovered it on his own, or maybe he read it in
Samuel Sherword's oft cited 1776 political sermon,
"The Church's Flight Into the Wilderness." (3)
Franklin introduced a similar drawing, for the
great seal, depicting Moses standing on the shore,
extending his hand over the sea, which overwhelmed
Pharaoh, while rays from a pillar of fire in the
clouds reach to Moses, expressing that he acts by
command of the Deity. With this Motto: "Rebellion
to tyrants is obedience to God." (4)
And so what's wrong with that?
These drawings, these speeches were not idols
that men must bow down before or perish. Give
Jefferson credit. They were, however, reminders
that something larger than the state presides over
man -- and that any man who sets himself in the
place of God will have a hot rebellion on his
hands.
Excuse me, and excuse Chief Justice Moore, but
isn't this the very rationale for what the
founder's called a just revolution? Or have we
forgotten?
So here's a little reminder: Standing up for
such beliefs in public does not constitute force in
religion -- they are only words. Removing a man
from office for defending his belief, however, does
in fact constitute an act of force against faith.
It is the approach of the communists. It is the
approach of the old church states in Europe.
Peter of old, once asked, "Whom shall we fear,
God or man?"
Justice Moore made his choice. Now, you make
yours.
Footnotes
1. Jefferson, Thomas. Second Inaugural
Address.
2. Patterson, Richard S., and Richardson,
Dougall, The Eagle and the Shield: A History of
the Great Seal of the United States,
Washington: U.S. Department of State, 1976, p.
18.
3. Sandoz, Ellis, editor. Political Sermons
of the Founding Era, 1730-1805, Volume I,
Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1998, pgs. 493-525.
4. Patterson and Dougall, p. 16. For more on the
Great Seal, see also: Skousen, W. Cleon. The
Making of America, The National Center for
Constitutional Studies, Washington D.C., 1985, pgs.
32-33.
<<
Letter 5 -- Letter
7 >>
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|