|
November
1, 2007
Understanding
Atheism
by Mike S. Adams, Ph.D.
Author's
Note: Special thanks to Amy, Brad, Mike, and the
Free-Thought Society at Clemson University.
I declared myself an agnostic in 1983 and stayed
that way until I declared myself an atheist in
1992. The road from Christianity to atheism and
back to Christianity was -- with my apologies to
Beatles fans -- long and winding. It took many
years to travel.
The decision to major in psychology was one of
many factors that led to my decision to leave the
church. Not many psychology departments have more
atheists than the nearest philosophy department.
But many come close. And the way the discipline of
psychology approaches religion is likely to lead
some students astray.
I recall quite well my first exposure to Freud
and his ideas about the Oedipus complex. I became
well-schooled in his ideas about man's compelling
psychological need to create a God in his own image
-- to resolve various feelings of guilt flowing
from childhood trauma. I was so captivated by these
ideas that I read "Moses and Monotheism," "Totem
and Taboo," and "The Future of an Illusion" in my
spare time. Each took me further away from God.
B.F. Skinner had a similar impact on my
thinking. The principles of operant conditioning
were not always used to explain religion away.
Strict behaviorists seldom have a compelling need
to "look inside the black box" or, in other words,
analyze unobservable thoughts. But these principles
do provide a ready explanation for those convinced
that man created God, not vice versa. I was so
captivated by Skinner that I read "Walden Two" and
"Beyond Freedom and Dignity" in my spare time.
These books pushed me further in the direction of
atheism.
The notion that psychology might provide an
explanation for atheism -- rather than theism -
never really occurred to me during my years as a
psychology student (from 1983 until 1989 when I
received my M.S. in psychology). But, in March of
1989, a woman named Martha Hamilton -- the mother
of my "second mother" Lisa Chambers -- responded to
my praise of B.F. Skinner and the behaviorists with
the following comment: "It just sounds like a bunch
of people trying to get out of serving God."
I must confess that I thought Mrs. Hamilton was
just a simple-minded fundamentalist. Now, I realize
that she was right and I was wrong.
If psychologists were really interested in the
fair and balanced treatment of religion they would
see the obvious connection between cognitive
dissonance theory and atheism. And, of course, they
would discuss it in their classes in conjunction
with the application of Freudian and Skinnerian
theories seeking to explain religion away.
In the 1950s and 1960s, psychologists like Eliot
Aronson began to suggest that behavior sometimes
causes attitudes rather than vice versa. In the
wake of this discussion, cognitive dissonance
became a popular psychological theory. Put simply,
it spoke to the issue of how beliefs sometimes
emerge from a tension between certain cognitive
elements.
For example, if a person is cognizant of the
fact that smoking causes cancer, he will experience
dissonance when he thinks about the fact that he is
a smoker. He may be inclined to adopt other beliefs
like "They will probably find a cure for cancer
before I get it." He may develop powerful, even
silly, rationalizations like "I'll quit next year"
or "It does not matter because the world could end
tomorrow in a nuclear holocaust" or "I could be hit
by a car tomorrow so I might as well smoke
today."
Because Christianity is sometimes a demanding
religion, it, too, may create a good deal of
cognitive dissonance. For example, the declaration
"I am a Christian" can sometimes clash with the
awareness that "Christians are supposed to tithe"
or "Christians are supposed to love their
enemies."
I have seen people who began tithing to the
church and loving their enemies upon converting to
Christianity. But that is not how it always ends
for the converted Christian. Like me, many other
Christians have resolved the tension by, at least
temporarily, deciding to abandon the Way. Sometimes
it is simply easier to say "I am not a
Christian."
Those who become agnostic or atheist often say
that it was due to an intellectual journey or an
intellectually honest re-appraisal of childhood
faith. But, as my mentor David L. McMillen used to
say, "People rarely understand their own
motivations."
I believe that cognitive dissonance theory helps
people better understand their own motivations. I
believe it has helped me to understand my fall from
Christianity, which, thankfully ended with a return
to the church.
But the theory might also explain why it took me
so long to get back to church. I abandoned atheism
on March 7th of 1996. But I did not return to the
church until October of 2000. The reason for the
delay was simple: I was ashamed.
As I imagined myself walking back into a church,
I also imagined people thinking and, perhaps, even
saying "What is Mike Adams doing here at church?"
But I made it back and my life continues to be
blessed as I walk further with Jesus every day.
I can understand the dissonance that is felt by
the young woman who wrote to me last week telling
of her multiple suicide attempts in the wake of a
battle with manic depression. She says she cannot
seem to get out of bed on Sundays because of the
shame she feels for the harm she has tried to
inflict upon herself. She needs to hear from
confessing and humble Christians who say they
desperately want her back regardless of what she's
done.
I often wonder why we speak of the atheists as
if they are our enemies. And I wonder whether that
should matter if we call ourselves Christians. I
hope this column will inspire some cognitive
dissonance, for the writer and the reader alike.
And I hope the tension will be resolved with love,
which the best cure for dissonance, or, for that
matter, anything else.
Adams
Archive
©2007 by Mike S. Adams and reprinted with
permission of the author.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Order
Dr. Adams' Book
|
|
|
An irreverent, disturbing look at
higher education through the eyes of a
former Leftist radical whose
disillusionment with the politics of
diversity and political correctness turned
him into a "token" campus
Conservative.
Portrayed by the university
administration and mainstream media as a
"flame-thrower," Professor Adams lampoons
sacred cows such as affirmative action,
Gay Pride, cultural sensitivity training,
multi-culturalism, censorship and other
"sins" committed in the name of academic
freedom.
Dr. Mike S. Adams, a professor of
Criminal Justice at the University of
North Carolina at Wilmington, is a regular
contributor to conservative web and print
publications. He recently defended himself
against a charge of libel in a
high-profile free-speech controversy that
landed him on numerous top-ranked national
TV and radio shows, including Rush
Limbaugh, CNN and Hannity &
Colmes.
|
Welcome
to the Ivory Tower of Babel: Confessions
of a Conservative College
Professor,
by
Mike S. Adams
|
Mike
S. Adams was born in Columbus, Mississippi on
October 30, 1964. While a student at Clear Lake
High School in Houston, TX, his team won the state
5A soccer championship. He graduated from C.L.H.S.
in 1983 with a 1.8 GPA. He was ranked 734 among a
class of 740, largely as a result of flunking
English all four years of high school. After
obtaining an Associate's degree in psychology from
San Jacinto College, he moved on to Mississippi
State University where he joined the Sigma Chi
Fraternity. While living in the fraternity house,
his GPA rose to 3.4, allowing him to finish his
B.A., and then to pursue a Master's in Psychology.
In 1990, he turned down a chance to pursue a PhD in
psychology from the University of Georgia, opting
instead to remain at Mississippi State to study
Sociology/Criminology. This decision was made
entirely on the basis of his reluctance to quit his
night job as member of a musical duo. Playing music
in bars and at fraternity parties and weddings
financed his education. He also played for free
beer.
Upon
getting his doctorate in 1993, Adams, then an
atheist and a Democrat, was hired by UNC-Wilmington
to teach in the criminal justice program. A few
years later, Adams abandoned his atheism and also
became a Republican. He also nearly abandoned
teaching when he took a one-year leave of absence
to study law at UNC-Chapel Hill in 1998. After
returning to teach at UNC-Wilmington, Adams won the
Faculty Member of the Year award (issued by the
Office of the Dean of Students) for the second time
in 2000.
After
his involvement in a well publicized free speech
controversy in the wake of the 911 terror attacks,
Adams became a vocal critic of the diversity
movement in academia. After making appearances on
shows like Hannity and Colmes, the O'Reilly Factor,
and Scarborough Country, Adams was asked to write a
column for the Heritage Foundation's
Townhall.com.
Today
he enjoys the privilege of expressing himself both
as a teacher and a writer. In his spare time, he
loves spending time with his wife, Krysten. He is
also an avid hunter and reader of classic
literature.
Visit his website at http://www.DrAdams.org.
E-mail: adams_mike@hotmail.com
Enrich
your life with a book about
religion...
|