Religion Resource Center Euthanasia: Mercy or Murder? Select a Feature... Religion Main Page General Resources Religious Texts Online Western Religions Eastern Religions Articles & Essays Search the Bible Videos & DVDs Religion Resource Center Main Page
Books about Religion in The Radical Academy Bookstore Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy Bookstore Magazine Outlet Music Store Classical Music Store Video Store DVD Store Computer Store Camera & Photo Store Computer/Video Games Software Store Musical Instruments Outlet Store Cellular Phones Toys & Games Tools & Hardware Automotive Store Outdoor Living Consumer Electronics Home & Garden Kitchen & Housewares Baby Superstore Apparel & Accessories Gourmet Food Grocery Store Sporting Goods Jewelry & Watches Health & Personal Care Beauty Store		These are links to articles and essays which appear elsewhere on the Internet. This material is NOT on our website. Because the Academy lists material from other websites on the Internet does not imply acceptance or approval of the comments or opinions expressed by the author of the material. Nor is the Academy responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts included. It is your job to be a critical reader. Introduction and resources by Byron Barlowe, Editor/Webmaster, Leadership University Terri Schiavo's name has been immortalized as her case, which has dragged on through an oddysey of court-ordered terminations and legal stays, once again seemed to climax. It is a tug-of-war involving her estranged husband and parents over whether or not she is allowed to die. The legal wranglings and special circumstances surrounding Schiavo's situation present a host of legal, ethical and moral challenges. The core question: Should she be euthanized or is her husband -- who long ago abandoned the marriage and her care, reputedly despite a huge settlement to pay for it -- seeking to legally murder her?  Rendered a quadriplegic 15 years ago by a heart stoppage, Schiavo nonetheless remains responsive to conversation, requires no life support, requires only a feeding tube at mealtimes and would likely respond to therapy, according to 32 neurologists who swore so in an affidavit recently. Yet, Mr. Schiavo's lawyers argue for removing her feeding tube and allowing her to dehydrate when the last legal stay ends on March 18. Is her case one that exemplifies a hopeless prolongation of life? Not according to a large movement to save her, headed by her parents (see their Web site: http://www.terrisfight.org). In direct response, the U.S. Congress will soon vote on "The Incapacitated Person's Legal Protection Act."  We seek not to report extensively on the Schiavo case nor to unravel that particular knot here, but rather to get underneath the issue and broaden the survey to other kinds of right-to-die cases and the ethical topic of euthanasia in general. This seems all the more timely given this month's headlines. Clint Eastwood's film Million Dollar Baby, whose main theme was euthanasia, won Best Director and Best Picture alongg with several other awards. Best Foreign-Language Film went to Spain's The Sea Inside, also centered on mercy-killing. Gene Edward Veith writes (see article below), "...In a perfect storm of euthanasia-related developments -- the same week as the Schiavo decision and the euthanasia-fest at the Oscars -- the Supreme Court, which refused to hear an appeal from Mrs. Schiavo's parents, announced that it will rule on Oregon's law permitting physician-assisted suicide." The time has certainly come and is long past, many believe, to gain conviction on the matter. Yet, according to surveys, Americans seems all too willing to seek the death of others (active euthanasia) the way Europeans have gone.  Many complicated issues prevail. One is clear: actively seeking death for anyone is anathema to a biblical worldview. American law as historically rooted in the belief in an inalienable right to life, disallows even taking ones' own life. However, while ever-improving life-saving and sustaining technologies move the lines of demarcation, assessing the gray areas becomes increasingly tricky. Conundrums include: Is continued treatment to be seen as prolonging life or postponing death? How does one determine this and who should determine it? Are we "playing God" to remove treatment or life-sustaining food and hydration? Are we "playing God" to prolong a life through those means? In which cases? In which kinds of cases are one or the other true and how can that be determined? What about when the patient is unable to decide and has not made his or her wishes known? Should the standard for such decisions be whether treatment is obligatory or one of proportionality? Or usefulness and burdensomeness? By what standards do we judge these? What about the thorny cases of those in a permanently vegetative state?  None of these vital questions are exhausted here and several are not be dealt with except in a cursory or implied way. The debatable issues surrounding death by choice seem endless. But critics point out that, once the slippery slope of ending life intentionally for one class of people is approached, other classes will inevitably slide down that slope, as has happened in The Netherlands.  Few simple answers, no easy ones. Examine the arguments for yourself. Featured Articles Euthanasia's Roe v. Wade, by Professor Gene Edward Veith: A perfect storm could be brewing against the sick and injured with the Schiavo case, a recent spate of films promoting euthanasia and the Supreme Court agreeing to hear a so-called right to die law in Oregon. Schiavo Case Puts Human Dignity on Trial, by Douglas Groothuis: Ethics professor and author of Truth Decay Groothuis paints the reality of the case of Terri Schiavo, whose story has captured the nation, in this opinion piece for The Rocky Mountain Times. He incisively relates society's compliance with abortion-on-demand and the right to die movement to the Nazi mindset, and contrasts that with a Judeo-Christian perspective. Million Dollar Missed Opportunity, by Wesley J. Smith: What Clint Eastwood's Oscar-winning movie could have done, according to renowned bioethicist and lawyer Smith. The film and director, both of which won "best" honors at this year's Oscars, fell into the kind of "easy way out" mentality of those that Million Dollar Baby depicted. Prescription for Chaos - Understanding the lethal Oregon case that's hitting the Supreme Court, by Wesley J. Smith: Widely respected bioethics expert Smith explains the legalities surrounding the Oregon assisted suicide case, the challenge to which the U.S. Supreme Court will soon hear. "This case is actually less about assisted suicide than it is about 'federalism,'" that is, the federal government's right to enforce its laws uniformly across the States in regards to controlled substances. Ethics & Life's Ending: An Exchange, by Robert D. Orr & Gilbert Meilaender: An exchange between ethicists Drs. Orr and Meilaender on some thorny issues surrounding end-of-life decisions. Dr. Orr claims, "It is commonly accepted that the timing of 80 percent of deaths that occur in a hospital is chosen." If this is accurate, then a number of those debates that may appear simple and clear on the surface must not be so easy to decide--even for biblical believers, who have more guidance. May be helpful for those facing such decisions. Death Wish II - Euthanasia, the Second Time Around, by Dr. Allan Carlson: Carlson describes the grim parallel between the euthanasia of Hitler's Nazi regime, its roots in a eugenics of socialist utilitarianism and rejection of Christian ethics with the rise of the eerily similar euthanasia movement of today. The three-fold worldview they share: a radical shift in medical ethics by practitioners themselves; the rise of an ethos that views "death as a positive instrument for progress," and; a connection of mercy-killing with the greater economic good. A chilling cautionary history with a biting contrast at the end. The Movie "One True Thing" and Euthanasia, by Dr. Kenneth Simcic: An overview of the legal and rhetorical issues involved in euthanasia. Some stern warnings are given as another country's experience with this practice is discussed. A bit dated, but valuable both in chronicling "how we got here" and as a broad, brief primer on the issue. The above information is courtesy of Leadership University, part of the Telling the Truth Project: Telling the Truth at the speed of life! Enrich your life with a book about religion... Enrich your life with a religion magazine...   Academy Showcase Specials Religion Resource Center Main Page
-- Top of Page -- [Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer] Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, 2002-03, & 2004-05 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.